高级检索
葛永林, 徐正春, 吴杰, 王中意. 生态学的本体论困惑及可能的出路[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 18(4): 8-13. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2019099
引用本文: 葛永林, 徐正春, 吴杰, 王中意. 生态学的本体论困惑及可能的出路[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 18(4): 8-13. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2019099
GE Yong-lin, XU Zheng-Chun, WU Jie, WANG Zhong-yi. On the Perplexity of Ecological Ontology and Its Possible Resolution[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2019, 18(4): 8-13. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2019099
Citation: GE Yong-lin, XU Zheng-Chun, WU Jie, WANG Zhong-yi. On the Perplexity of Ecological Ontology and Its Possible Resolution[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2019, 18(4): 8-13. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2019099

生态学的本体论困惑及可能的出路

On the Perplexity of Ecological Ontology and Its Possible Resolution

  • 摘要: 由于生态学的核心概念和理论定义都是操作性的,致使生态学的群落、生态系统等核心概念容易在不同的使用者和生态情景中产生较大的歧义;群落演替、生态平衡、多样性与稳定性等理论不能有效实现对生态学实体、生态现象与过程的本体论承诺。生态学本体论存在着整体论与还原论、实在论与反实在论的分歧。整体子跨越生态系统的所有结构和功能层次,它在量的方面可变化、整体与部分的本质关系恒定的特征也许能给我们解决生态学的本体论问题提供新的启迪。

     

    Abstract: Because the definitions of the core concepts and theories of ecology, such as community, ecosystem, etc., are operational, they are not clearly defined, which can easily lead to ambiguities and terminological confusion among different users and ecological situations.Meanwhile some ecological theories, for example, theories about community succession, ecological balance, diversity and stability, cannot effectively realize the ontological commitment to these ecological entities, phenomena,and processes. There existed divergences between holism and reductionism, realism and anti-realism in ecology. A holon spanning all structural and functional levels of the ecosystem, whose variable quantity and constant essential relationship between whole and part, may provide us with new enlightenment to solve the ecological ontological problems.

     

/

返回文章
返回