高级检索
李健. 反思环境审美中的两种非人类中心主义倾向[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版), 2013, 12(1): 18-22.
引用本文: 李健. 反思环境审美中的两种非人类中心主义倾向[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版), 2013, 12(1): 18-22.
LI Jian. Reflection of Two Kinds of Non-anthropocentrism Trends in Environmental Aesthetics[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2013, 12(1): 18-22.
Citation: LI Jian. Reflection of Two Kinds of Non-anthropocentrism Trends in Environmental Aesthetics[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2013, 12(1): 18-22.

反思环境审美中的两种非人类中心主义倾向

Reflection of Two Kinds of Non-anthropocentrism Trends in Environmental Aesthetics

  • 摘要: 基于当前对生态环境恶化的忧虑,环境伦理学中非人类中心主义在美学领域对人类中心主义也展开了批判。在主要的环境鉴赏模式理论中,卡尔松二元论构架与柏林特整体论都暗含了非人类中心主义倾向。这种伦理价值向审美价值的转移是以后者的牺牲为代价的。但是审美主体性并非伦理学意义上的“人类中心主义”,承认审美主体在环境鉴赏中的合法地位,并建立起一种自由且健康的环境美学模式是必要的,也是可能的。

     

    Abstract: Based on the concern of ecological deterioration, the nonanthropocentrism of environmental ethics criticizes the anthropocentrism in field of aesthetics. Among of the environmental appreciation models, both Allen Carlsons dualism theory and Arnold Berleants holism theory have an inclination towards nonanthropocentrism. The transformation of ethics value to aesthetic value is at the cost of sacrificing aesthetic. However, aesthetic subjectivity is not equal with anthropocentrism in an ethics sense. It is necessary and possible to acknowledge the essential and legit status of aesthetic subject and establish a free and healthy appreciation model of environmental aesthetics.

     

/

返回文章
返回