高级检索
谭新建. 科研院所建成环境主观评价方法研究以中国林业科学研究院为例[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 14(4): 73-77. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2015113
引用本文: 谭新建. 科研院所建成环境主观评价方法研究以中国林业科学研究院为例[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 14(4): 73-77. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2015113
TAN Xin-jian. A Study on Subjective Evaluation Methods of the Built Environment of Research Institutes: Taking Chinese Academy of Forestry as an Example[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2015, 14(4): 73-77. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2015113
Citation: TAN Xin-jian. A Study on Subjective Evaluation Methods of the Built Environment of Research Institutes: Taking Chinese Academy of Forestry as an Example[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2015, 14(4): 73-77. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2015113

科研院所建成环境主观评价方法研究以中国林业科学研究院为例

A Study on Subjective Evaluation Methods of the Built Environment of Research Institutes: Taking Chinese Academy of Forestry as an Example

  • 摘要: 以主观评价方法体系为主导,探索建成环境主观评价方法的适用范围,提高评价方法的理论应用广度。系统 地采用了认知地图调查法、被测对象自由报告法和无结构型问卷法等多个建成环境主观评价方式,对中国林业科 学研究院院内建成环境进行了深入的分析和研究。结果表明院内建筑和环境品质之间存在显著关系,主轴线可视 为建筑元素分布的核心区域,办公区是职工环境意象的中心,办公区内楼宇间距、交通便利性、绿化层次对院内环 境品质的评价起到重要作用。选取样本的典型性存在不足,但运用多种评价方法可在一定程度上弥补研究要点的 缺失。

     

    Abstract: Using the system of subjective evaluation method as the leading way, this article is to explore the suitable range of subjective evaluation methods of the built environment in order to promote the oretical applying scope of the evaluation methods. The subjective evaluation methods of the built environment, i. e. , cognitive map survey, free report evaluation of the evaluated objects, and open- ended questionnaire, were systematically used to profoundly analyze and study the campus environment of Chinese Academy of Forestry. The results showed that there was a significant correlation between the campus's buildings and the quality of the environment; the main axis was recognized as the core area of building elements; the office area was understood as the center of the environmental image by the staff; and the distance between buildings, the convenience of transportation and the greening levels played the important roles in the evaluation of environmental quality in the campus. At the same time, the representativeness of the selected samples was not so sufficient, but taking use of a variety of methods might make up the deficiency of research point.

     

/

返回文章
返回