高级检索
望玺, 谢屹, 余尚鸿. 集体林权纠纷解决的制度现状与对策研究基于江西省某县个案的分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 15(2): 48-53. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2016008
引用本文: 望玺, 谢屹, 余尚鸿. 集体林权纠纷解决的制度现状与对策研究基于江西省某县个案的分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 15(2): 48-53. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2016008
WEI Wang-xi, XIE Yi, YU Shang-hong. On Current Institution and Countermeasures for Solving the Tenure Disputes of Collective Forests:A Case Study in a County of Jiangxi Province[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2016, 15(2): 48-53. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2016008
Citation: WEI Wang-xi, XIE Yi, YU Shang-hong. On Current Institution and Countermeasures for Solving the Tenure Disputes of Collective Forests:A Case Study in a County of Jiangxi Province[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2016, 15(2): 48-53. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2016008

集体林权纠纷解决的制度现状与对策研究基于江西省某县个案的分析

On Current Institution and Countermeasures for Solving the Tenure Disputes of Collective Forests:A Case Study in a County of Jiangxi Province

  • 摘要: 化解集体林权纠纷是新一轮集体林权制度改革的重要工作,但林权纠纷解决难度大,影响了改革工作的深入开 展。研究首先梳理了集体林权纠纷解决的制度安排;其次以江西省某县A、B 两个村民小组因737 号山场发生的林权 纠纷案件作为研究对象,介绍了林权纠纷解决过程的特殊性;再次,探析了现行纠纷解决制度存在的低效问题及其成 因。最后提出完善制度的顶层设计、重视非正式制度作用、加强调解机构能力建设、创新纠纷解决方法等对策建议。

     

    Abstract: Solving the tenure disputes of collective forests is the key work in the new round of tenure reform of collective forests. However, the severe difficulties in solving the tenure disputes of collective forests hamper the further development of the reform. This paper firstly reviews the current institutional arrangement for solving the tenure disputes of collective forests. Then the paper introduces the special features of process for solving the tenure disputes of collective forests by a case study on the tenure dispute of No. 737 Mountain between group A and group B in the same village in a county of Jiangxi Province. Thirdly, the paper analyzes the problems of inefficiency and corresponding causes in the current institutions for solving tenure disputes of collective forest. Finally, the paper proposes the countermeasures and suggestions, such as improving the system's top-level design, valuing the role of informal institutions, strengthening the capacity of mediation organizations, and innovating the methods of solving disputes.

     

/

返回文章
返回