Advanced search
MA Bao-jian. On the Relations Among Architecture, Landscape Architecture and Tourism from the Perspective of Logic Point: About the Subject System of Tourism[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2017, 16(3): 14-17. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2016100
Citation: MA Bao-jian. On the Relations Among Architecture, Landscape Architecture and Tourism from the Perspective of Logic Point: About the Subject System of Tourism[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2017, 16(3): 14-17. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2016100

On the Relations Among Architecture, Landscape Architecture and Tourism from the Perspective of Logic Point: About the Subject System of Tourism

More Information
  • Received Date: March 19, 2017
  • Published Date: August 31, 2017
  • A mature subject must have its logic point, i. e., the key problem that should be solved by the subject in general. The paper first summarizes the logic point's concept and connotation, then the discusses the logic points of Architecture, Landscape Architecture and Tourism respectively to be 'shelter', ' plant'and ' move'. Therefore, the difference of the three subjects is to solve the three fundamental problems of human beings'living at different scale, namely, 'dwelling', 'work and rest' and 'locomotion'. The common purpose of them is to satisfy the survival and living need of people and to supply healthy and beautiful environment for human beings from different scale, furthermore, to improve people's living standard and to make their lives better. At last, based on the Tourism's logic point— 'move', the paper puts forward that the subject system of Tourism should include three aspects: planning and designing, reservation of nature and culture, and management.
  • [1]
    马宝健.走行:旅游学的逻辑起点[J].旅游论坛, 2010, 3 (5):505-508. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3784.2010.05.001
    [2]
    蒋关军.逻辑起点之于学科形成与发展的意义[J].广西大学梧州分校学报, 2005, 15(l):66-67. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=gxdxwzfxxb200501020
    [3]
    瞿葆奎, 郑金洲.教育学逻辑起点:昨天的观点与今天的认识(一)[J].上海教育科研, 1998(3):3-5. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-SJYY199803000.htm
    [4]
    周越, 徐继红.逻辑起点的概念定义及相关观点诠释[J].内蒙古师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2006(5):16-20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7623.2006.05.003
    [5]
    冯振广, 荣今兴.逻辑起点问题琐谈[J].河南社会科学, 1996 (4):56-59. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-HNSH604.018.htm
    [6]
    黑格尔.逻辑学: 上卷[M].杨一之, 译.北京: 商务印书馆, 2004: 55.
    [7]
    王公权, 陈新一, 黄茂如, 等.试论我国园林的起源[J].园艺学报, 1965, 4(4):213-220. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-YYXB196504007.htm
    [8]
    张纵.从园林起源谈六朝时期的皇家宫苑及其他园林形式[J].东南文化, 2003(3):49-52. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-179X.2003.03.009
    [9]
    王向荣. "北京林业大学园林学院第一届青年学术年会"发言[C].北京: 北京林业大学, 2013.
    [10]
    俞孔坚.园的变迁[J].生命世界, 2006(4):78-85. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zhiwzz200604013
    [11]
    亿里.秦苑囿杂考[J].中国历史地理论丛, 1996 (2): 101-106. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZGLD602.011.htm
    [12]
    王辉.出土文字所见之秦苑囿[C] //秦都咸阳与秦文化研究: 秦文化学术研讨会论文集.西安: 陕西人民教育出版社, 2003: 76-92. http://cpfd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CPFDTOTAL-QWHH200110001008.htm
    [13]
    徐卫民.秦代的苑囿[J].文博, 1990(5):220-226. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-WEBO199005024.htm
    [14]
    王其亨, 袁守愚.华夏园林渊薮:基于湿地生态环境的先秦苑囿[J].中国园林, 2013(4):99-103. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZGYL201304023.htm
    [15]
    马宝建.发生学视角下自然旅游的本质和行为特点[J].北京林业大学学报(社会科学版), 2010, 9(2):65-67. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6116.2010.02.014
    [16]
    吴必虎, 宋子千.旅游学概论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2009:8.
    [17]
    刘住.旅游学学科体系框架与前沿领域[M].北京:中国旅游出版社, 2008:15-23.

Catalog

    Article views (900) PDF downloads (111) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return