Citation: | LI Tian-yu, HOU Fang-miao. Impact of the Opening of the New Suez Canal on the China-EU's Forest Products Trade Potential Under the Background of Belt and Road Initiative[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2018, 17(3): 63-68. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2018011 |
[1] |
TINBERGEN J. Shaping the world economy: suggestions for an international economic policy[J]. Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, 1962, 5:840-876. http://core.ac.uk/display/19398767
|
[2] |
贺书锋, 平瑛, 张伟华.北极航道对中国贸易潜力的影响——基于随机前沿引力模型的实证研究[J].国际贸易问题, 2013 (8):3-12. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=gjmywt201308001
|
[3] |
谭秀杰, 周茂荣. 21世纪"海上丝绸之路"贸易潜力及其影响因素——基于随机前沿引力模型的实证研究[J].国际贸易问题, 2015(2):3-12. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=gjmywt201502001
|
[4] |
程宝栋, 赵静萱, 秦光远.中国对欧盟林产品出口增加值测算及影响因素研究[J].农林经济管理学报, 2017, 16 (1):96-104. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=671326530
|
[5] |
靳孟楠.中国和英国商品贸易互补性与贸易潜力研究[D].武汉: 华中师范大学, 2015. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10511-1015443977.htm
|
[6] |
张璇.中欧林产品贸易影响因素及作用机制分析[D].武汉: 华中师范大学, 2013. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/zgwz-s201408007
|
[7] |
王思璇.中欧林产品贸易摩擦的趋势预测及其对双边关系的影响——基于引力模型的实证研究[J].国际贸易问题, 2009 (6):37-46.
|
[8] |
MEEUSEN W, BROECK J. Efficiency estimation from cobb- douglas production functions with composed error[J]. International Economic Review, 1977, 18:435-444. doi: 10.2307/2525757
|
[9] |
刘海云, 聂飞.金砖体系下中国双边出口效率及其影响因素分析——基于随机前沿引力模型的实证研究[J].国际经贸探索, 2015(1):16-27, 100. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=gjjmts201501002
|
[10] |
EGGER P. An econometric view on the estimation of gravity models and the calculation of trade potentials[J]. The World Economy, 2002, 2:297-312. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=10.1111/1467-9701.00432
|
[1] | Yang Chao, Liu Xi, Song Weiming, Huang Hongwei. Export Potential of China's Wood Forest Products under the Background of Dual Circulation Development Pattern[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2022, 21(1): 1-8. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2021252 |
[2] | JIANG Ya-shu, CHENG Bao-dong, MIAO Dong-ling. Trade Benefits of China’s Paper Industry from the Perspective of Trade Value Added[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2020, 19(1): 31-38. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2019131 |
[3] | ZHANG Hui, HU Ming-xing. Trade Potential of China’s Importation of Woody Forest Products from Countries along the “Belt and Road”[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2019, 18(4): 62-68. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2019066 |
[4] | YU Dan, ZHANG Lan, ZHANG Cai-hong. Evaluation on Regional Development Potential of Forest Biomass Energy Based on TOPSIS Method[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2016, 15(3): 50-55. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2016007 |
[5] | GUO Liang, WU Hong-mei, MIAO Dong-ling. An Analysis of Embodied Carbon in the Sino-US Trade of Woody Forest Products[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2015, 14(3): 53-58. |
[6] | CAI Fei, WANG Jing, SHI Jian-jun, ZHANG Cai-hong. Potential of Biomass Energy Based on Agricultural Wastes and Forestry Residues in Henan Province[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2013, 12(2): 54-57. |
[7] | CAI Fei, ZHANG Lan, ZHANG Cai-hong. Potential of Woody Biomass Energy and Its Availability in China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2012, 11(4): 103-107. |
[8] | DU Wen-jing, MIAO Dong-ling. Trade Potential of Export Areas of Wood-based Panel in China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2012, 11(1): 69-73. |
[9] | HOU Fang-miao, SONG Wei-ming, ZANG Qi. Analysis on China’s Terms of Foreign Trade of Woody Forest Products[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2009, 8(4): 68-73. |
[10] | Huo Jia, Tian Minghua, Xia Ziqian. Analysis and Forecast of Production and Trade of EuropeanMain Forestry Products[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2004, 3(3): 31-36. |