Advanced search
ZHOU Xian, LIU Xian-bo, LI Shi-ying, DENG Wen-ping. Discussion on European Tradition of Landscape Arts from the Perspective of Teutonic Aesthetics[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2018, 17(4): 45-50. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2018087
Citation: ZHOU Xian, LIU Xian-bo, LI Shi-ying, DENG Wen-ping. Discussion on European Tradition of Landscape Arts from the Perspective of Teutonic Aesthetics[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2018, 17(4): 45-50. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2018087

Discussion on European Tradition of Landscape Arts from the Perspective of Teutonic Aesthetics

More Information
  • Received Date: June 14, 2018
  • Published Date: November 30, 2018
  • This paper discusses the significance of landscape art on the premise that the picturesque garden belongs to the artistic category. From the point of view of national culture, the authors point out that Teutonic spirit of freedom and primitive religious belief are the two most important factors that influence the aesthetics of this nation. Because the aesthetic psychology of the nation is empathetic to the nature, the landscape arts of reverence for the nature can represent the tradition of Teutonic national art. The analogy method lists the complementarity of pastoral poetry and landscape painting in the same period, the contrast method compares gardening art between Teutonic and Latin people. Finally, it points out that the traditional landscape art of the Teutonic nation is a highlight of advanced ecology, and summarizes the positive value of landscape art in the contemporary ecological psychology.
  • [1]
    丹纳.艺术哲学[M].傅雷, 译.天津: 天津社会科学院出版社, 2007: 145.
    [2]
    马克思恩格斯选集: 第3卷[M].中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局, 译.北京: 人民出版社, 1972: 395.
    [3]
    罗兰·斯特龙伯格.西方现代思想史[M].刘北成, 赵国新, 译.北京: 中央编译出版社, 2005: 241.
    [4]
    诺伯特·舒尔兹.场所精神: 迈向建筑现象学[M].施植明, 译.台北: 田园城市文化事业有限公司, 1995: 42.
    [5]
    弗朗西斯·凯莉.树的艺术史[M].沈广湫, 吴亮, 译.厦门: 海峡出版发行集团, 2016: 26.
    [6]
    黑格尔.美学: 第二卷[M].朱光潜, 译.上海: 商务印书馆, 1979: 24.
    [7]
    赫伯特·里德.艺术的真谛[M].王柯平, 译.北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2004: 111.
    [8]
    针之谷钟吉.西方造园变迁史: 从伊甸园到天然公园[M].邹洪灿, 译.北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 1991: 239.
    [9]
    华兹华斯.华兹华斯诗选: 英汉对照[M].杨德豫, 译.北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2016: 189-192, 208-211.
    [10]
    陈志华.外国造园艺术[M].郑州:河南科学技术出版社, 2001:207-208.
    [11]
    罗伯特·罗森布卢姆.现代绘画与北方浪漫主义传统[M].刘云卿, 译.桂林: 广西师范大学出版社, 2003: 11, 19.
    [12]
    热拉尔·勒格朗.西方视觉艺术史: 浪漫主义艺术[M].董强, 凌敏, 姜丹丹, 译.长春: 吉林美术出版社, 2002: 16, 40.
    [13]
    卡斯滕·哈里斯.建筑的伦理功能[M].申嘉, 陈朝晖, 译.北京: 华夏出版社, 2001: 236.
    [14]
    朱建宁.情感的自然:英国传统园林艺术[M].昆明:云南大学出版社, 1999:16.
    [15]
    戴小蛮. 19世纪英国水彩风景画与古典风景画的关系[J].新美术, 2006, 27(3):53-62. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xms200603007
    [16]
    何政广, 陈英德, 张弥弥.世界名画家全集:浪漫主义风景画大师弗里德里希[M].北京:文化艺术出版社, 2009.
    [17]
    朱光潜.西方美学史:下册[M].南京:江苏人民出版社, 2015:533.
    [18]
    吴建平.生态自我:人与环境的心理学探索[M].北京:中央编译出版社, 2011:84.
    [19]
    牟春.现象学视野下的移情问题[D].上海: 复旦大学, 2008.
    [20]
    李泽厚.华夏美学[M].天津:天津社会科学院出版社, 2001:137.
    [21]
    车文丽.庄子物化论与西方移情说之比较[J].安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版), 2007, 26(6):93-96. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-4730.2007.06.022
    [22]
    ROGERS E B. Landscape design: a cultural and architectural history[M]. New York: Harry N. Abrams Inc., 2001: 233.

Catalog

    Article views (1022) PDF downloads (32) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return