Advanced search
ZENG Ai-yiran, ZHANG Yin. The Pattern of “Integrating Art into Rural Tourism” from the Perspective of TUAN Yi-Fu’s Humanistic Geography[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2019, 18(4): 25-33. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2019074
Citation: ZENG Ai-yiran, ZHANG Yin. The Pattern of “Integrating Art into Rural Tourism” from the Perspective of TUAN Yi-Fu’s Humanistic Geography[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2019, 18(4): 25-33. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2019074

The Pattern of “Integrating Art into Rural Tourism” from the Perspective of TUAN Yi-Fu’s Humanistic Geography

More Information
  • Received Date: September 19, 2019
  • Available Online: October 30, 2019
  • Published Date: November 30, 2019
  • The involvement of art in rural tourism is one of the growing trends in rural tourism in China, and this phenomenon can be grouped into " reconstructing the local” activities. Therefore, the exploration into the integration pattern will contribute to the keeping and the building of the sense of place. Based on the theory of TUANYi-Fu’s humanistic geography, this paper builds a model of " reconstructing the environment” and classifies the art integration modes, puts forward the preliminary model of " integrating art into rural tourism”, and suggests the " mode performance evaluation form” in the context of integrating art into rural tourism. With Shangyuan Artist Village of Changping District, Beijing and Zhangquanxiangju of Miyun District, Beijing as cases, two typically representative art integration modes, i.e., artist village and artistic village, are deeply explored to evaluate the performance of the modes. Questionnaire, semi-structured interviews and observational method are employed for the study. The research result shows that the mode of Artistic Village is grass-roots, stable, sustainable, and contributes positively to the rural revitalization, while the mode of Artist Village is weak, unstable, unsustainable yet still with some additional value, such as improving the attraction of rural tourism and balancing the tourism season. It is suggested that these two modes are actually complementary to each other, and a combination of two may serve as a better mode. Finally, based on the findings of the study, the paper traces back to the internal logic of the two typical cases, and attempts to propose a" resonance of art and village”practical development pattern of " integrating art into rural tourism”. With the deep exploration from three aspects of human-land relationship, owner’s intention and related subject relationship in the pattern, the paper works in concert with the ideal artistic reconstruction of rural communities.
  • [1]
    刘姝曼. 艺术介入乡村建设的回首、反思与展望−基于" 青田范式”的人类学考察[J]. 民族艺林,2017(4):5-13.
    [2]
    欧宁. 碧山共同体:乌托邦实践的可能[J]. 新建筑,2015(1):17-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3959.2015.01.005
    [3]
    王磊,孙君,李昌平. 逆城市化背景下的系统乡建−河南信阳郝堂村建设实践[J]. 建筑学报,2013(12):16-21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0529-1399.2013.12.004
    [4]
    渠岩. 青田范式:中国乡村文明的复兴路径[J]. 室内设计与装修,2017(7):126-127. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-7374.2017.07.030
    [5]
    渠岩. 艺术乡建许村家园重塑记[J]. 新美术,2014(11):76-87.
    [6]
    邹明妍,周铁军. " 社区营造”模式下乡村公共空间营建策略研究[J]. 建筑与文化,2018(12):149-150. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4909.2018.12.054
    [7]
    赵阳,郑永平. 台湾农村六级化产业发展对大陆乡村振兴的启示−以台东县永安社区为例[J]. 台湾农业探索,2018(5):1-5.
    [8]
    陈可石,高佳. 台湾艺术介入社区营造的乡村复兴模式研究−以台南市土沟村为例[J]. 城市发展研究,2016(2):57-63. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2016.02.009
    [9]
    陈静,陈佳洁,林佳玲. 艺术介入型乡创活动对我国乡村旅游发展路径的启示[J]. 南方农业,2017(16):78-82.
    [10]
    谭若芷. 艺术推动乡村建设的可能性探讨[J]. 艺术与设计(理论),2018(8):56-57.
    [11]
    林卓. 艺术介入乡村建设模式研究[J]. 公共艺术,2018(5):96-103.
    [12]
    尹爱慕. 艺术介入乡村建设多个案例比较研究与实践[D]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2017.
    [13]
    方李莉. 论艺术介入美丽乡村建设−艺术人类学视角[J]. 民族艺术,2018(1):17-28.
    [14]
    陈奕铭. 介入与融入:不同的" 乡村实践”方式[J]. 美术观察,2017(12):26-27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8899.2017.12.012
    [15]
    缑梦媛. 当艺术介入乡村[J]. 美术观察,2017(12):22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8899.2017.12.009
    [16]
    刘祖云,沈费伟. 发达国家乡村治理的典型模式与经验借鉴[J]. 农业经济问题,2016(9):93-102.
    [17]
    STEPHEN J S. Tourism in Japan:an ethno-semiotic analysis[J]. Tourism Management,2011,38:741-743.
    [18]
    石磊. 寻求" 另类”发展的范式−韩国新村运动与中国乡村建设[J]. 社会学研究,2004(4):39-49.
    [19]
    VAUGEOIS N. Rural tourism:an international perspective[J]. Annals of Tourism Research,2015,54:225-226. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2015.05.013
    [20]
    MACDONALD R,JOLLIFFE L. Cultural rural tourism:evidence from Canada[J]. Annals of Tourism Research,2003,30:307-322. doi: 10.1016/S0160-7383(02)00061-0
    [21]
    北川富朗. 乡土再造之力: 大地艺术节的10种创想[M].欧小林, 译. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2015.
    [22]
    曾旭正. 台湾的社区营造[M]. 台北: 远足文化事业股份有限公司, 2009.
    [23]
    晏阳初. 平民教育与乡村建设运动[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2014.
    [24]
    周尚意. 人文地理学野外方法[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2010.
    [25]
    陆小璇. 初论段义孚人本主义地理学思想的形成[J]. 人文地理,2014,29(4):13-18.
    [26]
    DUAN Y F. Humanistic Geography[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers,1976,66(2):266-276. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1976.tb01089.x
    [27]
    DUAN Y F. Space and place:humanistic perspective[J]. Progress in Geography,1974,6:211.
    [28]
    DUAN Y F. Topophilia: a study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values[M]. New York: Columbia University Press, 1990: 260.
    [29]
    周尚意. 人文主义地理学家眼中的" 地方”[J]. 旅游学刊,2013(4):6-7.
    [30]
    宋秀葵. 段义孚的地方空间思想研究[J]. 人文地理,2014(4):19-23.
    [31]
    DUAN Y F. Place, art, and self[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.
    [32]
    段义孚, 徐文宁. 无边的恐惧[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2011.
    [33]
    EDWARD R. Place and placenessless[M]. London: Pion Books, 1976.
    [34]
    孙俊,潘玉君,赫维人,等. 人文主义地理学与地理学人本传统的复兴[J]. 人文地理,2015,30(1):1-8.
    [35]
    叶超. 作为中国人文地理学鉴镜的段义孚思想[J]. 人文地理,2014,29(4):3-7.
    [36]
    李耕,冯莎,张晖. 艺术参与乡村建设的人类学前沿观察−中国艺术人类学前沿话题三人谈之十二[J]. 民族艺术,2018(3):71-78.

Catalog

    Article views (1432) PDF downloads (69) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return