Advanced search
XIE Chen, WANG Lan-hui, XIE Hong. Increase Efficiency and Keep Equity: Some Thoughts on Deepening Collective Forestry Tenure Reform Based on“Four Schools of Tenure Right”[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2020, 19(1): 22-30. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2019149
Citation: XIE Chen, WANG Lan-hui, XIE Hong. Increase Efficiency and Keep Equity: Some Thoughts on Deepening Collective Forestry Tenure Reform Based on“Four Schools of Tenure Right”[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2020, 19(1): 22-30. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2019149

Increase Efficiency and Keep Equity: Some Thoughts on Deepening Collective Forestry Tenure Reform Based on“Four Schools of Tenure Right”

More Information
  • Received Date: October 18, 2019
  • Available Online: March 05, 2020
  • Published Date: February 29, 2020
  • With the aims of providing suggestions for policy makers, the paper firstly briefs main progress of collective forest tenure reform on the basis of literature review. Then, it introduces opinions of the “four schools of tenure right” toward forest, discusses and proposes recommendations for the policies of China’s current collective forest tenure reform. It is found that, even though there is no universal reform pattern, the “four schools of tenure right” do discover some laws of forest tenure reform of developing countries which could shed light to China’s current collective forest tenure reform. Comparing with other schools, the property right school has impacted Chinese forestry the most as clarifying forest tenure and increasing efficiency have always been goals of the reform. The school of agrarian structure explicitly points out that market regulation may promote tenure security and that protection of farmer’s right is fundamental. The school of institutionalist emphasizes the role of government in the reform and suggest building rules of a political and legal system to consolidate reform. The common property school provides a train of thoughts on poverty reduction and rural revitalization by suggesting remaining some common forests which could be a space for the rural poor. The paper suggests that collective tenure reform should focus on consolidating reform results and tenure management by laws and regulations. When facilitating forest land scale management, overuse of financial instruments should be avoided in order to prevent “costly inequality”. Fully realizing the long term, complexity and difficulty of the reform and shifting tenure reform to routine supervision will reinforce tenure management.
  • [1]
    DEININGER K,BINSWANGER H. The evolution of the World Bank’s land policy:principles,experience,and future challenges[J]. The World Bank Research Observer,1999,14(2):247-276. doi: 10.1093/wbro/14.2.247
    [2]
    Center for International Forestry Research. GCS-Tenure project: tenure security and forest-dependent communities-a global comparative study 2014-2016[EB/OL]. [2019-07-17]. http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/brochures/CIFOR-GCSBrochure2014-E.pdf.
    [3]
    WILY L A. Collective land ownership in the 21st century:overview of global trends[J]. Land,2018,68(7):1-26.
    [4]
    朱文清,张永亮,刘浩,等. 新一轮集体林产权制度改革新动态及其完善深化改革的政策建议[J]. 林业经济,2018(11):32-43.
    [5]
    张蕾,黄雪丽. 深化集体林权制度改革的成效、问题与建议[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2016,16(4):131-137.
    [6]
    林辉煌. 林权改革与乡村振兴−对40年来集体林权制度改革的反思[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2018,18(6):12-20.
    [7]
    谭江涛,孔阳. 南方集体林权改革纠纷预防机制研究−基于度量和界定费用的视角[J]. 林业经济,2019(4):10-18.
    [8]
    陈鹏,谢屹,卫望玺,等. 集体林权纠纷解决的制度困境与对策研究[J]. 林业经济,2015(6):52-56.
    [9]
    张毓峰,胡雯. 西部民族地区集体林权制度改革路径优化[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2017,21(11):169-175.
    [10]
    孙妍. 集体林权制度改革研究−产权制度安排与绩效[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2008.
    [11]
    ELLSWORTH L. A place in the world: tenure security and community livelihoods, a literature review[EB/OL]. [2019-08-14]. https://www.forest-trends.org/wp-content/uploads/imported/Place_World.pdf.
    [12]
    LARSON A M. Tenure rights and access to forests-a training manual for research[EB/OL]. [2019-07-17]. http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/Books/BLarson1201.pdf.
    [13]
    刘拓. 深化集体林改加快产业发展服务乡村振兴[J]. 国土绿化,2018(6):11-13.
    [14]
    李周. 林权改革的评价与思考[J]. 林业经济,2008(9):3-8.
    [15]
    国家林业局林业改革领导小组办公室. 中国集体林权制度改革培训教材[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2009: 76-82.
    [16]
    谢晨,李周,张晓辉. 森林资源禀赋、改革路径选择与我国农村林业发展[J]. 林业经济,2007(1):45-52.
    [17]
    谢晨,张坤,王佳男. 奥斯特罗姆的公共池塘治理理论及其对我国林业改革的启示[J]. 林业经济,2017(5):3-18.

Catalog

    Article views (2108) PDF downloads (36) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return