Advanced search
WU Tong. Local Knowledge and Building of Ecological Civilization[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2020, 19(2): 1-5. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2020032
Citation: WU Tong. Local Knowledge and Building of Ecological Civilization[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2020, 19(2): 1-5. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2020032

Local Knowledge and Building of Ecological Civilization

More Information
  • Received Date: January 09, 2020
  • Available Online: May 21, 2020
  • Published Date: May 31, 2020
  • This paper discusses: ① Two concepts of local knowledge, i.e., anthropology and philosophy of scientific practice, which are different but related, should be explored and applied to the building of ecological civilization; ② Why is ecology a kind of local knowledge? The objects dealt with by ecology are extremely dependent on space and its scale, and have the characteristics of scale variation and diversity, spatial heterogeneity and so on. This makes ecology a special science that differs with physical science. Differences in spatial, geographical and geographical scales are undoubtedly the most obvious and relevant characteristics of being local. ③ Concept of local knowledge and building of ecological civilization. We believe that local knowledge is the most important concept and thought in the building of ecological civilization. In the process of building ecological civilization, it is impossible to realize a real ecological civilization without the dimension of local knowledge.
  • [1]
    李霞. 生态知识的地方性[J]. 广西民族研究,2012(2):60-65. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-454X.2012.02.011
    [2]
    杨庭硕. 论地方性知识的生态价值[J]. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版),2004(3):23-29. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4074.2004.03.005
    [3]
    袁同凯. 地方性知识中的生态关怀:生态人类学的视角[J]. 思想战线,2008(1):6-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-778X.2008.01.002
    [4]
    吉尔兹. 地方性知识−阐释人类学论文集[M]. 王海龙, 张家瑄, 译. 北京: 中央编译出版社, 2004.
    [5]
    吴彤. 两种地方性知识−兼评吉尔兹和劳斯的观点[J]. 自然辩证法研究,2007(11):87-94. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8934.2007.11.018
    [6]
    吴彤. 从科学哲学的视野看地方性知识研究的重要意义−以蒙古族自然知识为例[C] // 包塞音. 中国少数民族和谐思想研究(中国少数民族哲学及社会思想史学会2005年会论文集). 呼和浩特: 内蒙古大学出版社, 2008: 41-47.
    [7]
    吴彤. 再论两种地方性知识−现代科学与本土自然知识地方性本性的差异[J]. 自然辩证法研究,2014(8):51-57.
    [8]
    吴彤. 复归科学实践−一种科学哲学的新反思[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2010.
    [9]
    吴彤. 科学实践与地方性知识[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2017.
    [10]
    大卫·利文斯通. 科学知识的地理[M]. 孟楷, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2017.
    [11]
    孙俊. 知识地理学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016.
    [12]
    林祥磊. 梭罗、海克尔与“生态学”一词的提出[J]. 科学文化评论,2013(2):18-28. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6804.2013.02.002
    [13]
    RICKLEFS R E. 生态学 [M]. 第5版. 孙儒泳, 译. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2004.
    [14]
    林祥磊. 生态学实验的地方性特征分析[J]. 自然辩证法研究,2019(3):44-49.
    [15]
    张彤,蔡永立. 生态学研究中的尺度问题[J]. 生态科学,2004,23(2):175-178. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-8873.2004.02.019
    [16]
    杨庭硕, 田红. 本土生态知识引论[M]. 北京: 民族出版社, 2010.

Catalog

    Article views (1065) PDF downloads (56) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return