Advanced search
HUANG Chun-yan, SU Jian-lan, HE Chao. Transformation of Forestry Organizational Management Model Under Three Rights Separation: A Case Study of Xixia Village, Sha County, Fujian Province[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2021, 20(1): 39-46. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2020107
Citation: HUANG Chun-yan, SU Jian-lan, HE Chao. Transformation of Forestry Organizational Management Model Under Three Rights Separation: A Case Study of Xixia Village, Sha County, Fujian Province[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2021, 20(1): 39-46. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2020107

Transformation of Forestry Organizational Management Model Under Three Rights Separation: A Case Study of Xixia Village, Sha County, Fujian Province

More Information
  • Received Date: July 06, 2020
  • Available Online: November 15, 2020
  • Published Date: April 20, 2021
  • The system of three rights separation is regarded as another important farmland property right system reform after the household contract responsibility system, which is of great significance to the development of forestry. Based on the analysis framework of “structure-action”, this paper takes Xixia Village as an example to study the influence of the three rights separation system on the transformation of forestry organizational management model. The results show that: ① the defect of informal three-right separation system is the reverse incentive of the evolution of forestry organizational management model; ② the formal three-right separation system has an incentive and restriction effect on the evolution of forestry organizational management model through transaction costs and security psychology; ③ at the governance level, the institutional arrangement of property rights within the organization has an incentive and restrictive effect on the evolution of the forestry organizational management model through power and power incentives, forest farmers’ benefits, opportunity costs and transaction costs; ④ at the level of resources allocation, the circulation of management right has an incentive and restrictive effect on the evolution of forestry organizational management model through economic performance and operating cost. In view of the restrictive function of the three rights separation system, corresponding suggestions are put forward.
  • [1]
    朱道林. “三权分置”的理论实质与路径[J]. 改革,2017(10):115-119.
    [2]
    熊超. 三权分置背景下江西农村土地经营权的权利性质现状分析[D]. 南昌: 江西财经大学, 2019.
    [3]
    韩振华. 完善农地“三权分置”制度− 一个基于“国家土地调节权”的新视角[J]. 政治经济学论,2018,9(5):144-169.
    [4]
    吴一恒,徐砾,马贤磊. 农地“三权分置”制度实施潜在风险与完善措施−基于产权配置与产权公共域视角[J]. 中国农村经济,2018(8):46-63.
    [5]
    申始占. 农地三权“分置”的困境辨析与理论建构[J]. 农业经济问题,2018(7):46-57.
    [6]
    李宁,汪险生. “三权分置”改革下的农地集体所有权落实−基于集体经济组织治理案例的理论思考[J]. 经济学家,2018(8):86-93.
    [7]
    张颖,朱奎. “三权分置”下农地经营权流转价格研究−基于价格博弈的分析[J]. 价格理论与实践,2018(8):77-81.
    [8]
    孔祥利,赵娜. 农业转型:引入土地制度变迁的生产函数重建[J]. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018(5):34-42.
    [9]
    姜翔程,魏晨宇. 农地三权分置背景下农村水利工程产权模式改革[J]. 求实,2018(3):98-108,112. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-8487.2018.03.008
    [10]
    胡平,李兆友. 论农地三权分置改革中基层政府的角色调适[J]. 农业经济,2018(9):82-85. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6139.2018.09.032
    [11]
    李小红,段雪辉,牛世鹏. 农村土地三权分置与村民自治:冲击与回应[J]. 延边大学学报(社会科学版),2018(5):110-115. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3311.2018.05.014
    [12]
    蒋瞻,蔡志坚,陈书林,等. “三权分置”对农户用材林林地转出行为的影响研究−基于计划行为理论[J]. 江淮论坛,2018(4):12-18. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-862X.2018.04.002
    [13]
    杜翠萍. “三权分置”背景下山西集体林权流转现状分析[J]. 林业经济,2018,40(9):50-54.
    [14]
    贺东航. 我国集体林权制度改革视角下的农村基层治理[J]. 政治学研究,2011(2):108-114.
    [15]
    贺东航. 我国集体林权制度改革后的农村基层治理机制研究[J]. 当代世界与社会主义,2010(3):120-125.
    [16]
    贺东航. 林权制度改革与乡村治理研究[J]. 东南学术,2009(5):44-50. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-1569.2009.05.006
    [17]
    左停,柴浩放. 中国农村社区集体林治理及其制度视角的评述[J]. 林业经济,2006(4):17-21.
    [18]
    侯一蕾,吴静,温亚利. 集体林权制度改革视角下林农合作组织发展研究−以福建省邵武市为例[J]. 山东农业大学学报(社会科学版),2013,15(2):75-80.
    [19]
    吴静和. 集体林区林业股份合作经济的研究[J]. 林业经济问题,1994(4):1-8.
    [20]
    洪燕真,戴永务,余建辉,等. 福建省林权制度改革后的林业经营组织形式探讨[J]. 林业经济问题,2009,29(2):163-167. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9709.2009.02.015
    [21]
    黄和亮,王文烂,吴秀娟,等. 影响农户参与林业合作经济组织因素分析−以福建省为例[J]. 林业经济,2008(9):55-58.
    [22]
    程云行,张春霞. 林业产业组织创新研究[J]. 林业经济问题,2003(2):92-95. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9709.2003.02.007
    [23]
    郑少红. 深化林权改革 创新农村经营制度−基于福建林业合作组织的实证分析[J]. 中国集体经济,2008(15):162-164. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-1283.2008.15.087
    [24]
    罗必良. 经济组织的制度逻辑: 一个理论框架及其对中国农民经济组织的应用研究[M]. 太原: 山西经济出版社, 2000: 284-302.
    [25]
    邓金堂. “行动−结构”视角下的农民合作过程研究[D]. 桂林: 广西师范大学, 2017.
    [26]
    WILLIAMSON O E. The new institutional economics:taking stock,looking ahead[J]. Global Jurist,2000,38(3):595-613.
    [27]
    刘卫东,郑凯文,吴宇哲. 基于“结构-行动”分析框架的宅基地退出机制研究−以宁波市为例[J]. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版),2019,40(2):50-60.
    [28]
    郑凯文. 基于“结构-行动”分析框架的宅基地退出机制研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2019.
    [29]
    丁关良,阮韦波. 农村集体土地产权“三权分离”论驳析−以土地承包经营权流转中“保留(土地)承包权、转移土地经营权(土地使用权)”观点为例[J]. 山东农业大学学报(社会科学版),2009,11(4):1-8,121. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-8091.2009.04.001
    [30]
    叶兴庆. 从“两权分离”到“三权分离”−我国农地产权制度的过去与未来[J]. 中国党政干部论坛,2014(6):7-12.
    [31]
    楼建波. 农户承包经营的农地流转的三权分置−一个功能主义的分析路径[J]. 南开学报,2016(4):53-69.
    [32]
    唐烈英,童彬. 论农村土地“三权分置”法律制度之构建[J]. 社会科学,2018(8):96-104.
    [33]
    CHEUNG S N S. The structure of a contract and the theory of a non-exclusive resource[J]. Journal of Law & Economics,1970,13(1):49-70.
    [34]
    谭世明,李岍,邢美华. 后林改时期林业经营组织制度创新研究[J]. 求实,2012(1):38-42. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-8487.2012.01.010
    [35]
    谢和生. 集体林权制度改革下林农合作组织形式研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2011.
    [36]
    李维安,戴文涛. 公司治理、内部控制、风险管理的关系框架−基于战略管理视角[J]. 审计与经济研究,2013,28(4):3-12.
    [37]
    杨璐璐. “三权分置”与“长久不变”政策协同的保障机制:自稳定承包权观察[J]. 改革,2017(10):132-139.
    [38]
    王金河. 推进新型农业合作经济组织发展的探讨[J]. 调研世界,2010(1):12-14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7794.2010.01.004
    [39]
    成新华. 我国农业微观组织模式的比较与选择[J]. 科学·经济·社会,2006(3):11-15.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 范新和. 莆田木雕的传承与发展研究. 天工. 2023(11): 66-68 .

    Other cited types(1)

Catalog

    Article views (1014) PDF downloads (34) Cited by(2)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return