Exploration on Changing of Urban Planning Thoughts of China from the Perspective of Landscape Aesthetics

LIN Yu-chen; LUO Tao; ZHANG Xue-wei

doi:10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2020113

Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science) > 2021 > 20(3): 24-31. > DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2020113

LIN Yu-chen, LUO Tao, ZHANG Xue-wei. Exploration on Changing of Urban Planning Thoughts of China from the Perspective of Landscape Aesthetics[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2021, 20(3): 24-31. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2020113

Citation:

PDF (1706 KB)

Exploration on Changing of Urban Planning Thoughts of China from the Perspective of Landscape Aesthetics

LIN Yu-chen^{1, 2,},
LUO Tao¹,
ZHANG Xue-wei^1, ,

1.
School of Architecture and Urban-Rural Planning, Fuzhou University, 350108, P. R. China
2.
Xiamen Heshan Construction Development Co, LTD, 361006, P. R. China

More Information

Received Date: July 13, 2020
Available Online: August 12, 2021
Published Date: September 29, 2021

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Planning thought is the forerunner of planning decision behavior, and the planning decision under the specific historical background reflects the aesthetic cognition at that time. To carry out a diachronic study of the behavior of planning decision-making and to analyze the essence of aesthetic thoughts contained in the evolution of urban planning thoughts is helpful to clarify the relationship between aesthetic thoughts and planning decision-making behaviors. Based on the theory of landscape (environmental) aesthetics, this paper analyzes the typical urban planning decision-making behaviors in the three periods of ancient China (before 1840), modern China (from 1840 to 1949) and after the founding of the People's Republic of China (after 1949), and interprets the thinking driving characteristics behind urban planning thoughts. It is clear that one of the reasons for the current urban homogenization lies in the weakening of traditional symbolic aesthetics in planning thoughts and the restriction of immature culture. The research aims to provide a new perspective and direction for the inheritance of urban planning ideas under the new normal.
- urban planning,
- landscape aesthetic,
- aesthetic cognition,
- case analysis

FullText(HTML)

References (19)

References

[1]	GARCIA-MARTIN M,FAGERHOLM N,BIELING C,et al. Participatory mapping of landscape values in a Pan-European perspective[J]. Landscape Ecology,2017(32):2133-2150.
[2]	程相占,阿诺德·伯林特. 从环境美学到城市美学[J]. 学术研究,2009(5):138-144. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7326.2009.05.022
[3]	黄继刚. 城市美学:经验、理论与方法[J]. 新疆大学学报(哲学·人文社会科学版),2013,41(2):119-122. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2820.2013.02.025
[4]	李雪莹,齐童,张国庆,等. 国内外景观美学研究综述[J]. 黑龙江科技信息,2016(24):261-262.
[5]	董鉴泓. 中国城市建设史[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2004.
[6]	全峰梅. 规划师的城市美学−读《城市美学》有感[J]. 规划师,2006(3):88-89. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2006.03.023
[7]	史蒂文·布拉萨. 景观美学[M]. 彭锋, 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2008.
[8]	杨秉德. 中国近代城市与建筑（1840—1949）[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 1993.
[9]	青岛市档案馆. 《青岛城市规划图》1910年 [EB/OL]. [2020-06-15]. http://www.qdda.gov.cn/qddaxxw/qddaxxw/csjy/csdt/18971949ndt/2020/12/08/40281a62763dee510176414d8f58373e.html.
[10]	青岛市档案馆. 《大青岛市发展计划图》−分区计划图1935年[EB/OL]. [2020-06-15]. http://www.qdda.gov.cn/qddaxxw/qddaxxw/csjy/csdt/18971949ndt/2020/12/08/40281a62763dee510176415182a23760.html.
[11]	杨倩,徐飞鹏. 里院建筑对青岛现代居住设计的启示[J]. 青岛理工大学学报,2016,37(3):47-53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4602.2016.03.010
[12]	邹东. 试论民国时期广州城市规划建设[J]. 规划师,2017,33(1):142-146. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2017.01.021
[13]	冯江. 广州变形记:从晚清省城到民国第一座现代城市[J]. 城市与区域规划研究,2013,6(1):107-128.
[14]	傅舒兰,西村幸夫. 论杭州城湖一体城市形态的形成−从近代初期湖滨地区建设新市场计画相关的历史研究展开[J]. 城市规划,2014,38(12):15-22. doi: 10.11819/cpr20141204a
[15]	李浩. “一五”时期城市规划技术力量状况之管窥−60年前国家“城市设计院”成立过程的历史考察[J]. 城市发展研究,2014,21(10):72-83. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2014.10.011
[16]	严定中,康安平,刘薇,等. 天津城市规划历史沿革及启示[J]. 城市发展研究,2016,23(12):5-10,22.
[17]	SIBLEY F N. The aesthetic point of view:selected essays[J]. Analytic Philosophy,2010,25(1):31-34.
[18]	KAČERAUSKAS T. Philosophical aspects of urban strangeness:the case of Vilnius[J]. Studies in East European Thought,2017(3):1-10.
[19]	GREGORY C. Aesthetic explanation and the archaeology of symbols[J]. The British Journal of Aesthetics,2016,56(3):233-246. doi: 10.1093/aesthj/ayw059

Cited By

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (759) PDF downloads (49)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Exploration on Changing of Urban Planning Thoughts of China from the Perspective of Landscape Aesthetics

Abstract

References

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content