Evolution and Comparison of Government-led Governance Modes in Foreign Protected River Areas Based on the Concept of Adaptation

LI Peng; GAO Ya-ting; LAN Hong-mei; ZHAO Min

doi:10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2021091

Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science) > 2021 > 20(2): 80-88. > DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2021091

LI Peng, GAO Ya-ting, LAN Hong-mei, ZHAO Min. Evolution and Comparison of Government-led Governance Modes in Foreign Protected River Areas Based on the Concept of Adaptation[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2021, 20(2): 80-88. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2021091

Citation:

PDF (604 KB)

Evolution and Comparison of Government-led Governance Modes in Foreign Protected River Areas Based on the Concept of Adaptation

LI Peng^{1, 2,},
GAO Ya-ting^{1, 2},
LAN Hong-mei^{1, 2},
ZHAO Min^{2, 3, ,}

1.
School of Business and Tourism Management, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650500, P. R. China
2.
Planning and Research Center of National Park, National Park Administration of China, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Kunming, 650216, P. R. China
3.
School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650500, P. R. China

More Information

Received Date: May 19, 2021
Available Online: June 21, 2021
Published Date: June 29, 2021

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Protected river area is a special type of protected area to maintain the outstanding value of rivers, and governance by government is the main mode of management for protected river area. Adaptation aims to reduce the adverse effects by adjusting the main body to environmental changes, which can provide ideas and methods for the management of protected river areas. Based on the adaptive analysis framework, this paper compares the mode of government-led governance and evolution process of protected river areas in the United States, New Zealand, Canada and Australia from four aspects: legal policies, governance bodies, resources ownership and funding sources. The following conclusions are drawn: four different modes of government-led governance have been formed in the four national protected river areas; federal centralized management is a prominent feature of the federal-led mode in the United States, central-led and moderate decentralization is the manifestation of the comprehensive governance mode in New Zealand, the cooperative co-management mode in Canada values and respects multiple stakeholders, and the management authority of the local self-government mode in Australia mainly belongs to the local management department. Adapting to the changes of the management system of natural protected area and political system in various countries is the reason for the difference in the mode of government-led governance of protected river areas. In the future, the construction of protected river areas in China must be based on the concept of adaptation, take into account the national conditions and the construction status of natural protected areas system, and the direction of national legislation, hierarchical management and franchising should be explored, so as to enrich and implement the planning of natural protected areas.
- protected river area (PRA),
- government-led governance,
- governance mode,
- adaptation

FullText(HTML)

References (61)

References

[1]	解钰茜,曾维华,马冰然. 基于社会网络分析的全球自然保护地治理模式研究[J]. 生态学报,2019,39(4):1394-1406.
[2]	UNEP-WCMC, IUCN, NGS. Protected planet report 2018[M]. Cambridge, Gland, Washington D.C.: UNEP-WCMC, IUCN, NGS, 2018.
[3]	MADSEN K, RAFFAN J. Wild rivers, wild lands[M]. Toronto, Ontario: Lost Moose, the Yukon Publishers, 1997.
[4]	李鹏,张端,戴向前,等. 美国荒野风景河流体系发展阶段及其主要影响因素[J]. 南水北调与水利科技,2018,16(6):178-186.
[5]	BORRINI G, KOTHARI A, OVIEDO G. Indigenous and local communities and protected areas: towards equity and enhanced conservation: guidance on policy and practice for co-managed protected areas and community conserved areas[M]. Gland, Cambridge: IUCN, 2004.
[6]	TARLOCK A D,TIPPY R. Wild and scenic rivers act of 1968[J]. Cornell L Rev,1970,55(5):707-739.
[7]	CARVER S. The river wild:towards a global assessment of wild rivers[J]. International Journal of Wilderness,2018,24(1):1-13.
[8]	HUGHEY K F,RENNIE H G,WILLIAMS N J. New Zealand's 'wild and scenic rivers':geographical aspects of 30 years of water conservation orders[J]. New Zealand Geographer,2014,70(1):22-32. doi: 10.1111/nzg.12037
[9]	SLATER L. 'Wild rivers,wild ideas':emerging political ecologies of Cape York wild rivers[J]. Environment and Planning D:Society and Space,2013,31(5):763-778. doi: 10.1068/d3012
[10]	SMITH J W,MOORE R L. Perceptions of community benefits from two wild and scenic rivers[J]. Environmental Management,2011,47(5):814-827. doi: 10.1007/s00267-011-9671-y
[11]	朱春全, 欧阳志云. IUCN自然保护地管理分类应用指南[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2016.
[12]	BORRINI G, DUDLEY N, JAEGER T, et al. Governance of protected areas: from understanding to action[M]. Gland: IUCN, 2013.
[13]	GROSS J, WATSON J, WOODLEY S, et al. Responding to climate change: guidance for protected area managers and planners[M]. Gland: IUCN, 2015.
[14]	李婧,韩锋. 自然保护地社区适应性协同管理路径研究与启示[J]. 绿色科技,2020(10):172-175. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9944.2020.10.058
[15]	王文杰,潘英姿,王明翠,等. 区域生态系统适应性管理概念、理论框架及其应用研究[J]. 中国环境监测,2007,23(2):1-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6002.2007.02.001
[16]	BUTZER K W. Adaptation to global environmental change[J]. Professional Geographer,1980,32(3):269-278. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1980.00269.x
[17]	FUTUYMA D. Evolutionary biology[M]. Sunderland, Mass: Sinauer Associates, 1979.
[18]	WILLIAMS G C. Adaptation and natural selection: a critique of some current evolutionary thought[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2018.
[19]	GALLOPIN G,GUTMAN P,MALETTA H. Global impoverishment,sustainable development and the environment:a conceptual approach[J]. International Social Science Journal,1989,41(3):375-397.
[20]	STEWARD J H. Theory of culture change: the methodology of multilinear evolution[M]. Illinois: University of Illinois Press, 1972.
[21]	尹莎,杨新军,陈佳. 人地系统适应性研究进展:概念,理论框架与方法[J]. 地理科学进展,2021,40(2):330-342. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.02.013
[22]	崔胜辉,李旋旗,李扬,等. 全球变化背景下的适应性研究综述[J]. 地理科学进展,2011,30(9):1088-1098. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.09.003
[23]	范冬萍,何德贵. 基于CAS理论的社会生态系统适应性治理进路分析[J]. 学术研究,2018(12):6-11,177.
[24]	WANG A D,SHARP N P,AGRAWAL A F. Sensitivity of the distribution of mutational fitness effects to environment,genetic background,and adaptedness:a case study with Drosophila[J]. Evolution,2014,68(3):840-853. doi: 10.1111/evo.12309
[25]	SMIT B,WANDEL J. Adaptation,adaptive capacity and vulnerability[J]. Global Environmental Change,2006,16(3):282-292. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008
[26]	陈宜瑜. 对开展全球变化区域适应研究的几点看法[J]. 地球科学进展,2004,19(4):495-499. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8166.2004.04.001
[27]	仇方道,佟连军,姜萌. 东北地区矿业城市产业生态系统适应性评价[J]. 地理研究,2011,30(2):243-255.
[28]	PELLING M. Adaptation to climate change: from resilience to transformation[M]. USA and Canada: Routledge, 2011.
[29]	SMIT B,BURTON I,KLEIN R J,et al. The science of adaptation:a framework for assessment[J]. Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change,1999,4(3):199-213.
[30]	SMIT B, BURTON I, KLEIN R J, et al. An anatomy of adaptation to climate change and variability[M]//SMIT B, BURTON I, KLEIN R J, et al. Societal adaptation to climate variability and change. Dordrecht: Springer, 2000: 223-251.
[31]	HOLLING C S, GUNDERSON L H. Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems[M]. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2002.
[32]	KLOS T B,NOOTEBOOM B. Adaptive governance:the role of loyalty[J]. IFAC Proceedings Volumes,1998,31(16):111-116. doi: 10.1016/S1474-6670(17)40467-8
[33]	River mileage classifications for components of the national wild and scenic rivers system. [EB/OL].[2021-02-28]. https://www.rivers.gov/documents/rivers-table.pdf.
[34]	李鹏,张端,赵敏,等. 自然保护地非完全中央集权政府治理模式研究−以美国荒野风景河流体系为例[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2019,18(1):60-69.
[35]	DIEDRICH J.Wild & scenic river management responsibilities[R]. Portland: Technical Report of the Interagency Wild and Scenic Rivers Coordinating Council, 2002.
[36]	BROUGHER C.The wild and scenic rivers act and federal water rights[R]. Lincoln: Congressional Research Service, 2008.
[37]	AUTHORITY N Z C. Protecting New Zealand's rivers[M]. Wellington: New Zealand Conservation Authority, 2011.
[38]	Canadian heritage rivers system strategic plan 2008-2018 [EB/OL]. [2021-02-28]. https://chrs.ca/en/strategic-plan-2008-2018.
[39]	Principles, procedures and operational guidelines（PPOG） [EB/OL]. [2021-02-28]. https://chrs.ca/en/resources/principles-procedures-and-operational-guidelines-ppog.
[40]	Parks Canada guiding principles and operational policies: part II - activity policies: Canadian heritage rivers policy [EB/OL].（2017-03-30）[2021-02-28]. https://www.pc.gc.ca/en/docs/pc/poli/princip/sec2/part2c.
[41]	Canadian heritage rivers policy-background [EB/OL].（2017-06-12）[2021-02-28]. https://www.pc.gc.ca/en/docs/pc/poli/princip/sec2/part2c/part2c1.
[42]	Canadian heritage rivers policy- technical and financial assistance [EB/OL].（2017-06-12）[2021-02-28]. https://www.pc.gc.ca/en/docs/pc/poli/princip/sec2/part2c/part2c5.
[43]	DIXON N. A framework to protect wild rivers in Queensland: the Wild Rivers Bill 2005（Qld）[M]. Queensland: Queensland Parliamentary Library, Research Publications and Resources Section, 2005.
[44]	STEIN J,STEIN J,NIX H. Wild rivers in Australia[J]. International Journal of Wilderness,2001,7(1):20-24.
[45]	KINGSFORD R T,NEVILL J. Scientists urge expansion of freshwater protected areas[J]. Ecological Management & Restoration,2005,6(3):161-162.
[46]	周语夏,刘海龙. 国际自然流淌河流保护的政策工具与成效比较[J]. 风景园林,2020,27(8):42-48.
[47]	CORBETT T, CLIFFORD C, LANE M B. Achieving indigenous involvement in management of protected areas: lessons from recent Australian experience[M]. Queensland: Centre for Australian Public Sector Management, Griffith University, 1998.
[48]	赵智聪,庄优波. 新西兰保护地规划体系评述[J]. 中国园林,2013,29(9):25-29.
[49]	王金凤,刘永,郭怀成,等. 新西兰自然保护区管理及其对中国的启示[J]. 环境保护,2006(5):75-78. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-9705.2006.05.021
[50]	王晓丽. 中国和加拿大自然保护区管理制度比较研究[J]. 世界环境,2004(1):31-36.
[51]	温战强,高尚仁,郑光美. 澳大利亚保护地管理及其对中国的启示[J]. 林业资源管理,2008(6):117-124. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6622.2008.06.025
[52]	秦天宝. 澳大利亚保护地法律与实践述评[C]//中国法学会环境资源法学研究会. 生态文明与环境资源法: 2009 年全国环境资源法学研讨会（年会）论文集.昆明: 昆明理工大学,2009: 550-555.
[53]	周林刚. 从基本权利的角度解释美国的联邦集权[J]. 学术月刊,2017,49(1):86-91.
[54]	董礼胜,曹冬英. 美国“分权-集权”钟摆运动研究[J]. 中共福建省委党校学报,2017(2):48-58.
[55]	林尚立. 国内政府间关系[M]. 杭州: 浙江人民出版社, 1998.
[56]	周奥,王瑗玲,廖蓉. 美国联邦保护地的保护措施[J]. 中国土地,2018(4):32-34.
[57]	Our system of government [EB/OL].（2013-05-01）[2021-02-28]. https://www.parliament.nz/en/visit-and-learn/how-parliament-works/our-system-of-government/.
[58]	何晓琦. 加拿大联邦主义视野下的立法权分配和宪法司法审查[J]. 法制与社会,2020(5):5-7,30.
[59]	杨雅琴. 我国政府间事权与支出责任划分再思考−基于对加拿大财政联邦主义制度安排的分析[J]. 地方财政研究,2015(5):34-39.
[60]	EAGLES P F. Governance models for parks, recreation and tourism[M]//HANNA K S, CLARK D A , SLOCOMBE D S. Transforming parks and protected areas: policy and governance in a changing world. London: Routledge, 2008: 39-61.
[61]	唐芳林. 中国特色国家公园体制建设的特征和路径[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2020,19(2):33-39.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(28)

1.	陈桂首，苏建永，王邓桥，戚剑霞，肖义发. 云南高黎贡山国家公园创建实践探索. 林业建设. 2025(01): 1-7 .
2.	丁黄昊，吴晓华. 钱江源国家公园自然教育类体验项目参与意愿影响因素调查. 中南农业科技. 2025(02): 205-211 .
3.	路秋玲，胡绪垚，范琳，贾毅立，谷洁，唐浩文，林颐，刘楠. 青海湖国家公园创建区规划体系构建. 国家公园(中英文). 2024(08): 514-523 .
4.	宋亚容，汪劲，张鸣浩. 国家公园资金投入制度的内在逻辑与立法进路. 兰州学刊. 2024(12): 106-119 .
5.	张绍云，王卫斌，洪焰泉，程希平，周俊良，李志敏，段文光，石伟，蒋桂莲，俞晓曙，黄晖，王盛弘，申进典，杨云渊. 云南省国家公园建设管理实施路径. 国家公园(中英文). 2024(09): 586-595 .
6.	吴健，韩东阳，陈绍志. 基于政策文本的国家公园内部利益联结机制探析. 世界林业研究. 2024(06): 114-120 .
7.	刘彤彤. 空间视角下国家公园建设的制度因应和完善. 现代法学. 2023(01): 63-74 .
8.	邹土春，宋小友，姜舒君，徐琦，武克壮，徐谊明，唐小平，王澍. 国家公园保护地役权管理和评估技术体系构建研究. 林业资源管理. 2023(04): 18-26 .
9.	杨杰，冉景丞，黄小龙，任晓冬，李晟之，卢凤琼. 以社区为主体的黔金丝猴生态廊道建设机制与路径分析. 贵州林业科技. 2023(04): 67-72 .
10.	宿海颖，黄金丽，王爱华. 国外国家公园社会捐赠资金管理经验及启示. 世界林业研究. 2023(06): 85-89 .
11.	刘慧媛. 基于序参量的国家公园社区人地关系优化研究：可持续生计视角. 中国园林. 2022(02): 89-92 .
12.	张玉钧. 国家公园理念中国化的探索. 人民论坛·学术前沿. 2022(04): 66-79+101 .
13.	陈君帜，叶菁，刘涛，程圩，田逸伦. 国家公园社会影响体系构建与评价——以秦岭国家公园为例. 中国园林. 2022(04): 20-25 .
14.	张西龙. 大熊猫国家公园基层管理问题及对策研究——以德阳管辖区为例. 绿色科技. 2022(07): 230-231+235 .
15.	巩丰维，徐海顺. 澳大利亚国家公园水域管理与保护研究及启示. 水利规划与设计. 2022(06): 94-99 .
16.	朱洪革，赵梦涵，陈雅如，张宇彤. 国家公园社区治理国际经验及启示. 世界林业研究. 2022(05): 1-6 .
17.	蔚东英，张弦清，陈君帜，王澍，王柏媛. 促进中国国家公园自然教育系统化建设的思考. 林草政策研究. 2022(02): 1-9 .
18.	张星烁，周大庆，邢圆. 我国10个国家公园体制试点区对比研究. 四川动物. 2022(06): 672-680 .
19.	张永红，宋冬冬，张玉波，史宏军. 自然保护地内自然资源资产特许经营的实践问题研究——以宁夏回族自治区为例分析. 领导科学论坛. 2021(01): 60-69 .
20.	李博炎，朱彦鹏，刘伟玮，李爽，付梦娣，任月恒，蔡譞，李俊生. 中国国家公园体制试点进展、问题及对策建议. 生物多样性. 2021(03): 283-289 .
21.	孙继琼，王建英，封宇琴. 大熊猫国家公园体制试点：成效、困境及对策建议. 四川行政学院学报. 2021(02): 88-95 .
22.	李博炎，李爽，朱彦鹏. 生态旅游在我国国家公园中的定位及效益研究. 生态经济. 2021(01): 111-115 .
23.	徐雷，陈静，刘莉. 我国国家公园特许经营存在问题及法律对策研究——以公益性与营利性的法律关系为分析视角. 西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2021(03): 65-71 .
24.	付潇，汪琳，朱创业. 基于CiteSpace的中国国家公园生态保护文献计量分析. 湖北农业科学. 2021(13): 5-10 .
25.	唐小平. 国家公园体制引领生物多样性主流化. 林业资源管理. 2021(04): 1-8 .
26.	樊轶侠，覃凤琴，王正早. 我国国家公园资金保障机制研究. 财政科学. 2021(09): 91-98 .
27.	蔚东英，高洁煌，李霄. 我国国家公园自然教育公众需求调查与分析. 林草政策研究. 2021(02): 55-61 .
28.	陈彩霞，曲亚辉，张艳侠，于晓红，左树锋，陆鹏，陈怡妍，夏秦超，王圆圆. 河北雾灵山自然保护区自然保护地体系建设的思考. 绿色科技. 2020(20): 47-49+52 .

Other cited types(28)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (840) PDF downloads (44) Cited by(56)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Evolution and Comparison of Government-led Governance Modes in Foreign Protected River Areas Based on the Concept of Adaptation

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(28)

Other cited types(28)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content