Evolution and Comparison of Government-led Governance Modes in Foreign Protected River Areas Based on the Concept of Adaptation

LI Peng; GAO Ya-ting; LAN Hong-mei; ZHAO Min

doi:10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2021091

Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science) > 2021 > 20(2): 80-88. > DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2021091

LI Peng, GAO Ya-ting, LAN Hong-mei, ZHAO Min. Evolution and Comparison of Government-led Governance Modes in Foreign Protected River Areas Based on the Concept of Adaptation[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2021, 20(2): 80-88. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2021091

Citation:

PDF (604 KB)

Evolution and Comparison of Government-led Governance Modes in Foreign Protected River Areas Based on the Concept of Adaptation

LI Peng^{1, 2,},
GAO Ya-ting^{1, 2},
LAN Hong-mei^{1, 2},
ZHAO Min^{2, 3, ,}

1.
School of Business and Tourism Management, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650500, P. R. China
2.
Planning and Research Center of National Park, National Park Administration of China, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Kunming, 650216, P. R. China
3.
School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650500, P. R. China

More Information

Received Date: May 19, 2021
Available Online: June 21, 2021
Published Date: June 29, 2021

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Protected river area is a special type of protected area to maintain the outstanding value of rivers, and governance by government is the main mode of management for protected river area. Adaptation aims to reduce the adverse effects by adjusting the main body to environmental changes, which can provide ideas and methods for the management of protected river areas. Based on the adaptive analysis framework, this paper compares the mode of government-led governance and evolution process of protected river areas in the United States, New Zealand, Canada and Australia from four aspects: legal policies, governance bodies, resources ownership and funding sources. The following conclusions are drawn: four different modes of government-led governance have been formed in the four national protected river areas; federal centralized management is a prominent feature of the federal-led mode in the United States, central-led and moderate decentralization is the manifestation of the comprehensive governance mode in New Zealand, the cooperative co-management mode in Canada values and respects multiple stakeholders, and the management authority of the local self-government mode in Australia mainly belongs to the local management department. Adapting to the changes of the management system of natural protected area and political system in various countries is the reason for the difference in the mode of government-led governance of protected river areas. In the future, the construction of protected river areas in China must be based on the concept of adaptation, take into account the national conditions and the construction status of natural protected areas system, and the direction of national legislation, hierarchical management and franchising should be explored, so as to enrich and implement the planning of natural protected areas.
- protected river area (PRA),
- government-led governance,
- governance mode,
- adaptation

FullText(HTML)

References (61)

References

[1]	解钰茜,曾维华,马冰然. 基于社会网络分析的全球自然保护地治理模式研究[J]. 生态学报,2019,39(4):1394-1406.
[2]	UNEP-WCMC, IUCN, NGS. Protected planet report 2018[M]. Cambridge, Gland, Washington D.C.: UNEP-WCMC, IUCN, NGS, 2018.
[3]	MADSEN K, RAFFAN J. Wild rivers, wild lands[M]. Toronto, Ontario: Lost Moose, the Yukon Publishers, 1997.
[4]	李鹏,张端,戴向前,等. 美国荒野风景河流体系发展阶段及其主要影响因素[J]. 南水北调与水利科技,2018,16(6):178-186.
[5]	BORRINI G, KOTHARI A, OVIEDO G. Indigenous and local communities and protected areas: towards equity and enhanced conservation: guidance on policy and practice for co-managed protected areas and community conserved areas[M]. Gland, Cambridge: IUCN, 2004.
[6]	TARLOCK A D,TIPPY R. Wild and scenic rivers act of 1968[J]. Cornell L Rev,1970,55(5):707-739.
[7]	CARVER S. The river wild:towards a global assessment of wild rivers[J]. International Journal of Wilderness,2018,24(1):1-13.
[8]	HUGHEY K F,RENNIE H G,WILLIAMS N J. New Zealand's 'wild and scenic rivers':geographical aspects of 30 years of water conservation orders[J]. New Zealand Geographer,2014,70(1):22-32. doi: 10.1111/nzg.12037
[9]	SLATER L. 'Wild rivers,wild ideas':emerging political ecologies of Cape York wild rivers[J]. Environment and Planning D:Society and Space,2013,31(5):763-778. doi: 10.1068/d3012
[10]	SMITH J W,MOORE R L. Perceptions of community benefits from two wild and scenic rivers[J]. Environmental Management,2011,47(5):814-827. doi: 10.1007/s00267-011-9671-y
[11]	朱春全, 欧阳志云. IUCN自然保护地管理分类应用指南[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2016.
[12]	BORRINI G, DUDLEY N, JAEGER T, et al. Governance of protected areas: from understanding to action[M]. Gland: IUCN, 2013.
[13]	GROSS J, WATSON J, WOODLEY S, et al. Responding to climate change: guidance for protected area managers and planners[M]. Gland: IUCN, 2015.
[14]	李婧,韩锋. 自然保护地社区适应性协同管理路径研究与启示[J]. 绿色科技,2020(10):172-175. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9944.2020.10.058
[15]	王文杰,潘英姿,王明翠,等. 区域生态系统适应性管理概念、理论框架及其应用研究[J]. 中国环境监测,2007,23(2):1-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6002.2007.02.001
[16]	BUTZER K W. Adaptation to global environmental change[J]. Professional Geographer,1980,32(3):269-278. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1980.00269.x
[17]	FUTUYMA D. Evolutionary biology[M]. Sunderland, Mass: Sinauer Associates, 1979.
[18]	WILLIAMS G C. Adaptation and natural selection: a critique of some current evolutionary thought[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2018.
[19]	GALLOPIN G,GUTMAN P,MALETTA H. Global impoverishment,sustainable development and the environment:a conceptual approach[J]. International Social Science Journal,1989,41(3):375-397.
[20]	STEWARD J H. Theory of culture change: the methodology of multilinear evolution[M]. Illinois: University of Illinois Press, 1972.
[21]	尹莎,杨新军,陈佳. 人地系统适应性研究进展:概念,理论框架与方法[J]. 地理科学进展,2021,40(2):330-342. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.02.013
[22]	崔胜辉,李旋旗,李扬,等. 全球变化背景下的适应性研究综述[J]. 地理科学进展,2011,30(9):1088-1098. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.09.003
[23]	范冬萍,何德贵. 基于CAS理论的社会生态系统适应性治理进路分析[J]. 学术研究,2018(12):6-11,177.
[24]	WANG A D,SHARP N P,AGRAWAL A F. Sensitivity of the distribution of mutational fitness effects to environment,genetic background,and adaptedness:a case study with Drosophila[J]. Evolution,2014,68(3):840-853. doi: 10.1111/evo.12309
[25]	SMIT B,WANDEL J. Adaptation,adaptive capacity and vulnerability[J]. Global Environmental Change,2006,16(3):282-292. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008
[26]	陈宜瑜. 对开展全球变化区域适应研究的几点看法[J]. 地球科学进展,2004,19(4):495-499. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8166.2004.04.001
[27]	仇方道,佟连军,姜萌. 东北地区矿业城市产业生态系统适应性评价[J]. 地理研究,2011,30(2):243-255.
[28]	PELLING M. Adaptation to climate change: from resilience to transformation[M]. USA and Canada: Routledge, 2011.
[29]	SMIT B,BURTON I,KLEIN R J,et al. The science of adaptation:a framework for assessment[J]. Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change,1999,4(3):199-213.
[30]	SMIT B, BURTON I, KLEIN R J, et al. An anatomy of adaptation to climate change and variability[M]//SMIT B, BURTON I, KLEIN R J, et al. Societal adaptation to climate variability and change. Dordrecht: Springer, 2000: 223-251.
[31]	HOLLING C S, GUNDERSON L H. Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems[M]. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2002.
[32]	KLOS T B,NOOTEBOOM B. Adaptive governance:the role of loyalty[J]. IFAC Proceedings Volumes,1998,31(16):111-116. doi: 10.1016/S1474-6670(17)40467-8
[33]	River mileage classifications for components of the national wild and scenic rivers system. [EB/OL].[2021-02-28]. https://www.rivers.gov/documents/rivers-table.pdf.
[34]	李鹏,张端,赵敏,等. 自然保护地非完全中央集权政府治理模式研究−以美国荒野风景河流体系为例[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2019,18(1):60-69.
[35]	DIEDRICH J.Wild & scenic river management responsibilities[R]. Portland: Technical Report of the Interagency Wild and Scenic Rivers Coordinating Council, 2002.
[36]	BROUGHER C.The wild and scenic rivers act and federal water rights[R]. Lincoln: Congressional Research Service, 2008.
[37]	AUTHORITY N Z C. Protecting New Zealand's rivers[M]. Wellington: New Zealand Conservation Authority, 2011.
[38]	Canadian heritage rivers system strategic plan 2008-2018 [EB/OL]. [2021-02-28]. https://chrs.ca/en/strategic-plan-2008-2018.
[39]	Principles, procedures and operational guidelines（PPOG） [EB/OL]. [2021-02-28]. https://chrs.ca/en/resources/principles-procedures-and-operational-guidelines-ppog.
[40]	Parks Canada guiding principles and operational policies: part II - activity policies: Canadian heritage rivers policy [EB/OL].（2017-03-30）[2021-02-28]. https://www.pc.gc.ca/en/docs/pc/poli/princip/sec2/part2c.
[41]	Canadian heritage rivers policy-background [EB/OL].（2017-06-12）[2021-02-28]. https://www.pc.gc.ca/en/docs/pc/poli/princip/sec2/part2c/part2c1.
[42]	Canadian heritage rivers policy- technical and financial assistance [EB/OL].（2017-06-12）[2021-02-28]. https://www.pc.gc.ca/en/docs/pc/poli/princip/sec2/part2c/part2c5.
[43]	DIXON N. A framework to protect wild rivers in Queensland: the Wild Rivers Bill 2005（Qld）[M]. Queensland: Queensland Parliamentary Library, Research Publications and Resources Section, 2005.
[44]	STEIN J,STEIN J,NIX H. Wild rivers in Australia[J]. International Journal of Wilderness,2001,7(1):20-24.
[45]	KINGSFORD R T,NEVILL J. Scientists urge expansion of freshwater protected areas[J]. Ecological Management & Restoration,2005,6(3):161-162.
[46]	周语夏,刘海龙. 国际自然流淌河流保护的政策工具与成效比较[J]. 风景园林,2020,27(8):42-48.
[47]	CORBETT T, CLIFFORD C, LANE M B. Achieving indigenous involvement in management of protected areas: lessons from recent Australian experience[M]. Queensland: Centre for Australian Public Sector Management, Griffith University, 1998.
[48]	赵智聪,庄优波. 新西兰保护地规划体系评述[J]. 中国园林,2013,29(9):25-29.
[49]	王金凤,刘永,郭怀成,等. 新西兰自然保护区管理及其对中国的启示[J]. 环境保护,2006(5):75-78. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-9705.2006.05.021
[50]	王晓丽. 中国和加拿大自然保护区管理制度比较研究[J]. 世界环境,2004(1):31-36.
[51]	温战强,高尚仁,郑光美. 澳大利亚保护地管理及其对中国的启示[J]. 林业资源管理,2008(6):117-124. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6622.2008.06.025
[52]	秦天宝. 澳大利亚保护地法律与实践述评[C]//中国法学会环境资源法学研究会. 生态文明与环境资源法: 2009 年全国环境资源法学研讨会（年会）论文集.昆明: 昆明理工大学,2009: 550-555.
[53]	周林刚. 从基本权利的角度解释美国的联邦集权[J]. 学术月刊,2017,49(1):86-91.
[54]	董礼胜,曹冬英. 美国“分权-集权”钟摆运动研究[J]. 中共福建省委党校学报,2017(2):48-58.
[55]	林尚立. 国内政府间关系[M]. 杭州: 浙江人民出版社, 1998.
[56]	周奥,王瑗玲,廖蓉. 美国联邦保护地的保护措施[J]. 中国土地,2018(4):32-34.
[57]	Our system of government [EB/OL].（2013-05-01）[2021-02-28]. https://www.parliament.nz/en/visit-and-learn/how-parliament-works/our-system-of-government/.
[58]	何晓琦. 加拿大联邦主义视野下的立法权分配和宪法司法审查[J]. 法制与社会,2020(5):5-7,30.
[59]	杨雅琴. 我国政府间事权与支出责任划分再思考−基于对加拿大财政联邦主义制度安排的分析[J]. 地方财政研究,2015(5):34-39.
[60]	EAGLES P F. Governance models for parks, recreation and tourism[M]//HANNA K S, CLARK D A , SLOCOMBE D S. Transforming parks and protected areas: policy and governance in a changing world. London: Routledge, 2008: 39-61.
[61]	唐芳林. 中国特色国家公园体制建设的特征和路径[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2020,19(2):33-39.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(9)

1.	谭薇，时卉，由亚男，葛守林，张鑫芮. 基于网络评价的喀纳斯景区旅游形象感知研究. 上海节能. 2025(01): 54-62 .
2.	郭丽，罗文皓，龚雪茜，张德顺. 大熊猫国家公园科普教育基地游憩适宜性评价. 四川林业科技. 2024(02): 127-134 .
3.	翟宇佳，贡若玉，陈静，霍钧资，张欣. 基于网络文本数据的上海辰山植物园及月季园游客感知分析. 园林. 2023(09): 21-28 .
4.	曾真，张丹，林润泽，陈凌艳，何天友，叶菁，郑郁善. 基于网络文本分析的旅游地意象及感知特征研究——以扬州个园为例. 西南大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(01): 194-201 .
5.	武蒙蓉. 国家公园旅游研究综述. 林业建设. 2022(02): 1-7 .
6.	呙锐，张超，黄萍. 大熊猫国家公园气象旅游发展潜力及空间分布特征研究. 旅游纵览. 2022(09): 6-11+15 .
7.	剧晓红，盛东方. 基于“手段—目的链”理论的科技报告用户需求驱动因素分析. 情报理论与实践. 2021(09): 142-148 .
8.	程刚，王鑫磊. 高原人群出行拥挤感知与调适行为研究. 交通运输研究. 2020(02): 76-82 .
9.	崔庆江，赵敏燕，唐甜甜，王丹，陈武强，陈建祥. 基于网络文本分析的大熊猫国家公园公众体验感知研究. 生态经济. 2020(11): 118-124+131 .

Other cited types(9)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (840) PDF downloads (44) Cited by(18)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Evolution and Comparison of Government-led Governance Modes in Foreign Protected River Areas Based on the Concept of Adaptation

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(9)

Other cited types(9)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content