Advanced search
Wang Jingwen. The Research of Locality Interpretation for AnShun Tunpu Settlements: A Case Study Yunshan Tunpu Settlement[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2022, 21(3): 82-89. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2021176
Citation: Wang Jingwen. The Research of Locality Interpretation for AnShun Tunpu Settlements: A Case Study Yunshan Tunpu Settlement[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2022, 21(3): 82-89. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2021176

The Research of Locality Interpretation for AnShun Tunpu Settlements: A Case Study Yunshan Tunpu Settlement

More Information
  • Received Date: May 19, 2021
  • Accepted Date: August 13, 2022
  • Available Online: August 14, 2022
  • Published Date: September 29, 2022
  • In the face of the integration and invasion of modernization in the process of globalization and urbanization, how to protect and continue the locality has become an important research topic of traditional settlements. Based on the "four-layer integrated" analysis method of human geography, this paper makes an in-depth analysis of the regional system of human-land relationship in YunshanTunpu settlement in the evolution of time and space, and makes a comprehensive interpretation of the locality of Tunpu settlement from the dimensions of local landscape, local text, local symbols and local sense. The results show that in the long development and evolution process of YunshanTunpu settlement, the four-layer integrated tourism structure based on its cultural resources replaced gradually the four-layer integratedmilitary and trade structure which have been originally formed by geographical location, natural terrain and transportation advantages, while the locality of YunshanTunpu settlement showed the continuity, overlapping and accumulation of time and space.
  • [1]
    盛婷婷,杨钊. 国外地方感研究进展与启示[J]. 人文地理,2017(4):127-135. doi: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2015.04.003
    [2]
    TUAN Y F. A study of environmental perception[M]. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1974: 1-125.
    [3]
    TUAN Y F. Space and place: the perspective of experience[M]. Min-neapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987: 19-33.
    [4]
    SEAMON D. Body-subject, time-space routines, and place-ballet in Buttimer[M]. London: Verso, 1980: 48-65.
    [5]
    LEFEBVRE H. The production of space[M]. Oxford: Brasil Blackwell, 1991: 68-168.
    [6]
    SOJA E. Postmodern geographies: the reassertion of space in critical social theory[M]. London: Verso, 1989: 76-93.
    [7]
    RELPH E. Place and placelessness[M]. London: Pion, 1976.: 2-46.
    [8]
    MASSEY D. A global sense of place in barnes: reading human geography arnold[M]. London: Pion, 1997 : 315-323.
    [9]
    沈玉立. 现代旅游背景下传统村落的地方性演变与建构−以云南大理沙溪古镇为例[D]. 昆明: 云南师范大学, 2017.
    [10]
    胡宪洋,白凯. 拉萨八廓街地方性的游客认同构建[J]. 地理学报,2015,70(10):1632-1649. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201510008
    [11]
    赵珍琪,包漪娜. 基于空间生产理论的扬州历史街区旅游商业化与地方性分析[J]. 扬州教育学院学报,2019,37(1):13-18. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-6536.2019.01.004
    [12]
    周尚意. 四层一体:发掘传统乡村地方性的方法[J]. 旅游学刊,2017,32(1):6-7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2017.01.004
    [13]
    安顺市文化局. 图像人类学视野中的安顺屯堡[M]. 贵阳: 贵州人民出版社, 2012: 10.
    [14]
    耿虹. 安顺屯堡建筑环境景观研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2009.
    [15]
    朱竑,钱俊希,陈晓亮. 地方与认同:欧美人文地理学对地方的再认识[J]. 人文地理,2016(6):1-6. doi: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2010.06.003
    [16]
    李建军. 学术视野下的屯堡文化研究[M]. 贵阳: 贵州科技出版社, 2016.
    [17]
    HARVEY D. The condition of post-modernity[M]. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1989.
    [18]
    唐顺英,周尚意. 浅析文本在地方性形成中的作用−对近年文化地理学核心刊物中相关文章的梳理[J]. 地理科学,2016,31(10):1159-1165. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2011.10.001
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 马永强,张孙博文,武耀杰,梁晶璇,郜玲云,陈佑成. 敬畏感对游客亲环境行为的影响机理研究——以武夷山国家公园为例. 林业经济. 2023(09): 77-96 .

    Other cited types(4)

Catalog

    Article views (384) PDF downloads (23) Cited by(5)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return