Advanced search
Deng Yi, Wang Nan, Gao Yan. Fiscal Authority and Expenditure Responsibility Division Reform in National Park[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2022, 21(4): 72-78. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2021214
Citation: Deng Yi, Wang Nan, Gao Yan. Fiscal Authority and Expenditure Responsibility Division Reform in National Park[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2022, 21(4): 72-78. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2021214

Fiscal Authority and Expenditure Responsibility Division Reform in National Park

More Information
  • Received Date: August 05, 2022
  • Available Online: November 20, 2022
  • Published Date: December 29, 2022
  • At present, the division of fiscal authority and expenditure responsibility of national parks in China is too rough. It is an inevitable requirement for the next reform of national park system to refine the fiscal authority and expenditure responsibility of national parks in the vertical and horizontal directions in the field of natural protected areas. The division of fiscal authority and expenditure responsibility of national parks must be economically efficient and politically reflect the principles and requirements of the unified leadership of the central government and the balanced development of local governments. This paper subdivides the fiscal authority of national parks into nine first-class authorities, and several second-class authorities and items, and then analyzes each subdivided authority and item, in accordance to authority-partitioning principles. An optimal authority mode is determined based on the Chinese nature reserve management experience of comprehensively evaluating and judging different modes such as central government fiscal authority, local government authority, shared fiscal authority between national parks and local government. The basic conclusion of the study is that, in accordance with the hierarchical management system of national parks, the national parks under the direct management of the central government are mainly the central fiscal authority and expenditure responsibility, while the national parks entrusted by the central government to provinces are mainly the common fiscal authority and expenditure responsibility of the central and local governments.
  • [1]
    钟林生,邓羽,陈田,等. 新地域空间−国家公园体制构建方案讨论[J]. 中国科学院院刊,2016,31(1):126-133. doi: 10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.2016.01.014
    [2]
    陈君帜. 建立中国国家公园体制的探讨[J]. 林业资源管理,2016(5):13-19. doi: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2016.05.003
    [3]
    彭福伟. 国家公园体制改革的进展与展望[J]. 中国机构改革与管理,2018(2):46-50.
    [4]
    唐芳林. 中国特色国家公园体制建设的特征和路径[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2020,19(2):33-39.
    [5]
    邓毅, 毛焱. 中国国家公园财政事权划分和资金机制研究[M]. 北京: 中国环境出版社, 2018.
    [6]
    秦天宝,刘彤彤. 央地关系视角下我国国家公园管理体制之建构[J]. 东岳论丛,2020,41(10):162-171. doi: 10.15981/j.cnki.dongyueluncong.2020.10.018
    [7]
    张小鹏,唐芳林. 国家公园体制建设中的事权划分探讨[J]. 林业建设,2019(3):7-10.
    [8]
    苏红巧,苏杨,王宇飞. 法国国家公园体制改革镜鉴[J]. 中国经济报告,2018(1):68-71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3788.2018.01.020
    [9]
    苏杨,胡艺馨,何思源. 加拿大国家公园体制对中国国家公园体制建设的启示[J]. 环境保护,2017,45(20):60-64. doi: 10.14026/j.cnki.0253-9705.2017.20.013
    [10]
    苏杨. 国家公园建设:先补齐生态补偿制度短板并体现国家事权[J]. 中国发展观察,2016(11):47-49. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-033X.2016.11.015
    [11]
    邓毅. 自然资源国有资产产权管理改革[C]//吴承照. 中国国家公园模式探索−2016首届生态文明与国家公园体制建设学术研讨会论文集. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2017.
    [12]
    楼继伟. 深化事权与支出责任改革 推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化[J]. 财政研究,2018(1):2-9.
    [13]
    钟林生,肖练练. 中国国家公园体制试点建设路径选择与研究议题[J]. 资源科学,2017,39(1):1-10.
    [14]
    楼继伟. 中国政府间财政关系再思考[M]. 北京: 中国财政经济出版社, 2013.
    [15]
    吴承照. 国家公园发展游憩还是发展旅游[J]. 中华环境,2020(7):32-35.
    [16]
    邓毅,高燕,蒋昕,等. 中国国家公园体制试点:地方国有旅游开发公司该何去何从[J]. 环境保护,2019,47(7):57-61. doi: 10.14026/j.cnki.0253-9705.2019.07.013

Catalog

    Article views (394) PDF downloads (26) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return