Advanced search
Zhang Yuting, Wan Lu. Can the Green New Infrastructure Help Optimize the Structure of China's Export of Forestry Environmental Goods ? Based on the Scope of Trade Products under the Belt and Road Initiative[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2022, 21(1): 56-64. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2021290
Citation: Zhang Yuting, Wan Lu. Can the Green New Infrastructure Help Optimize the Structure of China's Export of Forestry Environmental Goods ? Based on the Scope of Trade Products under the Belt and Road Initiative[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2022, 21(1): 56-64. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2021290

Can the Green New Infrastructure Help Optimize the Structure of China's Export of Forestry Environmental Goods ? Based on the Scope of Trade Products under the Belt and Road Initiative

More Information
  • Received Date: November 19, 2021
  • Accepted Date: February 20, 2022
  • Available Online: February 25, 2022
  • Published Date: March 24, 2022
  • High-quality construction of green Belt and Road Initiative is a vital way to comprehensive green transformation of social and economic development and to raise the level of green development of opening to the outside world. Firstly, based on the panel data of bilateral trade between China and the countries that jointly build Belt and Road Initiative from 2004 to 2018, this paper measures the extended margin, diversification index and product category of China's forestry environmental goods export to explore the export structure characteristics and changes of forestry environmental goods from various angles of view. On this basis, this paper introduces factors such as green new infrastructure and others to expand the bilateral trade gravity model, and makes an empirical test on the structural optimization effect of green new infrastructure on the forestry environmental goods export. The results indicate that from the perspective of product scope economy, the export scope of China's forestry environmental goods is expanding. The new green infrastructure of export destination countries can significantly improve the export scope of China's forestry environmental goods and optimize the export product structure from the view of green transformation. The new green infrastructure of export destination countries is able to positively affect extension margin and product category of export through reducing trade cost. Based on the empirical conclusion, some suggestions are put forward to promote the development of green Belt and Road Initiative, such as advancing environmental goods list, promoting green new infrastructure connectivity and giving full play to scope economic advantage of forestry environmental goods.
  • [1]
    屠新泉,刘斌. 环境产品谈判现状与中国谈判策略[J]. 国际经贸探索,2015,31(3):83-94.
    [2]
    李丽平,张彬. APEC环境产品与服务合作进程、趋势及对策[J]. 亚太经济,2014(2):67-72.
    [3]
    REHFELD K M,RENNINGS K,ZIEGLER A. Integrated product policy and environmental product innovations:an empirical analysis[J]. Ecological Economics,2007,61(1):91-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.02.003
    [4]
    卫迎春,张梅梅. 中国环境产品出口贸易影响因素的动态分析−基于CMS模型测算[J]. 国际商务研究,2017,38(1):65-74.
    [5]
    张东阳,郑学党. 两岸环境产品贸易增长因素研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2015,25(S2):51-54.
    [6]
    孙玉红,尚玉,姜宏玉. RTA中环保条款的深化与环境产品出口研究−基于APEC成员的分析[J]. 亚太经济,2021(2):55-64.
    [7]
    温珺,尤宏兵. 环境产品贸易自由化能改善发展中国家的环境质量吗[J]. 国际经贸探索,2017,33(12):22-36.
    [8]
    龚清华,张建民. 环境产品贸易自由化对进口国的效应分析[J]. 经济经纬,2014,31(1):73-78.
    [9]
    CARPENTIER C L,GALLAGHER K P,VAUGHAN S. Environmental goods and services in the world trade organization[J]. Journal of Environment & Development,2005,14(2):225-251.
    [10]
    康秀敏. APEC环境产品贸易自由化[J]. 社会科学家,2017(6):75-79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-3240.2017.06.015
    [11]
    李晓华. 面向智慧社会的“新基建”及其政策取向[J]. 改革,2020(5):34-48.
    [12]
    刘艳红,黄雪涛,石博涵. 中国“新基建”:概念、现状与问题[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2020,20(6):1-12.
    [13]
    郭朝先,王嘉琪,刘浩荣. “新基建”赋能中国经济高质量发展的路径研究[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2020,20(6):13-21.
    [14]
    郭凯明,潘珊,颜色. 新型基础设施投资与产业结构转型升级[J]. 中国工业经济,2020(3):63-80.
    [15]
    钞小静. 新型数字基础设施促进我国高质量发展的路径[J]. 西安财经大学学报,2020,33(2):15-19. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2817.2020.02.003
    [16]
    清华大学国家金融研究院绿色金融课题组. 绿色“新基建”的机遇与政策建议[J]. 银行家,2020(5):49-51.
    [17]
    曾伏娥,王克卫,虞晋钧. 产品多样化与服务质量关系研究:范围经济视角[J]. 管理评论,2017,29(10):157-167.
    [18]
    李青,韩永辉. “一带一路”区域贸易治理的文化功用:孔子学院证据[J]. 改革,2016(12):95-105.
    [19]
    [20]
    李丽平,张彬. APEC环境产品清单对中国的影响及其战略选择[J]. 上海对外经贸大学学报,2014,21(3):5-15.
    [21]
    国冬梅. 环境货物与服务贸易自由化[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2005.
    [22]
    APEC. Annex C - APEC list of environmental goods[EB/OL]. [2021-10-31]. https://www.apec.org/meeting-papers/leaders-declarations/2012/2012_aelm/2012_aelm_annexc.
    [23]
    DAVID H, PETER J, KLENOW. The Variety and quality of a nation's exports[J]. The American Economic Review,2005,95(3):704-723. doi: 10.1257/0002828054201396
    [24]
    施炳展. 中国出口增长的三元边际[J]. 经济学(季刊),2010,9(4):1311-1330.
    [25]
    LOPRESTI J. Multiproduct firms and product scope adjustment in trade[J]. Journal of International Economics,2016,100(5):160-173.
    [26]
    易靖韬,蒙双. 贸易自由化、企业异质性与产品范围调整[J]. 世界经济,2018,41(11):74-97.
    [27]
    魏昀妍,樊秀峰. “一带一路”背景下中国出口三元边际特征及其影响因素分析[J]. 国际贸易问题,2017(6):166-176.
    [28]
    钱学锋,王胜,陈勇兵. 中国的多产品出口企业及其产品范围:事实与解释[J]. 管理世界,2013(1):9-27,66.
    [29]
    张成,陆旸,郭路,等. 环境规制强度和生产技术进步[J]. 经济研究,2011,46(2):113-124.
    [30]
    陈强. 高级计量经济学及Stata应用[M]. 2版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2014.
    [31]
    国彦兵. 论杨小凯教授对国际贸易理论的贡献[J]. 国际贸易问题,2005(1):126-129.
    [32]
    温忠麟. 张雷,侯杰泰,等. 中介效应检验程序及其应用[J]. 心理学报,2004(5):614-620.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 曾鹏,唐琦. 天津市暴雨洪涝风险与城乡发展时空耦合及规划响应策略. 城市学报. 2024(06): 68-76 .
    2. 李雪丁. 福建省海洋生态灾害防控辅助决策支持系统的实现和应用. 海洋开发与管理. 2021(06): 37-41 .

    Other cited types(1)

Catalog

    Article views (687) PDF downloads (27) Cited by(3)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return