Effects of "Streamlining Administration, Delegating Powers, Improving Regulation and Services" on Wood Processing Enterprises' Export Products Quality

Chen Jianling; Lin Weiming; Dai Yongwu

doi:10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2021293

Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science) > 2023 > 22(2): 26-35. > DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2021293

Chen Jianling, Lin Weiming, Dai Yongwu. Effects of "Streamlining Administration, Delegating Powers, Improving Regulation and Services" on Wood Processing Enterprises' Export Products Quality[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2023, 22(2): 26-35. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2021293

Citation:

PDF (710 KB)

Effects of "Streamlining Administration, Delegating Powers, Improving Regulation and Services" on Wood Processing Enterprises' Export Products Quality

1.
College of Finance, Fujian Jiangxia University, Fuzhou, 350108, P. R. China
2.
Jinshan College, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, P. R. China
3.
Anxi College of Tea Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Quanzhou, 362406, P. R. China

More Information

Received Date: June 15, 2022
Available Online: April 11, 2023
Published Date: June 24, 2023

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

The literature that examines the effects of reform of "Streamlining Administration, Delegating Powers, Improving Regulation and Services" (RSDIS) on enterprises' export products quality is rare, which is not conducive to understanding the contribution of the RSDIS on the upgrading of China's export trade mode. Based on evaluation data about the RSDIS provided by the Chinese Private Enterprise Survey (CPES) 2014, as well as the cross-section data of 23 provinces, 103 prefecture level cities and 2141 wood-processing enterprises (WPEs) in 2014, this paper investigates the RSDIS's impacts on the export products quality of sample enterprises by using Tobit model. The results show that: ① the regional RSDIS has a significant role in promoting the quality upgrade of export products. ② The positive effects of regional RSDIS is attributed mainly to "streamlining administration and delegating powers" and "improving services". ③ The regional RSDIS will promote the upgrading of the quality of WPEs' export products by decreasing operating costs and reducing rent-seeking activities. ④ The regional RSDIS positively regulates the role of factors such as technological innovation, cost savings, and reduced financing difficulty in promoting the upgrading of the quality of export products of enterprises.

FullText(HTML)

References (50)

References

[1]	周其仁. 体制成本与中国经济[J]. 经济学(季刊),2017,16(3):859-876.
[2]	余长林. 知识产权保护与中国出口比较优势[J]. 管理世界,2016(6):51-66. doi: 10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2016.06.005
[3]	张占斌,孙飞. 改革开放40年:中国“放管服”改革的理论逻辑与实践探索[J]. 中国行政管理,2019(8):20-27. doi: 10.19735/j.issn.1006-0863.2019.08.01
[4]	杨青龙,张欣悦. 行政审批制度改革与中国制造业企业出口技术复杂度[J]. 国际贸易问题,2022(2):106-124. doi: 10.13510/j.cnki.jit.2022.02.007
[5]	张红霞,张哲,杨昊昌. 发展中国家的全球价值链增值能力与跨境成本[J]. 经济体制改革,2019(5):172-178.
[6]	戴翔. 营商环境优化能够提升全球价值链分工地位吗[J]. 经济理论与经济管理,2020(5):48-61. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-596X.2020.05.006
[7]	戴翔,秦思佳. 营商环境优化如何提升企业出口国内增加值率[J]. 国际贸易问题,2020(11):15-29. doi: 10.13510/j.cnki.jit.2020.11.002
[8]	刘宏,刘玉伟,陈字旺. 外商直接投资、营商环境与出口产品质量升级[J]. 当代财经,2020(11):100-112. doi: 10.13676/j.cnki.cn36-1030/f.2020.11.010
[9]	FARUQ H A,TAYLOR A C. Quality of education,economic performance and institutional environment[J]. International Advances in Economic Research,2011,17(2):224-235. doi: 10.1007/s11294-011-9293-4
[10]	ESSAJI A,FUJIWARA K. Contracting institutions and product quality[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics,2012,40(2):269-278. doi: 10.1016/j.jce.2011.07.005
[11]	李方静. 制度会影响出口质量吗?−基于跨国面板数据的经验分析[J]. 当代财经,2016(12):99-108.
[12]	FALKOWSKI J,CURZI D,OLPER A. Contracting institutions,agro-food trade and product quality[J]. Journal of Agricultural Economics,2019,70(3):749-770. doi: 10.1111/1477-9552.12314
[13]	邓国营,宋跃刚,吴耀国. 中间品进口、制度环境与出口产品质量升级[J]. 南方经济,2018(8):84-106. doi: 10.19592/j.cnki.scje.351550
[14]	胡国恒,赵雪婷. 制度环境、契约密集度与制造业出口产品质量−基于微观数据的研究[J]. 国际经贸探索,2018,34(8):4-18.
[15]	胡大猛,钟昌标,黄远浙. 融资约束、制度环境和出口产品质量[J]. 中国发展,2019,19(3):20-32. doi: 10.15885/j.cnki.cn11-4683/z.2019.03.005
[16]	杨逢珉,程凯. 贸易便利化对出口产品质量的影响研究[J]. 世界经济研究,2019(1):95-106,139. doi: 10.13516/j.cnki.wes.2019.01.008
[17]	唐丹丹,阮伟华. 政府补贴提高了企业出口产品质量吗−基于地区制度条件下的分析[J]. 国际经贸探索,2019,35(6):49-66.
[18]	张雨,戴翔. FDI、制度质量与服务出口复杂度[J]. 财贸研究,2017,28(7):59-68,76. doi: 10.19337/j.cnki.34-1093/f.2017.07.006
[19]	郑展鹏,岳帅. 制度质量、人口结构与出口技术复杂度[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2020,22(2):70-78.
[20]	韩安民. 制度环境是否提高了出口技术复杂度?−来自29个国家的证据[J]. 国际经济合作,2021(2):29-40.
[21]	段文奇,刘晨阳. 贸易便利化、企业异质性与多产品企业出口[J]. 国际贸易问题,2020(5):72-88. doi: 10.13510/j.cnki.jit.2020.05.006
[22]	杨继军,刘依凡,李宏亮. 贸易便利化、中间品进口与企业出口增加值[J]. 财贸经济,2020,41(4):115-128. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-8102.2020.04.008
[23]	李丹,武杰. 贸易便利化、出口国内增加值与企业出口行为选择−基于地级市工业企业数据的分析[J]. 哈尔滨商业大学学报(社会科学版),2022(1):25-41. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7112.2022.01.003
[24]	李谷成,魏诗洁,范丽霞. 贸易便利化对农产品出口技术复杂度的影响研究−来自中国和“一带一路”沿线国家(或地区)的经验证据[J]. 农业经济与管理,2020(6):86-96. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9189.2020.06.009
[25]	武杰,李丹. 贸易便利化与中国全球价值链地位攀升−基于服务要素投入视角的分析[J]. 技术经济与管理研究,2021(10):92-97. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-292X.2021.10.017
[26]	邓悦,郑汉林,郅若平. “放管服”改革对企业经营绩效的影响−来自中国企业-劳动力匹配调查(CEES)的经验证据[J]. 改革,2019(8):128-139.
[27]	毕思斌,张劲松. 论政商关系互动的演变过程与路径重塑−兼评"放管服"改革对政商关系的影响[J]. 河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,47(3):46-51.
[28]	张杰,翟福昕,周晓艳. 政府补贴、市场竞争与出口产品质量[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究,2015(4):71-87. doi: 10.13653/j.cnki.jqte.2015.04.005
[29]	HAUSMANN R,HWANG J,RODRIK D. What you export matters[J]. Journal of Economic Growth,2007,12(1):1-25. doi: 10.1007/s10887-006-9009-4
[30]	辛大楞,辛立国. 营商环境与企业产品质量升级−基于腐败视角的分析[J]. 财贸研究,2019,30(3):89-102.
[31]	BERNARD A B,REDDING S J,SCHOTT P K. Multiproduct firms and trade liberalization[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2011,126(3):1271-1318. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjr021
[32]	HALLAK J C,SIVADASAN J. Product and process productivity:implications for quality choice and conditional exporter premia[J]. Journal of International Economics,2013,91(1):53-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2013.05.001
[33]	GROSSMAN G M, HELPMAN E. Innovation and growth in the global economy[M]. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1993.
[34]	KHANDELWAL A. The long and short (of) quality ladders[J]. The Review of Economic Studies,2010,77(4):1450-1476. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2010.00602.x
[35]	祝树金,谢煜,段凡. 制造业服务化、技术创新与企业出口产品质量[J]. 经济评论,2019,220(6):5-18. doi: 10.19361/j.er.2019.06.01
[36]	BRODA C,WEINSTEIN D E. Product creation and destruction:evidence and price implications[J]. American Economic Review,2010,100:691-723. doi: 10.1257/aer.100.3.691
[37]	申宇,黄昊,赵玲. 地方政府“创新崇拜”与企业专利泡沫[J]. 科研管理,2018,39(4):83-91. doi: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2018.04.009
[38]	符颖莹. 制度性交易成本与企业绩效的关系研究[D]. 南京: 江苏科技大学, 2019.
[39]	董银果,刘雪梅. 不稳定环境下中国出口农产品的质量演变[J]. 华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2019,18(6):84-95. doi: 10.7671/j.issn.1672-0202.2019.06.008
[40]	杨海生,陈少凌,罗党论,等. 政策不稳定性与经济增长−来自中国地方官员变更的经验证据[J]. 管理世界,2014(9):13-28,187-188.
[41]	耿曙,庞保庆,钟灵娜. 中国地方领导任期与政府行为模式:官员任期的政治经济学[J]. 经济学(季刊),2016,15(3):893-916.
[42]	徐业坤,马光源. 地方官员变更与企业产能过剩[J]. 经济研究,2019,54(5):129-145.
[43]	BARON R M,KENNY D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:conceptual,strategic,and statistical considerations[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1986,51(6):1173-1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
[44]	SOBEL M E. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models[J]. Sociological Methodology,1982(13):290-312.
[45]	MACKINNON D P,LOCKWOOD C M,HOFFMAN J M,et al. A comparison of methods to test the mediation and other intervening variable effects[J]. Psychological Methods,2002,8(1):1-35.
[46]	方杰,张敏强. 中介效应的点估计和区间估计:乘积分布法、非参数Bootstrap和MCMC法[J]. 心理学报,2012,44(10):1408-1420.
[47]	温忠麟,叶宝娟. 中介效应分析:方法和模型发展[J]. 心理科学进展,2014,22(5):731-745.
[48]	林伟明,陈建铃,郑义,等. 中国造纸企业出口增长:创新驱动还是要素驱动?[J]. 林业经济,2019,41(10):33-38,70. doi: 10.13843/j.cnki.lyjj.2019.10.005
[49]	施炳展,邵文波. 中国企业出口产品质量测算及其决定因素−培育出口竞争新优势的微观视角[J]. 管理世界,2014(9):90-106.
[50]	魏下海,董志强,张永璟. 营商制度环境为何如此重要?−来自民营企业家"内治外攘"的经验证据[J]. 经济科学,2015(2):105-116.

Cited By

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (249) PDF downloads (15)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Effects of "Streamlining Administration, Delegating Powers, Improving Regulation and Services" on Wood Processing Enterprises' Export Products Quality

Abstract

References

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content