Mechanism Analysis of the Influence of Environmental Values on Low-Carbon Production Behavior of Family Farms: TPB-VBN Integration Model

Zhang Yuanyuan; Yang Chenyujing; Geng Lili; Xue Yongji

doi:10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2022122

Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science) > 2023 > 22(3): 64-75. > DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2022122

Zhang Yuanyuan, Yang Chenyujing, Geng Lili, Xue Yongji. Mechanism Analysis of the Influence of Environmental Values on Low-Carbon Production Behavior of Family Farms: TPB-VBN Integration Model[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2023, 22(3): 64-75. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2022122

Citation:

PDF (793 KB)

Mechanism Analysis of the Influence of Environmental Values on Low-Carbon Production Behavior of Family Farms: TPB-VBN Integration Model

School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, 100083, P. R. China

More Information

Received Date: August 31, 2022
Available Online: August 06, 2023
Published Date: September 24, 2023

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Exploring the internal logic of low-carbon production behavior of family farms, as a consensual subject to promote the low-carbon transformation of agriculture, is of great significance to the high-quality development of agriculture. Based on the survey data of 472 family farms in Jiangsu Province, the mechanism of environmental values on low-carbon production behavior of family farms was explored using structural equation modelling based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) and the Values-Beliefs-Norms (VBN) theory. The results show that:①Environmental values have no direct significant effect on the low-carbon production behavior of family farms, while the former has a complete mediating effect on the latter.②The relationship between environmental values and the low-carbon production behavior of family farms is affected by several mediating variables, such as the environmental identity, individual norm, subjective norm, and so on.③The TPB-VBN integration model mechanism can effectively reveal the role of environmental values on the low-carbon production behavior of family farms. ④The mechanism of environmental values on low-carbon production behavior of family farms varies according to the goal orientation of the farms, and environmental identity, perceived behavioral control and environmental values play major roles in family farms oriented to reputation building, economic benefits and sustainable development, respectively.
- family farm,
- environmental values,
- low carbon production behavior,
- TPB-VBN integration model

FullText(HTML)

References (41)

References

[1]	綦慧心. 家庭农场的作用解析与发展方略[J]. 农业经济,2019,38(7):20-21.
[2]	金书秦,张哲晰,胡钰,等. 中国农业绿色转型的历史逻辑、理论阐释与实践探索[J]. 农业经济问题,2023(7):1-16.
[3]	CODERONI S,VANINO S. The farm-by-farm relationship among carbon productivity and economic performance of agriculture[J]. Science of The Total Environment,2022,819:153103. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153103
[4]	MORGAN-DAVIES C,KYLE J,BOMAN I A,et al. A comparison of farm labour,profitability,and carbon footprint of different management strategies in Northern European grassland sheep systems[J]. Agricultural Systems,2021,191(4):103155.
[5]	蔡颖萍,杜志雄. 家庭农场生产行为的生态自觉性及其影响因素分析:基于全国家庭农场监测数据的实证检验[J]. 中国农村经济,2016,31(12):33-45.
[6]	蔡荣,汪紫钰,钱龙,等. 加入合作社促进了家庭农场选择环境友好型生产方式吗?:以化肥、农药减量施用为例[J]. 中国农村观察,2019,39(1):51-65.
[7]	孔庆洋,闵继胜. 风险、技术与中国新型农业经营主体化肥使用量[J]. 安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2020,48(6):87-97.
[8]	BORYCHOWSKI M,GRZELAK A,POPLAWSKI L. What drives low-carbon agriculture? the experience of farms from the Wielkopolska region in Poland[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2022,29(13):18641-18652. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17022-3
[9]	高杨,赵端阳,于丽丽. 家庭农场绿色防控技术政策偏好与补偿意愿[J]. 资源科学,2019,41(10):1837-1848.
[10]	曹铁毅,王雪琪,邹伟. 家庭农场测土配方施肥行为分析:基于人力资本和社会资本禀赋[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2020,34(5):117-123.
[11]	石志恒,崔民,张衡. 基于扩展计划行为理论的农户绿色生产意愿研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2020,34(3):40-48.
[12]	王世进,周慧颖. 环境价值观影响生态消费行为:基于中介变量的实证检验[J]. 软科学,2019,33(10):50-57.
[13]	曹慧,赵凯. 农户化肥减量施用意向影响因素及其效应分解:基于VBN-TPB的实证分析[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2018,37(6):29-38,152.
[14]	陈强强. 重点生态功能区农牧民草原保护的生态认知、意愿与形成机制:基于TPB与VBN整合模型[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2023,37(2):34-41.
[15]	周小梅,范鸿飞. 区域声誉可激励农产品质量安全水平提升吗?:基于浙江省丽水区域品牌案例的研究[J]. 农业经济问题,2017(4):85-92,112.
[16]	仇焕广,栾昊,李瑾,等. 风险规避对农户化肥过量施用行为的影响[J]. 中国农村经济,2014,29(3):85-96.
[17]	汤青,李扬,陈明星,等. 半城镇化农民可持续生计与农村可持续发展:理论框架、研究进展及未来展望[J]. 地理科学进展,2018,37(8):1022-1030.
[18]	何嘉梅,尹杰. 环境保护身份认同影响环境决策的心理加工机制[J]. 心理研究,2022,15(2):152-159.
[19]	李芬妮,张俊飚,何可. 农户外出务工、村庄认同对其参与人居环境整治的影响[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2020,30(12):185-192.
[20]	和占琼,王婷. 出行习惯和感知质量对低碳通勤出行行为的影响研究[J]. 生态经济,2020,36(7):105-112.
[21]	STERN P C,DIETZ T,ABEL T,et al. A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements:the case of environmentalism[J]. Human Ecology Review,1999,6(2):81-97.
[22]	周玮. 基于TPB-VBN的城市居民生活垃圾计量缴费意愿及其影响因素研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2019.
[23]	石志恒,张衡. 基于扩展价值-信念-规范理论的农户绿色生产行为研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2020,34(8):96-102.
[24]	L L,G Y,G X,et al. Exploring the residents' intention to separate MSW in Beijing and understanding the reasons:an explanation by extended VBN theory[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society,2018,37:637-648. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2017.11.036
[25]	AJZEN I. The theory of planned behavior[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1991,50(2):179-211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
[26]	刘梦娇. 农户低碳经营行为的路径分析: 以武汉市江夏区和咸宁市通山县为例[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2019.
[27]	冯潇,薛永基,刘欣禺. 生态知识对林区农户生态保护行为影响的实证研究:生态情感与责任意识的中间作用[J]. 资源开发与市场,2017,33(3):284-288,294.
[28]	BAMBERG S,HUNECKE M,BLÖBAUM A. Social context,personal norms and the use of public transportation:two field studies[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology,2007,27(3):190-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.04.001
[29]	王丽丽,张晓杰. 城市居民参与环境治理行为的影响因素分析:基于计划行为和规范激活理论[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2017,18(6):92-98.
[30]	NOPPERS E H,KEIZER K,BOLDERDIJK J W,et al. The adoption of sustainable innovations:driven by symbolic and environmental motives[J]. Global Environmental Change,2014,25:52-62. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.01.012
[31]	WANG B,WANG X,GUO D,et al. Analysis of factors influencing residents' habitual energy-saving behaviour based on NAM and TPB models:egoism or altruism?[J]. Energy Policy,2018,116:68-77. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.055
[32]	RUEPERT A M,KEIZER K,STEG L. The relationship between corporate environmental responsibility,employees' biospheric values and pro-environmental behaviour at work[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology,2017,54:65-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.10.006
[33]	STEG L,VLEK C. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour:an integrative review and research agenda[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology,2009,29(3):309-317. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
[34]	MANCHA R M,YODER C Y. Cultural antecedents of green behavioral intent:an environmental theory of planned behavior[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology,2015,43:145-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.005
[35]	WOOD W,RÜNGER D. Psychology of habit[J]. Annual Review of Psychology,2016,67:289-314. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033417
[36]	GKARGKAVOUZI A,HALKOS G,MATSIORI S. Environmental behavior in a private-sphere context:integrating theories of planned behavior and value belief norm,self-identity and habit[J]. Resources,Conservation and Recycling,2019,148:145-156.
[37]	YUN T,ZHANG J,HE Y. Research on spatial-temporal characteristics and driving factor of agricultural carbon emissions in China[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture,2014,13(6):1393-1403. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60624-3
[38]	BABBLE E R. The practice of social research[M]. 14th. Boston, Massachusetts: Wadsworth Publishing, 2015: 50-56.
[39]	郜亮亮. 中国种植类家庭农场的土地形成及使用特征:基于全国31省(自治区、直辖市)2014-2018年监测数据[J]. 管理世界,2020,36(4):181-195.
[40]	何可,汪昊,张俊飚. “双碳”目标下的农业转型路径:从市场中来到“市场”中去[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2022,41(1):1-9.
[41]	王晓楠. 阶层认同、环境价值观对垃圾分类行为的影响机制[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2019,21(3):57-66.

Cited By

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (262) PDF downloads (57)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Mechanism Analysis of the Influence of Environmental Values on Low-Carbon Production Behavior of Family Farms: TPB-VBN Integration Model

Abstract

References

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content