Advanced search
Wu Lihong. Multi-disciplinary Paradigms of "Ecology+" Research in the Field of Humanities and Social Sciences[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2024, 23(2): 125-130. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2023019
Citation: Wu Lihong. Multi-disciplinary Paradigms of "Ecology+" Research in the Field of Humanities and Social Sciences[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2024, 23(2): 125-130. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2023019

Multi-disciplinary Paradigms of "Ecology+" Research in the Field of Humanities and Social Sciences

More Information
  • Received Date: April 19, 2023
  • Accepted Date: November 29, 2023
  • Available Online: November 30, 2023
  • Humans once paid too much attention to and pursued the maximization of their own profits, ignoring the laws of nature, which led to the tension between man and nature, and the ecological environment crises of ecosystem degradation, environmental pollution and lack of biodiversity appeared. In the new century, humans are increasingly aware that only by establishing a new concept of survival, respecting, conforming to and protecting nature can sustainable development be achieved. Therefore, the study of "ecology" has attracted the attention of all sectors of society and become one of the hot topics of research and discussion. Through extensive research, this paper analyzes the research paradigms of the four important disciplines of "ecology + social thought", "ecology + literature", "ecology + linguistics", and "ecology+translation" in the field of humanities and social sciences, with the aim of providing readers with a macro-map of "ecological+" research, highlighting the concerns of the scholars of the humanities and social sciences for social development and ecological protection, and also providing multi-dimensional and multi-level insights for addressing the eco-challenges.

  • [1]
    荀利波. 文学生态学研究:基于学术史梳理的讨论[J]. 文艺评论,2017(12):66-76.
    [2]
    胡锦涛在中国共产党第十七次全国代表大会上的报告(全文)[EB/OL]. (2007-10-25) [2022-06-11]. http://cpc.people.com.cn/GB/104019/104101/6429414.html.
    [3]
    胡锦涛在中国共产党第十八次全国代表大会上的报告(全文)[EB/OL]. (2012-11-18) [2022-06-11]. http://politics.people.com.cn/n/2012/1118/c1001-19612670-2.html.
    [4]
    习近平在中国共产党第十九次全国代表大会上的报告[EB/OL]. (2017-10-28) [2022-06-11]. http://cpc.people.com.cn/n1/2017/1028/c64094-29613660.html.
    [5]
    习近平出席全国生态环境保护大会并发表重要讲话[EB/OL]. (2018-05-19)[2022-06-11]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2018-05/19/content_5292116.html.
    [6]
    习近平:共同构建人与自然生命共同体[EB/OL]. (2021-04-23) [2023-02-01]. http://www.xinhuanet.com/mrdx/2021-04/23/c_139901359.htm.
    [7]
    许勤华. 读解二十大报告:中国生态文明建设为人民谋幸福,为世界谋发展[EB/OL]. (2022-10-26) [2023-02-01]. http://www.china.com.cn/opinion2020/2022-10/26/content_78485962.shtml.
    [8]
    刘涵. 习近平生态文明思想研究[D]. 长沙:湖南师范大学,2019:Ⅱ.
    [9]
    朱新福. 美国生态文学批评述略[J]. 当代外国文学,2003(1):135-140.
    [10]
    尹雪梅,廖才高. 生态文学:西方批判文学的新范式[J]. 求索,2008(6):184-186.
    [11]
    龙其林. 非人类中心膜拜、生态批评泛化及思想主题癖:对当前国内生态文学研究中常见问题的批评[J]. 青海社会科学,2018(40):159-184.
    [12]
    黄知常,舒解生. 生态语言学:语言学研究的新视角[J]. 南华大学学报 ( 社会科学版),2004(2):68-72.
    [13]
    王宏军. 论生态语言学的研究范式[J]. 外国语文,2019(4):84-89.
    [14]
    段李敏. 生态语言学的渊源及研究范式[J]. 跨语言文化研究(第9辑),2016(1):92-100.
    [15]
    马俊杰. 生态语言学研究中的“认知范式”[J]. 外国语言文学,2018(5):472-481.
    [16]
    胡庚申. 翻译适应选择论[M]. 武汉:湖北教育出版社,2004.
    [17]
    王宁. 生态翻译学:一种人文学术研究范式的兴起[J]. 外语教学,2021(6):7-11.
    [18]
    胡庚申. 生态翻译学解读[J]. 中国翻译,2008(6):11-15.
    [19]
    胡庚申. 生态翻译学:产生的背景与研究基础[J]. 外语研究,2010(4):62-67.
    [20]
    胡庚申. 生态翻译学研究的焦点与理论视角[J]. 中国翻译,2011(2):5-9.
    [21]
    胡庚申. 生态翻译学:建构与诠释[M]. 北京:商务印书馆,2013.
    [22]
    胡庚申. 若干生态翻译学视角的应用翻译研究[J]. 上海翻译,2017(5):1-5.
    [23]
    胡庚申. 翻译研究“生态范式”的理论建构[J]. 中国翻译,2019(4):24-33.
    [24]
    胡庚申,罗迪江. 生态翻译学话语体系构建的问题意识与理论自觉[J]. 上海翻译,2021(5):11-16.
    [25]
    武立红. 生态翻译学“领着说”的脉动线路图[C]//吴江梅,鞠方安,彭工. 现代外语教学与研究(2019). 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2019:325-331.
    [26]
    CRONIN M. Eco-translation:translation and ecology in the age of the Anthropocene[M]. London,New York:Routledge,2017.
    [27]
    武立红. 中西生态翻译研究2.0范式之同名异质:兼《生态翻译:人类世时代的翻译与生态学》述评[C]//吴江梅,鞠方安,彭工. 现代外语教学与研究(2020). 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2020:320-326.
  • Related Articles

    [1]Liu Peipei, Bai Wanting, Hou Jian, Chen Jiancheng. Research on the Mechanism of Rural Industry Integration Enabled by Digital Countryside under the Background of Rural Revitalization[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science). DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2024011
    [2]Xu feng, Wang Lihong, Hao Zhengchun. Evaluation and Comparative Study on the Benefits of Bamboo Industry Development under the Perspective of Comprehensive Land Consolidation[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science). DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2024115
    [3]Liu Huan, Gong Qianwen. The Logic and Path of the Revitalization of Rural Culture[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2024, 23(4): 77-85. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2023211
    [4]Yang Mengran, He Chao. The Internal Demand and Supply Features of Rural Revitalization Policies: An Quantitative Analysis Based on Texts of Agriculture-related Policy Documents from 2013—2023[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2024, 23(2): 52-59. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2023034
    [5]GAO Lei, REN Yuan-biao, WANG Tie-long, SONG Wei-ming. The Multi-agent Collaborative Model of Regional Brand of Forest Food Under the Background of Rural Revitalization[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2021, 20(3): 65-72. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2020188
    [6]HUANG Jia-hui, WANG Lan-hui. The Impact of Tourism Investment on the Economic Benefit of Rural Tourism Under the Background of Rural Revitalization[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2021, 20(1): 47-51. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2020122
    [7]XIE Chen, WANG Lan-hui, XIE Hong. Increase Efficiency and Keep Equity: Some Thoughts on Deepening Collective Forestry Tenure Reform Based on“Four Schools of Tenure Right”[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2020, 19(1): 22-30. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2019149
    [8]GAO Kai, ZHANG Bao-wen, GAO Yang. Agricultural Heritage System Research from the Perspective of Landscape Architecture[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2019, 18(4): 34-39. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2019052
    [9]WANG Nan-xi, WANG Le-jun, LI Xiong. Overview of British Modern Landscape Architecture[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2012, 11(2): 70-73.
    [10]YUAN Qing-lei, YU Xiao-nan. Integration of Couplet and Landscape Architecture in China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2010, 9(3): 58-62.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 柯祯,刘敏. 旅游解说研究进展与差异分析. 旅游学刊. 2019(02): 120-136 .
    2. 张德顺,王伟霞,刘红权,刘鸣,宋奎银. 植物园规划创新模式探索. 风景园林. 2016(12): 113-120 .

    Other cited types(8)

Catalog

    Article views (180) PDF downloads (587) Cited by(10)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return