Advanced search
Shen Qiaojun, Lin Weixing, Li Huajing, Zheng Yi, Dai Yongwu. Configuration Study of Influencing Factors of Corporate Green Transition Based on WSR Methodology[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2025, 24(1): 41-48. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2023098
Citation: Shen Qiaojun, Lin Weixing, Li Huajing, Zheng Yi, Dai Yongwu. Configuration Study of Influencing Factors of Corporate Green Transition Based on WSR Methodology[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2025, 24(1): 41-48. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2023098

Configuration Study of Influencing Factors of Corporate Green Transition Based on WSR Methodology

More Information
  • Received Date: May 17, 2023
  • Available Online: December 01, 2024
  • Based on the WSR methodology, this paper uses 80 manufacturing companies listed in Shanghai and Shenzhen A-shares as research samples, and uses fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis to explore the green transition mechanisms of manufacturing enterprises. The results show that there exist three high-level green transition paths, i.e., flexible and change-oriented path, structural balance path, and government-supported path; and two low-level green transition paths, i.e., stagnant path, and monopolistic and profit-oriented path. The study finds that financial flexibility is particularly important for the green transition of enterprises. In the strategic decision-making process of green transition in large enterprises, government subsidies can effectively motivate strategic managers' willingness to pursue green transition. Because of the capacity paradox dilemma, large firms with high levels of equity balance will cater to the conservative goals of small-sized and medium-sized shareholders once they lack the financial flexibility or the liquidity advantage of government subsidies. Companies with low levels of equity balance are prone to fall into the trap of "shareholder negativism", both of which will lead to inefficient green transition outcomes.

  • [1]
    吴守蓉,欧阳宇桢. 困境与破局:新时代生态文明建设取得重大成就的理论与实践逻辑[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2022,21(4):1-8.
    [2]
    于连超,毕茜,张卫国. 工业企业绿色转型评价体系构建[J]. 统计与决策,2019,35(14):186-188.
    [3]
    WARATHIDA C,MIGUEL E,YASUKO K. Why go green? discourse analysis of motivations for Thailand's oil and gas companies to invest in renewable energy[J]. Energy Policy,2018,120(9):448-459.
    [4]
    TOBIAS S,MARTIN W,SPYROS A,et al. How different policy instruments affect green product innovation:a differentiated perspective[J]. Energy Policy,2018,114(3):245-261.
    [5]
    于连超,张卫国,毕茜. 环境税对企业绿色转型的倒逼效应研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2019,29(7):112-120.
    [6]
    苏涛永,孟丽,张金涛. 中国碳市场试点与企业绿色转型:作用效果与机理分析[J]. 研究与发展管理,2022,34(4):81-96.
    [7]
    JENS H,CHRISTIAN R. Energy transition in Germany and regional spill-overs:the diffusion of renewable energy in firms[J]. Energy Policy,2018,121(10):404-414.
    [8]
    邢丽云,俞会新,任相伟. 网络嵌入、绿色动态能力与企业绿色创新:环境规制和管理者环境注意力的调节作用[J]. 科技进步与对策,2022,39(14):105-113.
    [9]
    BRANDT U S,SVENDSEN G T. When can a green entrepreneur manage the local environment?[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2016,183(3):622-629.
    [10]
    TING K,TAIWEN F,CHUNMING Y,et al. Advanced manufacturing technologies and green innovation:the role of internal environmental collaboration[J]. Sustainability,2016,8(10):1-18.
    [11]
    潘持春,王菲. 数字赋能如何影响企业绿色转型?——绿色创新能力与组织惰性的双重影响分析[J]. 南京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2022,21(4):89-100. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7287.2022.04.008
    [12]
    黄光球,张文. 高质量发展视角下重污染企业转型升级路径[J]. 生态经济,2021,37(9):40-51.
    [13]
    任相伟,孙丽文,邢丽云. 基于根因分析法的中国企业绿色转型驱动因素的研究:主次因素的有效识别与排列[J]. 南京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2021,20(4):99-108. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7287.2021.04.012
    [14]
    孙传旺,张文悦. 对外直接投资与企业绿色转型:基于中国企业微观数据的经验研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2022,32(9):79-91. doi: 10.12062/cpre.20220432
    [15]
    顾基发,唐锡晋,朱正祥. 物理-事理-人理系统方法论综述[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息,2007(6):51-60. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6744.2007.06.007
    [16]
    寇晓东,顾基发. 物理-事理-人理系统方法论25周年回顾:溯源、释义、比较与前瞻[J]. 管理评论,2021,33(5):3-14.
    [17]
    JOURDAN J K I. Too much of a good thing? the dual effect of public sponsorship on organizational performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2017,60(1):1-23. doi: 10.5465/amj.2017.4001
    [18]
    李新安. 环境规制、政府补贴与区域绿色技术创新[J]. 经济经纬,2021,38(3):14-23.
    [19]
    ÖZGE Ö,BENJAMIN F H,MARIT V H,et al. Capacity vs energy subsidies for promoting renewable investment:benefits and costs for the EU power market[J]. Energy Policy,2020,137(1):1-14.
    [20]
    孔伟杰. 制造业企业转型升级影响因素研究:基于浙江省制造业企业大样本问卷调查的实证研究[J]. 管理世界,2012(9):120-131.
    [21]
    SCHREYOEGG G K M. How dynamic can organizational capabilities be? towards a dual-process model of capability dynamization[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2007,28(9):913-933. doi: 10.1002/smj.613
    [22]
    孟晓斌,王重鸣,杨建锋. 企业动态能力理论模型研究综述[J]. 外国经济与管理,2007(10):9-16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4950.2007.10.002
    [23]
    曾爱民,傅元略,魏志华. 金融危机冲击、财务柔性储备和企业融资行为:来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 金融研究,2011(10):155-169.
    [24]
    蓝海林. 中国企业战略行为的解释:一个整合情境-企业特征的概念框架[J]. 管理学报,2014,11(5):653-658. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2014.05.005
    [25]
    孙海波,刘忠璐. 环境规制、清洁技术创新与中国工业绿色转型[J]. 科研管理,2021,42(11):54-61.
    [26]
    杨仁发,李娜娜. 环境规制与中国工业绿色发展:理论分析与经验证据[J]. 中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2019,19(5):79-91.
    [27]
    蒋煦涵. 国有企业混改的股权制衡机制研究:基于东航物流和延长壳牌的双案例分析[J]. 当代财经,2022(11):87-99.
    [28]
    TOSHIYUKI S,YAN Y. Comparison among U. S. industrial sectors by DEA environmental assessment:equipped with analytical capability to handle zero or negative in production factors[J]. Energy Economics,2015,52(2):69-86.
    [29]
    王旭,王兰. 难辞其咎的大股东:绿色创新导向下政府补贴对绿色创新驱动乏力的新解释[J]. 研究与发展管理,2020,32(2):24-36.
    [30]
    李姝,翟士运,古朴. 非控股股东参与决策的积极性与企业技术创新[J]. 中国工业经济,2018(7):155-173.
    [31]
    杜运周,贾良定. 组态视角与定性比较分析(QCA):管理学研究的一条新道路[J]. 管理世界,2017(6):155-167. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2017.06.011
    [32]
    杜运周,李佳馨,刘秋辰,等. 复杂动态视角下的组态理论与QCA方法:研究进展与未来方向[J]. 管理世界,2021,37(3):180-197. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2021.03.012
    [33]
    张驰,郑晓杰,王凤彬. 定性比较分析法在管理学构型研究中的应用:述评与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理,2017,39(4):68-83.
    [34]
    吴建祖,范会玲. 基于组态视角的企业绿色创新驱动模式研究[J]. 研究与发展管理,2021,33(4):41-53.
    [35]
    中国社会科学院工业经济研究所课题组,李平. 中国工业绿色转型研究[J]. 中国工业经济,2011(4):5-14.
    [36]
    卢强,吴清华,周永章,等. 广东省工业绿色转型升级评价的研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2013,23(7):34-41. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2013.07.006
    [37]
    沈能,刘凤朝. 高强度的环境规制真能促进技术创新吗?——基于“波特假说”的再检验[J]. 中国软科学,2012(4):49-59. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2012.04.006
    [38]
    花贵如,刘志远,许骞. 投资者情绪、企业投资行为与资源配置效率[J]. 会计研究,2010(11):49-55. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2010.11.008
    [39]
    肖忠意,林琳,陈志英,等. 财务柔性能力与中国上市公司持续性创新:兼论协调创新效应与自适应效应[J]. 统计研究,2020,37(5):82-93.
    [40]
    周瑜胜,宋光辉. 公司控制权配置、行业竞争与研发投资强度[J]. 科研管理,2016,37(12):122-131.
    [41]
    张明,陈伟宏,蓝海林. 中国企业“凭什么”完全并购境外高新技术企业:基于94个案例的模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)[J]. 中国工业经济,2019(4):117-135.
    [42]
    吴琴,张骁,王乾,等. 创业导向、战略柔性及国际化程度影响企业绩效的组态分析[J]. 管理学报,2019,16(11):1632-1639. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2019.11.007
    [43]
    张明,杜运周. 组织与管理研究中QCA方法的应用:定位、策略和方向[J]. 管理学报,2019,16(9):1312-1323. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2019.09.005
    [44]
    程聪,贾良定. 我国企业跨国并购驱动机制研究:基于清晰集的定性比较分析[J]. 南开管理评论,2016,19(6):113-121. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2016.06.012
    [45]
    FISS P C. Building better causal theories:a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2011,54(2):393-420. doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.60263120

Catalog

    Article views (64) PDF downloads (14) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return