Advanced search
Yang Fan. A Brief Discussion on the Agricultural and Forestry Artifacts of the Funeral Ritual System in the Three Rites[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2023, 22(3): 109-114. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2023109
Citation: Yang Fan. A Brief Discussion on the Agricultural and Forestry Artifacts of the Funeral Ritual System in the Three Rites[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2023, 22(3): 109-114. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2023109

A Brief Discussion on the Agricultural and Forestry Artifacts of the Funeral Ritual System in the Three Rites

More Information
  • Received Date: March 09, 2023
  • Accepted Date: September 05, 2023
  • Available Online: September 06, 2023
  • Published Date: September 24, 2023
  • The ritual system is closely related to material, and the funeral part of three Confucian classics, i.e., Yili , Zhouli and Liji, regulates that a large number of raw plant materials should be used in funeral utensils and clothing. This paper sorts out the relevant chapters of Yili and Liji , putting forward that the making of funeral utensils should choose common floristic materials according to local conditions, and follow two principles of "using the nature of plants" and "expressing aspirations through natural objects", so as to carry forward the natural and humanistic attributes of plants and meet the needs of ethical life. Among them, "using the nature of plants" directly considers the physical properties of floristic materials in making ritual vessels, which reflects the pursuit of harmony and unity between man and nature."Expressing aspirations through natural objects" introduces the attributes of plants into the human world, expressing emotions and bidding farewell to relatives through the cultural implications of plants, which is the concrete and subtle presentation of the thinking mode of "analogy" in traditional Chinese philosophy.
  • [1]
    皮锡瑞. 孝经郑氏疏[M]. 北京:中华书局,2016.
    [2]
    贾公彦. 仪礼注疏[M]. 上海:上海古籍出版社,2008.
    [3]
    费孝通. 乡土中国[M]. 武汉:长江文艺出版社,2019.
    [4]
    孔颖达. 礼记正义[M]. 杭州:浙江大学出版社,2019.
    [5]
    沈从文. 中国服饰史[M]. 西安:陕西师范大学出版社,2004.
    [6]
    邵晋涵. 尔雅正义[M]. 北京:中华书局,2017.
    [7]
    皇侃. 论语义疏[M]. 北京:中华书局,2013.
    [8]
    孙诒让. 墨子间诂[M]. 北京:中华书局,2001.
    [9]
    郑燮. 郑板桥全集[M]. 南京:凤凰出版社,2012.
    [10]
    王树芝,赵志军,冯广平. 梓树、楸树的考古发现及其文化刍议[J]. 农业考古,2015(1):218-223.
    [11]
    张秀娟. 梓树中抗菌化合物的分离纯化及其抗菌性的研究[D]. 济南:山东师范大学,2009.
    [12]
    范晔. 后汉书[M]. 北京:中华书局,1965.
    [13]
    大葆台西汉木椁墓发掘简报[J]. 文物,1977(6):23-29,84-85.
    [14]
    班固. 汉书[M]. 北京:中华书局,1962.
    [15]
    曾洪学,屈兴红. 中国古代礼仪植物探析[J]. 生物学通报,2022,57(3):1-5.
    [16]
    靳宝. 汉代墓葬用柏及其原因分析[J]. 中原文物,2009(3):44-47,58. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1731.2009.03.007
    [17]
    陈立. 公羊义疏[M]. 北京:中华书局,2017.
    [18]
    王弼. 周易注[M]. 北京:中华书局,2011.
    [19]
    晁福林. 先秦民俗中的几个问题[J]. 民俗研究,2000(2):25-35. doi: 10.13370/j.cnki.fs.2000.02.004
    [20]
    晁福林. 中国民俗史·先秦卷[M]. 北京:北京出版社,2008.
    [21]
    李莉. 中国松柏文化初论[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2004,3(1):16-21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6116.2004.01.006
    [22]
    贾公彦. 周礼注疏[M]. 上海:上海古籍出版社,2010.
    [23]
    丁杰. 论中国古代墓植松柏习俗及其丧葬文化内涵[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2022,21(2):39-46.
    [24]
    韩茂莉. 宋代桑麻业地理分布初探[J]. 中国农史,1992(2):40-46.
    [25]
    朱熹. 诗集传[M]. 北京:中华书局,2017.
    [26]
    冯友兰. 中国哲学史[M]. 郑州:河南人民出版社,1988.
    [27]
    于广元. 先秦文学中双关溯源[J]. 中国典籍与文化,1998 (2):27-30. doi: 10.16093/j.cnki.ccc.1998.02.005
    [28]
    曹建墩. 中国古礼的象类原则与象征思维[J]. 社会科学,2019 (5):163-171. doi: 10.13644/j.cnki.cn31-1112.2019.05.016
    [29]
    张晓光. 中国逻辑传统中的类和推类[J]. 广东社会科学,2002(3):32-37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-114X.2002.03.007
    [30]
    田丰. 中国古代推类思维的基础、限度与严格性[J]. 哲学研究,2023(1):54-64,126.
    [31]
    朱炜. 《周易》“象”“类”关系及其在汉代的影响[J]. 周易研究,2022 (1):39-46.
  • Related Articles

    [1]Ding Jie. On the Custom about Planting Pines and Cypresses in Cemeteries in Ancient China and Its Cultural Connotation of Funeral[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2022, 21(2): 39-46. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2021066
    [2]LIU Rong-kun. Forest Culture and Ecological View in the Funeral of Yi Nationality[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2017, 16(3): 9-13. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2017023
    [3]YAN Jing-juan. Meaning-attribution and Strained Interpretation: Formation of Plant's Cultural Meaning[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2013, 12(3): 19-23.
    [4]LI Wei-hong, YAN Geng, LI Fei. Review and Suggestions of the National Compulsory Tree-planting Movement[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2013, 12(3): 12-18.
    [5]LIN Yan. Grass Culture in Chinese Traditional Culture[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2012, 11(2): 13-23.
    [6]QIU Li, WANG Dan-dan. Characteristics of Plant Landscape of Buddhism Monastery Garden in China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2010, 9(1): 76-81.
    [7]WANG Xi-qun, WANG An-qi. Textual Research on Two Tree Planting Steles in Peking University[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2010, 9(1): 34-35.
    [8]SHI Yan-jun, DONG Yuan. Analysis of Tree Planting Technology and Related Documents in Qing Dynasty[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2006, 5(4): 35-38.
    [9]CHEN Xi-ping. On the Connotation and Origin of Tree Culture[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2006, 5(3): 17-22.
    [10]JIA Nai_qian. On the Decree of Planting Trees of ZHU Yuan_zhang, the First Emperor of Ming Dynasty[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2006, 5(1): 29-34.

Catalog

    Article views (155) PDF downloads (18) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return