Advanced search
Yu Ruoxi, Suo Di, Li Yuanhui. From Local to Central: Legal Responsibilities in the Legislation for the Protection of Ancient and Famous Trees in China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2025, 24(1): 98-104. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2023213
Citation: Yu Ruoxi, Suo Di, Li Yuanhui. From Local to Central: Legal Responsibilities in the Legislation for the Protection of Ancient and Famous Trees in China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2025, 24(1): 98-104. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2023213

From Local to Central: Legal Responsibilities in the Legislation for the Protection of Ancient and Famous Trees in China

More Information
  • Received Date: March 19, 2024
  • Accepted Date: November 26, 2024
  • Available Online: November 26, 2024
  • A comprehensive and systematic examination of the legal responsibility in the legislation for the protection of ancient and famous trees in China is conducted. Through combing the list of legal responsibilities of the administrative counterparts involved in the protection of ancient and famous trees in the 55 provincial local legislation in China, it is found that they present a variety of types of offence, and the way of assuming the responsibility is mainly by imposing fines. There are other problems such as legislative gaps in the setting of legal responsibilities for the protection of ancient and famous trees in legislation, contradiction of the higher law, large differences in the amount of fines, and different bases for penalties inside and outside the urban planning area. In this regard, it is proposed that regulations on the protection of ancient and famous trees should be issued as soon as possible at the national level to fill the legislative gaps, to unify the basis for penalties inside and outside the urban planning area, to set up offences scientifically, to set up reasonable fines, etc., so as to provide references for the legislation on the protection of ancient and famous trees at the national level.

  • [1]
    胡坚强,夏有根,梅艳,等. 古树名木研究概述[J]. 福建林业科技,2004(3):151-154.
    [2]
    张晓松,朱基钗.习近平总书记考察广西,还有这些细节[EB/OL].(2021-04-29) [2023-09-15]. http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2021-04/29/c_1127392860.htm.
    [3]
    公安部等三部门联合部署开展打击破坏古树名木违法犯罪活动专项整治行动 [EB/OL].(2022-09-16) [2023-09-15]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2022-09/16/content_5710200.htm.
    [4]
    王枫,秦仲,陈幸良. 古树名木保护地方立法评析与建议[J]. 资源开发与市场,2021,37(1):51-55.
    [5]
    张凯. 古树名木保护管理存在的问题及对策分析:以张掖市甘州区为例[J]. 绿色科技,2017(23):114-115,118.
    [6]
    徐向华,郭清梅. 行政处罚中罚款数额的设定方式:以上海市地方性法规为例[J]. 法学研究,2006(6):89-101.
    [7]
    胡建淼,胡晓军. 行政责令行为法律规范分析及立法规范[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2013,43(1):101-111.
    [8]
    第二次全国古树名木资源普查结果公布 全国古树名木共计508.19万株[EB/OL]. (2022-09-10)[2023-09-15]. https://www.forestry.gov.cn/main/65/20220920/142123845830300.html.
    [9]
    最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于适用《中华人民共和国刑法》第三百四十四条有关问题的批复[J]. 中华人民共和国最高人民检察院公报,2020(2):13-14.
    [10]
    杨娱. 北京市古树名木保护与管理中的公众参与问题研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学,2019.
    [11]
    胡建淼. 法律规范之间抵触标准研究[J]. 中国法学,2016(3):5-24.
    [12]
    詹运洲,周凌. 生态文明背景下城市古树名木保护规划方法及实施机制的思考:以上海的实践为例[J]. 城市规划学刊,2016(1):106-115.
    [13]
    廖刚,赵宝德,梁东霞. 古树名木专项保护公益诉讼检察实践探索[J]. 中国检察官,2023(8):58-60.
    [14]
    刘鹏. 我国古树名木保护法律制度研究[D]. 长沙:湖南师范大学,2011.
    [15]
    林广思,杨锐. 我国城乡园林绿化法规分析[J]. 中国园林,2010,26(12):29-32.
    [16]
    周海华,王双龙. 我国古树名木资源法律保护探析[J]. 生态经济,2007(3):153-155. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4407.2007.03.037

Catalog

    Article views (132) PDF downloads (15) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return