| Citation: |
Shi Zhenghuang, Wu Chengliang, Zhang Haokun, Tian Minghua, Hou Fangmiao. A Review of Research on "Certain Chief System" and Natural Resources Management from the Perspective of Ecological Civilization[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2025, 24(1): 25-32. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2023249
|
The "certain chief system" is a significant institutional innovation in China's natural ecological environment sector, playing an important role in achieving the sustainable development of natural resources. This paper, from the perspective of ecological civilization, examines the origins and diffusion mechanisms of the "certain chief system" and reviews its connotations and supporting theories. It systematically analyzes the relevant literature on the governance performance of the "certain chief system" since its implementation, attempting to reveal the theoretical mechanisms and empirical outcomes of its impact on natural resources governance. The findings show that most existing studies suggest that the "certain chief system" can incentivize government actions and integrate governance resources, thereby serving as a concrete operation of China's approach to "mobilizing resources to accomplish significant tasks", which helps improve natural resources governance performance. However, since the "certain chief system" fundamentally involves constraining governance responsibility entities, its governance effects vary across regions. Excessive horizontal policy innovations could distract government attention and increase regulatory costs, making it difficult for the system to become a long-term, one-size-fits-all solution for natural resources governance in China. In the future, research on the "certain chief system" needs to focus on longer policy cycles and explore governance approaches and pathways under the coexistence of various "certain chief system" policies, based on policy effects and grassroots governance realities. The government should also reduce the burden on grassroots levels and avoid unrestricted horizontal policy innovations under the "certain chief system".
| [1] |
谷树忠,吴太平. 中国新时代自然资源治理体系的理论构想[J]. 自然资源学报,2020,35(8):1802-1816.
|
| [2] |
陈涛. 不变体制变机制:河长制的起源及其发轫机制研究[J]. 河北学刊,2021,41(6):169-177.
|
| [3] |
林震,孟芮萱. 以林长制促“林长治”:林长制的制度逻辑与治理逻辑[J]. 福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2021(6):57-69.
|
| [4] |
曹新富,周建国. 我国基层政府河长制执行偏差:主要表现形式、成因及其矫正路径[J]. 当代经济管理,2022,44(3):33-40.
|
| [5] |
黄溶冰,谢晓君. 领导干部自然资源资产离任审计能提升政府环境治理执行力吗?[J]. 审计与经济研究,2022,37(4):9-20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4833.2022.04.002
|
| [6] |
黄智宇. 生态文明语境下我国自然资源多元治理体系之优化[J]. 江西社会科学,2017,37(10):218-226.
|
| [7] |
余敏江. 论生态治理中的中央与地方政府间利益协调[J]. 社会科学,2011(9):23-32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0257-5833.2011.09.003
|
| [8] |
许在华. 我国林长制制度体系实施探赜[J]. 世界林业研究,2022,35(2):117-122.
|
| [9] |
侯方淼,林煜国,周珊,等. 中国林长制改革的底层逻辑与发展历程及深化策略[J]. 世界林业研究,2023,36(4):1-8.
|
| [10] |
王亚华,王睿,康静宁. 公共事物治理制度设计原则的检验与反思[J]. 北大政治学评论,2022(1):3-25.
|
| [11] |
陈书全,冯曾珍. 论发达国家政府环境管理及其对我国的启示[J]. 中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版),2009(5):36-40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-335X.2009.05.008
|
| [12] |
韩志明,李春生. 治理界面的集中化及其建构逻辑:以河长制、街长制和路长制为中心的分析[J]. 理论探索,2021(2):61-67. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4175.2021.02.008
|
| [13] |
陈雅如. 林长制改革存在的问题与建议[J]. 林业经济,2019,41(2):26-30.
|
| [14] |
岳文泽,夏皓轩,钟鹏宇,等. 自然资源治理助力共同富裕:政策演进、关键挑战与应对策略[J]. 中国土地科学,2022,36(9):1-9.
|
| [15] |
ZHENG S,KAHN M E,SUN W,et al. Incentives for China's urban mayors to mitigate pollution externalities:the role of the central government and public environmentalism[J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics,2014,47:61-71. doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2013.09.003
|
| [16] |
KAHN M E,LI P,ZHAO D. Water pollution progress at borders:the role of changes in China's political promotion incentives[J]. American Economic Journal:Economic Policy,2015,7(4):223-242. doi: 10.1257/pol.20130367
|
| [17] |
王凯. 网络治理视域下森林资源治理模式探析[J]. 世界林业研究,2019,32(3):13-17.
|
| [18] |
ZHANG B,CHEN X L,GUO H X. Does central supervision enhance local environmental enforcement? quasi-experimental evidence from China[J]. Journal of Public Economics,2018,164:70-90.
|
| [19] |
徐娟,马佳骏,邵帅,等. “河长制”能实现地方政府跨域间的协同治理吗:基于“碎片化治理”的视角[J]. 南方经济,2022(4):50-74.
|
| [20] |
曾凡银. 以林长制构建林业生态发展长效机制[J]. 江淮论坛,2019(6):62-67. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-862X.2019.06.009
|
| [21] |
熊烨. 跨域环境治理:一个“纵向—横向”机制的分析框架——以“河长制”为分析样本[J]北京社会科学,2017(5):108-116.
|
| [22] |
任敏. “河长制”:一个中国政府流域治理跨部门协同的样本研究[J]. 北京行政学院学报,2015(3):25-31. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7621.2015.03.004
|
| [23] |
尹长萍,蒋水全,孙芳城. 生态文明战略下林长制政策跟踪审计模式探析[J]. 财会月刊,2022(24):92-98.
|
| [24] |
王书明,蔡萌萌. 基于新制度经济学视角的“河长制”评析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2011,21(9):8-13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2011.09.002
|
| [25] |
孙芳城,丁瑞. 河长制与产业结构升级:“坐以待毙”还是“涅槃重生”?[J]. 济南大学学报(社会科学版),2022,32(4):85-99. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3842.2022.04.014
|
| [26] |
李强,刘庆发. 环境分权与长江经济带经济增长质量:影响机理与实证检验[J]. 南开经济研究,2022(4):120-138.
|
| [27] |
王勇. 水环境治理“河长制”的悖论及其化解[J]. 西部法学评论,2015(3):1-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3687.2015.03.001
|
| [28] |
REN M. The river-chief mechanism:a case study of China's inter-departmental coordination for watershed treatment[J]. Journal of Beijing Administrative College,2015,3:25-31.
|
| [29] |
HOLMSTRO B,MILGROM P. Multitask principal-agent analyses:incentive contracts,asset ownership,and job design[J]. The Journal of Law,Economics,and Organization,1991,7:24-52.
|
| [30] |
CHEN Z,KAHN M E,LIU Y,et al. The consequences of spatially differentiated water pollution regulation in China[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2018,88:468-485. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2018.01.010
|
| [31] |
YU H,SONG L,CHEN H. Design and implementation of river protection management system based on river chief mechanism[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 2016, 34 :608-614.
|
| [32] |
LI J,SHI X,WU H Q,et al. Trade-off between economic development and environmental governance in China:an analysis based on the effect of river chief system[J]. China Economic Review,2020,60:101403. doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2019.101403
|
| [33] |
林伟星,陈佳,洪燕真,等. 制度如何影响公共政策过程:基于中国林长制政策的分析[J]. 世界林业研究,2023,36(5):1-7.
|
| [34] |
林煜国,吴成亮,侯方淼. 林长制改革的理论解释、历史回顾与制度效应[J]. 农业经济问题,2023(8):17-30.
|
| [35] |
秦柳,姚文玲. 林长制的治理逻辑与优化路径[J]. 东岳论丛,2022,43(9):81-88. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8353.2022.9.dylc202209009
|
| [36] |
周玉意,阙磊. 落实田长制耕地“严厉治”[N]. 湖南法治报,2023-11-18(12).
|
| [37] |
严米金,祝学庆. 田长制田长治[N]. 江西日报,2022-05-16(5).
|
| [38] |
宋维志. 运动式治理的常规化:方式、困境与出路——以河长制为例[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版),2021,36(4):136-148. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7672.2021.04.013
|
| [39] |
李灵芝,羊洋,周力. 河长的边界:对流域污染治理行政力量的反思[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2022,32(6):147-154. doi: 10.12062/cpre.20220414
|
| [40] |
沈坤荣,金刚. 中国地方政府环境治理的政策效应:基于“河长制”演进的研究[J]. 中国社会科学,2018(5):92-115.
|
| [41] |
刘亦文,吴荆,蔡宏宇. 湘江流域“河长制”的生态环境治理效应研究[J]. 软科学,2022,36(3):75-82.
|
| [42] |
于红,杨林,郑潇. 河长制能实现“以邻为壑”到“守望相助”的协同治理吗?——来自七大流域准自然实验的检验[J]. 软科学,2022,36(6):40-47.
|
| [43] |
SHE Y,LIU Y B,JIANG L,et al. Is China's river chief policy effective? evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in the Yangtze River economic belt,China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2019,220:919-930. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.031
|
| [44] |
马军旗,乐章,夏屹. 湖长制对水环境治理效果的影响研究:以武汉市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2021,31(5):1125-1136.
|
| [45] |
肖建忠,赵豪. 河湖长制能否起到保护水资源的作用?——基于湖北省经验数据[J]. 华中师范大学学报(自然科学版),2020,54(4):596-603.
|
| [46] |
马鹏超,胡乃元,朱玉春. 河长制对村域河流治理绩效的影响及作用机制[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2022,22(3):121-129.
|
| [47] |
JIE O Y,ZHANG K ,WEN B,et al. Top-down and bottom-up approaches to environmental governance in China:evidence from the River Chief System (RCS)[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2020,17(19):1-23.
|
| [48] |
SIGMAN H. Transboundary spillovers and decentralization of environmental policies[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2005,50(1):82-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2004.10.001
|
| [49] |
HELLAND E,WHITFORD A B. Pollution incidence and political jurisdiction:evidence from the TRI[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and management,2003,46(3):403-424. doi: 10.1016/S0095-0696(03)00033-0
|
| [50] |
LEVINSON A. Environmental regulatory competition:a status report and some new evidence[J]. National Tax Journal,2003,56(1):91-106.
|
| [51] |
LIST J A,BULTE E H,SHOGREN J F. "Beggar thy neighbor":testing for free riding in state-level endangered species expenditures[J]. Public Choice,2002,111(3):303-315.
|
| [52] |
LIPSCOMB M,Mobarak A M. Decentralization and pollution spillovers:evidence from the re-drawing of county borders in Brazil[J]. The Review of Economic Studies,2016,84(1):464-502.
|
| [53] |
GORDON R H. An optimal taxation approach to fiscal federalism[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1983,98(4):567-586. doi: 10.2307/1881778
|
| [54] |
BERNAUER T,KUHN P M. Is there an environmental version of the Kantian peace? insights from water pollution in Europe[J]. European Journal of International Relations,2010,16(1):77-102. doi: 10.1177/1354066109344662
|
| [55] |
OGAWA H,WIDASIN D E. Think locally,act locally:spillovers,spillbacks,and efficient decentralized policymaking[J]. American Economic Review,2009,99(4):1206-1217. doi: 10.1257/aer.99.4.1206
|
| [56] |
张霁,黄航行,俞雅蓉,等. 基于熵权法的武威市河长制考核评价研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报,2021,40(S2):6-10.
|
| [57] |
雷雲翔,丁郭明,沈新平,等. 河长制对塔里木河流域水环境治理成效评价[J]. 灌溉排水学报,2022,41(S1):111-114.
|
| [58] |
陈卓,唐德善. 湾长制下江苏省海湾治理成效评价研究[J]. 水电能源科学,2022,40(4):182-186.
|
| [59] |
唐小平,罗敏,黄国胜,等. 林长制的安庆实践与创新[J]. 林业资源管理,2021(1):1-10.
|
| [60] |
许莹莹,唐培钧. “河长制”政策效应及地区异质性研究[J]. 生态经济,2020,36(12):181-186.
|
| [61] |
ZHOU L,LI L Z,HUANG J K. The river chief system and agricultural non-point source water pollution control in China[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture,2021,20(5):1382-1395. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63370-6
|
| [62] |
王力,孙中义. 河长制的环境与经济双重红利效应研究:基于长江经济带河长制政策实施的准自然实验[J]. 软科学,2020,34(11):40-45.
|
| [63] |
柏杨. “河长制”在长三角地区的实施效果研究:基于DID模型的实证分析[J]. 应用数学进展,2022,11(4):2343-2351.
|
| [64] |
陈泳. “像保护大熊猫一样保护耕地” 卫星空中看“田长”地上巡[N]. 成都日报,2022-07-21(2).
|
| [65] |
黄敏. 建设人与自然和谐共生的现代化:中国式现代化的创新抉择[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2022,21(4):9-16.
|
| [1] | Zhang Lei, Wang Chengfeng, Xing Rui. Attributes, Functions and Paths of Ecological Civilization Education of National Parks[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2023, 22(4): 61-65. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2023195 |
| [2] | ZHANG Wei-zhe, PENG Zuo-deng, ZHAI Ming-pu, YIN Wei-lun. The Establishment of China’s Agricultural and Rural Ecological Civilization Standard System[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2020, 19(3): 55-66. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2020051 |
| [3] | WU Tong. Local Knowledge and Building of Ecological Civilization[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2020, 19(2): 1-5. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2020032 |
| [4] | WANG Xi-qun. Philosophical Thinking about Ecological Civilization in China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2016, 15(1): 1-17. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2015022 |
| [5] | HE Hua-zheng, FENG Jing-lun. Several Mistakes in Construction of Ecological Civilization[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2013, 12(1): 13-17. |
| [6] | SU Zu-rong. Ecological Turning of Contemporary Philosophy under Viewpoint of Ecological Civilization[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2012, 11(2): 1-5. |
| [7] | ZHU Yong-jie. Ecological Civilization and Productive Force[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2012, 11(1): 54-57. |
| [8] | ChinaYAO Bei. Ecological Civilization and Value Orientation of Law Construction in China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2011, 10(4): 82-85. |
| [9] | LIU Dong-ying, YUAN Dan-dan. Uygur Traditional Ecological Ethics and Establishment of Ecological Civilization in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2009, 8(1): 48-53. |
| [10] | KE Shui-fa, , ZHAO Tie-bai. Developing a Harmonic Relationship between Human and Nature for a Society with Ecological Civilization[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2009, 8(1): 39-43. |
Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd. 
DownLoad: