| Citation: |
Ding Luyang, Li Huajing. Business Model Innovation Empowering the Development of New Quality Productivity of Agricultural Enterprises: Theoretical Mechanism and Empirical Test[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2025, 24(2): 50-61. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2024072
|
Developing new quality productivity is of great significance for promoting the high-quality development of agricultural enterprises. Based on Marx's theory of the three elements of productivity and the concept of new quality productivity, this paper constructs an index system for measuring new quality productivity in agricultural enterprises. The entropy method is then employed to quantify this productivity. Using panel data from 110 listed agricultural enterprises, this study examines the impact of business model innovation on new quality productivity in agricultural enterprises. Drawing on dynamic capability theory and institutional theory, this paper investigates the mediating role of dynamic capability and the moderating role of the institutional environment. The research results show that: new quality productivity in agricultural enterprises is generally low, and there are significant differences among agricultural enterprises. Business model innovation significantly enhances new quality productivity in agricultural enterprises. Dynamic capability mediates the relationship between business model innovation and new quality productivity in agricultural enterprises. The institutional environment positively moderates the effect of business model innovation on new quality productivity in agricultural enterprises. The impact of business model innovation on new quality productivity in agricultural enterprises varies significantly based on property rights and industry segments. The research results deepen the understanding of the relationship between business model innovation and new quality productivity in agricultural enterprises. They also provide theoretical guidance for agricultural enterprises to actively implement business model innovation and achieve high-quality development.
| [1] |
习近平主持召开新时代推动东北全面振兴座谈会强调 牢牢把握东北的重要使命 奋力谱写东北全面振兴新篇章[N]. 人民日报,2023-09-10(1).
|
| [2] |
林万龙,董心意. 新质生产力引领农业强国建设的若干思考[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2024,24(3):18-27.
|
| [3] |
AMIT R,ZOTT C. Value creation in e-business[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2001,22(6/7):493-520.
|
| [4] |
ZOTT C,AMIT R. Business model design:an activity system perspective[J]. Long Range Planning,2010,43(2-3):216-226. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.004
|
| [5] |
喻登科,严红玲. 技术创新与商业模式创新二元耦合组织成长路径:华为30年发展历程研究[J]. 科技进步与对策,2019,36(23):85-94. doi: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2018100344
|
| [6] |
杨蕙馨,张金艳. 颠覆性技术应用何以创造价值优势?——基于商业模式创新视角[J]. 经济管理,2019,41(3):21-37.
|
| [7] |
廖方伟,张丽楠,张叶. 健身俱乐部商业模式创新对竞争优势的影响:环境动态性的中介作用[J]. 中国体育科技,2022,58(6):88-93.
|
| [8] |
杨雪,刘成,何玉成. 动态能力视角下商业模式创新对企业绩效的作用机制研究:以制造业上市公司为例[J]. 工业技术经济,2019,38(2):120-128. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-910X.2019.02.015
|
| [9] |
李鸿磊. 商业模式创新、二元创新导向与企业绩效影响[J]. 现代经济探讨,2019,26(12):92-99. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-2382.2019.12.014
|
| [10] |
陈寒松,牟筱笛,贾竣云. 创业企业何以提高创新绩效:基于创业学习与商业模式创新协同联动视角的QCA方法[J]. 科技进步与对策,2020,37(6):19-26. doi: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2019090847
|
| [11] |
黄昊,王国红,邢蕊,等. 创业导向与商业模式创新的匹配对能力追赶绩效的影响:基于增材制造企业的多案例研究[J]. 中国软科学,2019,34(5):116-130. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2019.05.012
|
| [12] |
TEECE D J ,PISAN G ,SHUEN A . Dynamic capabilities and strategic management[J] . Strategic Management Journal,1997,18 (7):509.
|
| [13] |
WANG J J,LI J J,CHANG J. Product co-development in an emerging market:the role of buyer-supplier compatibility and institutional environment[J]. Journal of Operations Management,2016,46:69-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2016.07.002
|
| [14] |
史言信,熊天任. 数字化、制度环境与制造业高质量发展[J]. 当代财经,2022,43(11):113-124.
|
| [15] |
宋敬,张卓,叶涛. 高管团队异质性与数字商业模式创新:基于A股上市公司的经验分析[J]. 技术经济,2022,41(5):39-51. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-980X.2022.05.004
|
| [16] |
匡远配,彭云. 农地确权真的能推动农业适度规模经营吗?——基于制度效力的视角[J]. 科学决策,2021,27(8):24-37.
|
| [17] |
石建勋,徐玲. 加快形成新质生产力的重大战略意义及实现路径研究[J]. 财经问题研究,2024,46(1):3-12.
|
| [18] |
王琴梅,杨军鸽. 数字新质生产力与我国农业的高质量发展研究[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2023,52(6):61-72.
|
| [19] |
马晓河,杨祥雪. 以加快形成新质生产力推动农业高质量发展[J]. 农业经济问题,2024,45(4):4-12.
|
| [20] |
CHEN W Q,HAUSCHILD M Z,HUANG B J,et al. Life cycle engineering and sustainable manufacturing for net-zero targets and environmental[J]. Resources Conservation and Recycling,2022,186:106480. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106480
|
| [21] |
WEI Z,SUN L. How to leverage manufacturing digitalization for green process innovation:an information processing perspective[J]. Industrial Management& Data Systems,2021,121(5):1026-1044.
|
| [22] |
QIU L,HU D,WANG Y. How do firms achieve sustainability through green innovation under external pressures of environmental regulation and market turbulence?[J]. Business Strategy Entertainment,2020,29(6):2695-2714.
|
| [23] |
BATLLES-DELAFUENTE A,BELMONTE-URENA L J,PLAZA-UBEDA J A. Sustainable business model in the product-service system:analysis of global research and associated eu legislation[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2021,18(19):10123. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910123
|
| [24] |
HELFAT C E,RAUBITSCHEK R S. Dynamic and integrative capabilities for profiting from innovation in digital platform-based ecosystems[J]. Research Policy,2018,47(8):1391-1399. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.019
|
| [25] |
李梅,朱韵,赵乔,等. 研发国际化、动态能力与企业创新绩效[J]. 中国软科学,2022,37(6):169-180.
|
| [26] |
陈彪,单标安. 转型环境下创业战略与新创企业竞争优势关系研究[J]. 科技进步与对策,2018,35(3):8-14.
|
| [27] |
蒋煦涵,章丽萍. 数字化转型促进高端制造业绿色发展的路径研究[J]. 当代财经,2023,43(9):16-27.
|
| [28] |
郭丕斌,张爱琴. 负责任创新、动态能力与企业绿色转型升级[J]. 科研管理,2021,42(7):31-39.
|
| [29] |
马骁,周克清. 国家治理、政府角色与现代财政制度建设[J]. 财政研究,2016,37(1):2-8.
|
| [30] |
保永文,马颖. 中国制造业技术创新与产业国际竞争力[J]. 云南财经大学学报,2018,34(8):14-28.
|
| [31] |
罗必良,耿鹏鹏. 农业新质生产力:理论脉络、基本内核与提升路径[J]. 农业经济问题,2024,45(4):13-26.
|
| [32] |
姜长云. 农业新质生产力:内涵特征、发展重点、面临制约和政策建议[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2024,24(3):1-17.
|
| [33] |
王珏,王荣基. 新质生产力:指标构建与时空演进[J]. 西安财经大学学报,2024,37(1):31-47.
|
| [34] |
陈琪. 企业环保投资与经济绩效:基于企业异质性视角[J]. 华东经济管理,2019,33(7):158-168.
|
| [35] |
苏冬蔚,刘子茗. 绿色金融改革是否影响企业绿色绩效与漂绿风险?[J]. 国际金融研究,2023,38(4):74-85.
|
| [36] |
马茜,任晓松,张红兵,等. 碳交易政策、研发创新与污染性企业碳绩效[J]. 科研管理,2023,44(7):114-123.
|
| [37] |
刘承毅,李欣. 环境规制对高碳制造业绿色低碳发展的影响:基于数字技术的调节效应[J]. 首都经济贸易大学学报,2023,25(3):18-31.
|
| [38] |
陈小辉,张红伟,陈文. 企业数字化如何影响企业杠杆率?[J]. 中国管理科学,2024,32(7):19-27.
|
| [39] |
段丁允,冯宗宪. “一带一路”沿线国家数字化发展水平对低碳绿色绩效的影响研究[J]. 经济问题探索,2023,44(5):158-176.
|
| [40] |
GUO B,PANG X Q,LI W. The role of top management team diversity in shaping the performance of business model innovation:a threshold effect[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,2018(2):241-253.
|
| [41] |
JAFFE A B. Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D:evidence from firms' patents,profits and market value[J]. The American Economic Association,1986(5):984-1001.
|
| [42] |
刘耀龙,黄晓丽,段锦. 技术多元化、动态能力对企业二元式创新的影响:基于中国汽车企业面板数据[J]. 企业经济,2017,36(7):125-133.
|
| [43] |
王文涛,彭卿. 数字经济、企业文化与企业创新能力[J]. 湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2023,47(5):48-55. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5981.2023.05.007
|
| [44] |
杜善重. 董事长与总经理的亲缘关系影响了中国家族企业的创新投入吗[J]. 管理学季刊,2019,14(4):86-111.
|
| [45] |
温忠麟,叶宝娟. 中介效应分析:方法和模型发展[J]. 心理科学进展,2014,22(5):731-745.
|
Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd. 
DownLoad: