The Methodology of Ecological Civilization Research： Zoom and Field

Liu Huajie

doi:10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2024133

Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science) > 2024 > 23(3): 17-23. > DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2024133

Liu Huajie. The Methodology of Ecological Civilization Research： Zoom and Field[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2024, 23(3): 17-23. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2024133

Citation:

PDF (541 KB)

The Methodology of Ecological Civilization Research： Zoom and Field

Liu Huajie

Department of Philosophy, Peking University, Beijing,100871, P.R.China

More Information

Received Date: June 09, 2024
Accepted Date: June 26, 2024

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

"Ecological civilization" has become an academic buzzword, which is both a good thing and an alarm. Humanists are engaged in the research of ecological civilization and biodiversity, usually from a single perspective, with clean hands and just talking. From the methodological point of view, for the former, we need to consider the "zoom method" through changing observational focal distance and investigate the problems at different scales. For the latter, humanists should go deep into the reality, soil themselves first, and conduct more research on "field philosophy". There are a series of noteworthy cases of ecological, environmental and biodiversity damage in China, which can be effectively analyzed by humanists. "Ex situ conservation" event is still worth tracking, because it is a prominent manifestation of the long-term habitual thinking in the scientific and horticultural circles.
- ecological civilization,
- zoom method,
- field philosophy,
- ex situ conservation

FullText(HTML)

References (42)

References

[1]	马克思恩格斯文集:第1卷[M].中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,编译. 北京:人民出版社,2009:11,502.
[2]	刘华杰. 当代科学的五个非本质品性[J]. 关东学刊,2024(1):27-45.
[3]	刘华杰. 社会研究与数理思维 [C]//孙小礼,编. 科学技术与世纪之交的中国. 北京:人民出版社,1997.
[4]	朱良志. 四时之外[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2023.
[5]	克拉瓦尔. 地理学思想史 [M]. 郑胜华,译. 4版. 北京:北京大学出版社,2015.
[6]	芒德布罗. 大自然的分形几何学[M]. 凌复华,陈守吉,译. 北京:科学出版社,2022.
[7]	李后强,张国祺,汪富泉,等. 分形理论的哲学发轫[M]. 成都:四川大学出版社,1993.
[8]	克莱普顿,埃尔顿. 空间、知识与权力[M]. 莫伟民,周轩宇,译. 北京:商务印书馆,2021.
[9]	雷尔夫. 地方与无地方[M]. 刘苏,相欣奕,译. 北京:商务印书馆,2021.
[10]	周敦颐,邵雍. 太极图说·通书·观物篇[M]. 上海:上海古籍出版社,1992.
[11]	孟强. 延展认知“三次浪潮”及其技术哲学启示[J]. 安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2023,51(5):23-28.
[12]	MEINE C ed. Aldo Leopold: a sand county almanac & other writing on ecology and conservation[M]. New York:Literary Classics of the United States (The Library of America),2013:114-117.
[13]	MITHEN S. Did farming arise from a misapplication of social intelligence?[J]. Philosophical Transactions:Biological Sciences,2007,362(1480):705-718. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2006.2005
[14]	MITHEN S. After the ice:a global human history 20,000-5000 BC[M]. London:Weidenfeld & Nicoson,2003.
[15]	MITHEN S. The prehistory of the mind[M]. London:Thames & Hudson,1999.
[16]	鲁特格尔·布雷格曼. 人类的善意[M]. 贾拥民,译. 北京:北京联合出版公司,2022.
[17]	WILSON E O. Consilience:the unity of knowledge[M]. New York:Alfred A. Knopf,1998.
[18]	WILSON E O. The social conquest of earth[M]. New York:Liveright,2012.
[19]	刘华杰. E. O. 威尔逊的“博物学家”头衔[J]. 生物多样性,2022,30(1):19-24.
[20]	田松. 博物学:人类拯救灵魂的一条小路[J]. 广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2011,33(6):50-52.
[21]	田松. 博物学与生态文明建设[M]//刘华杰,主编. 西方博物学文化. 北京:北京大学出版社,2019:523-542.
[22]	田松. 有限地球时代的怀疑论[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2007.
[23]	田松. 警惕科学[M]. 上海:上海科学技术文献出版社,2014.
[24]	田松,刘华杰. 重建本体论和自然观的问题[J]. 关东学刊,2021(2):47-55.
[25]	田松. 长链条因果、短链条正义与长时段视野[N]. 晶报. 2022-08-02(A02).
[26]	李侠. 断裂与整合:有关科学主义的多维度考察与研究[M]. 太原:山西科学技术出版社,2006.
[27]	米歇尔·塞尔,布鲁诺·拉图尔. 我不想保持正确[M]. 顾晓燕,译. 上海:上海人民出版社,2024.
[28]	刘华杰. 生物多样性保护需科学与人文配合行动[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2022,21,20(2):15-21.
[29]	刘华杰,田松. 高度专业化之于哲学:升华还是死路?[J]. 关东学刊,2019(3):54-59.
[30]	FRODEMAN R,BRIGGLE A. Socrates tenured:the institutions of 21st-century philosophy[M]. Lanham:Rowman & Littlefield,2016.
[31]	WYLIE A. Philosophy of the field,in the field[J]. Philosophy of Science,2023,90(5):1480-1495. doi: 10.1017/psa.2023.90
[32]	BRISTER E,FRODEMAN R. A guide to field philosophy:case studies and practical strategies[C]. New York:Routledge,2020.
[33]	PLAISANCE K S,ELLIOTT K C. A framework for analyzing broadly engaged philosophy of science[J]. Philosophy of Science,2021,88(4):594-615. doi: 10.1086/713891
[34]	霍尔姆斯·罗尔斯顿. 哲学走向荒野[M]. 刘耳,叶平,译. 长春:吉林人民出版社,2000.
[35]	刘华杰. 看花就是做哲学[N]. 中华读书报,2023-05-17(16).
[36]	苏贤贵,田松,刘兵,等. 敬畏自然[M]. 保定:河北大学出版社,2005.
[37]	BRIGGLE A. Ethics and science:an introduction[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2012.
[38]	BRIGGLE A. A field guide to climate change:understanding the problems[M]. Toronto:Broadview Press,2024.
[39]	刘华杰. 质疑关于野生本土植物85%的迁地保护目标[J]. 生物多样性,2024(32):24009.
[40]	周桔,杨明,文香英,等. 加强植物迁地保护,促进植物资源保护和利用[J]. 中国科学院院刊,2021(36):417-424.
[41]	任海,文香英,廖景平,等. 试论植物园功能变迁与中国国家植物园体系建设[J]. 生物多样性,2022(30):22113.
[42]	刘华杰. 哈姆莱特的辩护、“田松讽”及科斯定理[J]. 自然辩证法研究,2024,40(2):123-126.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(4)

1.	郝亮，林涛，何侃，随梦飞，章陆杨，丁国昌. 森林康养步道五感体验需求与潜在游客体验意愿分析. 台湾农业探索. 2020(01): 62-68 .
2.	田明华，刘智丹，王富炜，王铭子，柴梅. 森林认证标识认知影响因素的实证分析——基于北京市488名消费者的调查. 林业经济问题. 2016(01): 65-71 .
3.	田明华，蔡昕妤，王晓雪，孙伊娃，吴肖梦，杜学贤，管乐. 北京市民农园参与者行为及满意度调查分析. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版). 2014(01): 83-90 .
4.	田明华，蔡昕妤，严青珊，孙伊娃，吴肖梦，杜学贤，管乐. 北京市居民参与市民农园的支付意愿分析. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版). 2014(03): 73-78 .

Other cited types(8)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (84) PDF downloads (51) Cited by(12)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

The Methodology of Ecological Civilization Research： Zoom and Field

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(4)

Other cited types(8)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content