Advanced search
Chen Junxiang. An Exploration of Ecology from the Perspective of Hartmut Rosa's "Social Acceleration Critique" Theory[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2025, 24(2): 8-17. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2024291
Citation: Chen Junxiang. An Exploration of Ecology from the Perspective of Hartmut Rosa's "Social Acceleration Critique" Theory[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2025, 24(2): 8-17. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2024291

An Exploration of Ecology from the Perspective of Hartmut Rosa's "Social Acceleration Critique" Theory

More Information
  • Received Date: December 21, 2024
  • Available Online: June 05, 2025
  • Within the framework of his social acceleration critique theory, Hartmut Rosa delves into the profound impact of the three core elements—technology, social structure, and accelerated life pace—on the ecological environment, which together form the accelerationist ideology. He employs the three critical temporal dimensions—function, norm, and ethics—to uncover the serious consequences of social acceleration for the ecological environment. Rosa suggests that by rebuilding a "resonance" relationship with the world, people can reclaim a deep understanding and perception of nature, thereby respecting and dedicating themselves to protecting the ecological environment in their actions. He further advocates for the creation of "deceleration oases" to mitigate excessive exploitation and use of natural resources, promote ecological restoration and sustainable development, and ultimately achieve an eco-friendly lifestyle aimed at "a good life". While Rosa's theory may not entirely break free from the "utopian" framework characteristic in the Frankfurt School, his acceleration theory undoubtedly enriches the theoretical system of social critique and provides valuable ideological resources and theoretical insights for the exploration and construction of beautiful, eco-friendly societies.

  • [1]
    马克思恩格斯文集:第8卷 [M]. 中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,编译. 北京:人民出版社,2009:169.
    [2]
    复旦大学当代国外马克思主义研究中心. 国外马克思主义研究发展报告(2017)[M]. 天津:天津人民出版社,2018:23.
    [3]
    雷禹. 加速主义思潮的悖论、教训及其启示:基于历史唯物主义的批判性考察[J]. 世界哲学,2023(3):16-27.
    [4]
    NICK L. A quick-and-dirty introduction to accelerationism[EB/OL]. [2024-10-16]. https://obsoletecapitalism.blogspot.com/2017/05/nick-land-quick-and-dirty-introduction.html.
    [5]
    李夏洁. 从现代性诊断到时间批判:罗萨社会加速批判理论的源流与论见[J]. 天津大学学报(社会科学版),2024,26(6):553-560. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-4339.2024.06.009
    [6]
    罗萨. 新异化的诞生[M]. 郑作彧,译. 上海:人民出版社,2018:13,14-15,18,21,33,86,93,97,101,110,111,117,119,121,131,135,142,44.
    [7]
    罗萨. 加速:现代社会中时间结构的改变[M]. 董璐,译. 北京:北京大学出版社,2015:89,95.
    [8]
    马克思恩格斯全集:第47卷[M]. 中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,编译. 北京:人民出版社,2016:559-560.
    [9]
    国吉. 法兰克福学派异化理论研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学,2021:92.
    [10]
    王善善. 哈特穆特·罗萨社会加速批判理论探究[D]. 大连:大连理工大学,2022:42.
    [11]
    NICK S,ALEX W. Inventing the future:postcapitalism and a world without work [M]. London:Verso,2015:2.
    [12]
    罗萨. 不受掌控[M]. 郑作彧,马欣,译. 上海:人民出版社,2022:54,56,59,61-62.
    [13]
    王凤才. 蔑视与反抗:霍耐特承认理论与法兰克福学派批判理论的“政治伦理转向”[M]. 重庆:重庆出版社,2008:293.
    [14]
    张莉莉. 哈特穆特·罗萨社会加速批判理论研究[D]. 武汉:中南财经政法大学,2022:13.
    [15]
    RAHEL J. Alienation[M]. New York:Columbia University Press,2014:25.
    [16]
    ROSA H. Resonance:a sociology of our relations to the worlds [M]. Cambridge:Polity Press,2019:184.
    [17]
    曾誉铭. 加速、异化与共鸣:论罗萨的批判理论及其与法兰克福学派的关系[J]. 当代国外马克思主义评论,2023(2):402-438.

Catalog

    Article views (28) PDF downloads (4) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return