Advanced search
SHI De-qun, ZHANG Yu-jun. Application of Travel Cost Method in Recreation Value Evaluation[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2010, 9(3): 69-74.
Citation: SHI De-qun, ZHANG Yu-jun. Application of Travel Cost Method in Recreation Value Evaluation[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2010, 9(3): 69-74.

Application of Travel Cost Method in Recreation Value Evaluation

More Information
  • Published Date: September 29, 2010
  • Travel Cost Method (TCM), one of the most popular methods in evaluating recreation value, is widely applied in the evaluation of tourist destination, especially for tourism resources. As an important basis for decision-making, the evaluation results of TCM greatly improve the effectiveness of policies. According to the theories and basic models of TCM, this paper summarizes the application scope of TCM in China and abroad, discusses the progress, problems and improvement of TCM in China, and puts forward the prospect of TCM in recreation value evaluation in China.
  • Related Articles

    [1]YAN Juan-juan, HUANG Xiu-juan. On the Measurement of Travel Cost and the Evaluation of Recreation Value of a Forest Park Based on TCM: A Case Study on the Fuzhou National Forest Park[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2016, 15(4): 62-67. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2016072
    [2]LI Dong. Review on Evaluation of Ecosystem Services Value[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2011, 10(1): 59-64.
    [3]YANG Zhi-geng, ZHANG Ying. Value Evaluation of Jinggangshan Forest Recreation Resources Based on Contingent Value Method[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2010, 9(4): 53-58.
    [4]SHI De-qun, ZHANG Yu-jun, . Application of Travel Cost Method in Recreation Value Evaluation[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2010, 9(3): 75-80.
    [5]ZHOU Wei, ZHAO Xiao-dong, LI Xu, YANG Jin-yu. Evaluation Index System of Wetland Ecotourism Management: Taking Four International Plateau Wetlands in Yunnan Province for Examples[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2010, 9(3): 63-68.
    [6]WANG Fu-wei,  WANG Zi-li. Value Type and its Evaluation of Forest Resource Asset[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2009, 8(4): 83-86.
    [7]GAO Shuang-lin, WANG Guo-zhu. Index System and Evaluation Methods of the Establishment of Subjects[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2006, 5(4): 65-69.
    [8]WEI Min, LI Shu-shan. On the Evaluating and Pricing of Scenic Resources[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2005, 4(2): 32-36.
    [9]SU Zu-rong. The Stages and Evaluation of Forest Culture Development[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2005, 4(1): 1-7.
    [10]Sun Yueqin. Pondering over the Evaluation of Sci-tech Achievements in Agriculture and Forestry[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2004, 3(3): 55-59.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(3)

    1. 程秋旺,于赟,俞维防,陈钦. 不同生计策略类型对农户林种选择意愿的影响研究——基于福建省477户农户调查数据. 生态经济. 2021(03): 119-124+131 .
    2. 徐晓倩,刘光哲,方义龙,段俊平,苏步军,徐苏珍. 陕西省农户使用林业生物质能源产品意愿的影响因素分析. 西北林学院学报. 2017(05): 306-312 .
    3. 王珍琦,米锋. 基于结构方程的林木生物质能源企业与林农合作关系研究. 林业经济问题. 2015(04): 360-365 .

    Other cited types(7)

Catalog

    Article views (1337) PDF downloads (5) Cited by(10)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return