Advanced search
LI Jian. Reflection of Two Kinds of Non-anthropocentrism Trends in Environmental Aesthetics[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2013, 12(1): 18-22.
Citation: LI Jian. Reflection of Two Kinds of Non-anthropocentrism Trends in Environmental Aesthetics[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2013, 12(1): 18-22.
shu

Reflection of Two Kinds of Non-anthropocentrism Trends in Environmental Aesthetics

  • College of Materials Science and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, 100083, P. R. China

More Information
  • Published Date: March 29, 2013
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • Based on the concern of ecological deterioration, the nonanthropocentrism of environmental ethics criticizes the anthropocentrism in field of aesthetics. Among of the environmental appreciation models, both Allen Carlsons dualism theory and Arnold Berleants holism theory have an inclination towards nonanthropocentrism. The transformation of ethics value to aesthetic value is at the cost of sacrificing aesthetic. However, aesthetic subjectivity is not equal with anthropocentrism in an ethics sense. It is necessary and possible to acknowledge the essential and legit status of aesthetic subject and establish a free and healthy appreciation model of environmental aesthetics.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (0)
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]TONG Tong. Nature-based Solutions for Urban Climate Change Adaption: Barcelona’s Experience[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2021, 20(1): 69-75. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2020144
    [2]CHEN Xi, LIU Bin, ZHOU Jian. The Development of the REDD Mechanism in the International Climate Change Law and An Interpretation of the Article 5 in Paris Agreement[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2017, 16(1): 36-41. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2016061
    [3]GONG Ya-zhen, CHEN Zhan, GUAN Bao-zhu, HE Guan-ying, YANG Xiao-jing. Behaviors and Affecting Factors in Farmers'Adaptation to Climate Change in Poor Regions of China: Empirical Evidences from Lancang River Basin[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2016, 15(3): 42-49. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2016024
    [4]ZENG Cheng, SHEN Yue-qin. Construction of China's Macro Social Accounting Matrix Based on the Forestry Sector[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2014, 13(2): 70-74.
    [5]LV Wei-xia, LI Ru, TU Xin-quan. Effect of Government’s Climate Policy on International Trade[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2010, 9(4): 65-72.
    [6]XIE Chao-zhu, 　XIE Lin. A High Degree of Concern about Forest in Climate Change: the New Mission of China’s Forestry Development[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2009, 8(3): 34-36.
    [7]LI Ping-ri, TAN Hui-zhong. Ancient Trees: An Example of the Changes of Climate and Environment in Ancient Time[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2009, 8(3): 9-12.
    [8]WU　Wei-guang, LIU　Wei, JIN　Hai-yan, SHAO　Xiang-jun, JIANG Chun-qian. Sustainable Forestry Development in Lin’an City and Its Implication[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2007, 6(2): 72-76.
    [9]XU Yan, ZHANG Cai_hong. Research on Financing Channels for China’s Forestry Sustainable Development[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2006, 5(1): 59-63.
    [10]Luo Juchun. The Changes of World Outlook in the Development of Civilizations[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2004, 3(4): 6-9.

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(20)

    1. 白晓航，朱珣之. 小五台山植物资源多样性保护与可持续管理. 中国野生植物资源. 2025(01): 102-110 .
    2. 邹芸姿，邹再进. 森林康养产业发展的生态补偿机制研究综述. 中国资源综合利用. 2024(03): 101-105 .
    3. 吴保含，杨加猛，仇梦女原. 基于知识图谱的森林生态补偿文献计量分析. 资源开发与市场. 2023(03): 274-283 .
    4. 闫海，韩鸿声. 生态旅游高质量发展的问题、成因与应对. 河北旅游职业学院学报. 2022(03): 1-4 .
    5. 彭湘萍. 生态补偿资金绩效审计评价体系构建研究. 中国产经. 2020(09): 50-52 .
    6. 叶榅平，毕雅辉. 建立环境公益诉讼基金制度的法理思考. 浙江海洋大学学报(人文科学版). 2020(04): 18-25 .
    7. 王毅，汪海燕. 自然资源保护生态补偿法律机制研究. 鄱阳湖学刊. 2018(06): 48-54+126 .
    8. 冯洁. 促进福建林业经济创新模式发展的对策思考. 时代金融. 2018(35): 401-402 .
    9. 苑小斐. 京津冀区际大气生态补偿专项基金制度构建的探究. 环境与可持续发展. 2017(04): 162-164 .
    10. 吴萍. 我国耕地休养生态补偿机制的构建. 江西社会科学. 2016(04): 158-163 .
    11. 马存利. 流域水污染生态补偿基金的法律制度研究. 嘉兴学院学报. 2016(05): 139-144 .
    12. 毕金平，汪永福. 我国生态补偿税费体系之厘清. 华东经济管理. 2015(09): 90-96 .
    13. 王娜娜，武永峰，胡博，陈崇娟，刘宏斌，罗良国. 基于环境保护正外部性视角的我国生态补偿研究进展. 生态学杂志. 2015(11): 3253-3260 .
    14. 张飞飞，毕金平. 生态补偿基金法律制度研究——基于安徽省相关制度考察. 山东农业工程学院学报. 2015(03): 54-57 .
    15. 王干，白明旭. 中国矿区生态补偿资金来源机制和对策探讨. 中国人口·资源与环境. 2015(05): 75-82 .
    16. 欧阳恩钱，徐佳佳. 海涂围垦的生态补偿机制初探. 温州大学学报(社会科学版). 2014(03): 12-20 .
    17. 谢剑斌，何承耕，钟全林. 生态补偿空间选择与分配的重要性及研究动态. 亚热带资源与环境学报. 2013(03): 29-34 .
    18. 闫志利. 生态文明视域下河北省沿海地区湿地农业发展模式研究. 河北北方学院学报(社会科学版). 2013(02): 52-57+68 .
    19. 闫志利，林瑞敏. 河北沿海地区湿地农业发展规划及其实现路径研究. 河北农业科学. 2012(09): 87-90+105 .
    20. 杜静. 关于集体林权抵押权实现问题的几点思考. 皖西学院学报. 2012(03): 98-101 .

    Other cited types(42)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (876) PDF downloads (95) Cited by(62)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Related Articles

    Copyright © 2013 Editorial Department of Beijing Forestry University 京ICP备05066833号-1

    Address：North-Star Times Tower, No.8 Beichendong Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China. China Pos：100083

    Tel：010-62337919 Fax：021-64253812

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return