Advanced search
LIN De-rong, ZHI Ling. Achievement Consolidation of the Grain for Green Project: A Dynamic Game Model Based on Rural Families’ Opportunity Cost[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2010, 9(1): 101-105.
Citation: LIN De-rong, ZHI Ling. Achievement Consolidation of the Grain for Green Project: A Dynamic Game Model Based on Rural Families’ Opportunity Cost[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2010, 9(1): 101-105.

Achievement Consolidation of the Grain for Green Project: A Dynamic Game Model Based on Rural Families’ Opportunity Cost

More Information
  • Published Date: March 29, 2010
  • There are over 32 million rural families involved in the Grain for Green Project. The achievement consolidation of the project mainly depends on the attitudes of government and rural families. From the view of opportunity cost of rural families ’ deforestation for farmland reclamation, a dynamic game model about government and rural families is built in this paper. The research draws a conclusion that whether the rural families make a decision of deforestation for farmland reclamation is decided not only by the net earnings after deforestation for farmland reclamation, but also by the opportunity cost of shifting families’labour force. Finally, four suggestions are given for the achievement consolidation of the Grain for Green Project.
  • Related Articles

    [1]WU Juan, YAO Yao, XING Hong, WU Cheng-liang, CHEN Jian-cheng. Evaluation of Farmer's Satisfaction at Supporting Measures of Collective Forest Tenure Reform:A Case Study in Fujian Province[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2014, 13(4): 78-82.
    [2]QIAO Yue, LANG Zheng-xin, ZHAO Jing, WEN Ya-li. Farmers'Forest Right Mortgage Loan Behavior in Sanming City and Analysis of Its Influence Factors[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2013, 12(4): 42-47.
    [3]LI Yu-hui, HAN Ai-gui, KE Shui-fa. Impacting Factors of Farmers Purchasing Wooden Building Materials Products: Based on Survey Data in 12 Pilot Provinces and Municipality City[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2013, 12(1): 63-68.
    [4]LIU Min. Effect of Collective Forest Tenure Reform on Farmers’Planting Trees:Data from Plain Areas of Henan Province[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2012, 11(4): 91-96.
    [5]GAO Xin, XU Yu-peng, SHI Dao-jin. Empirical Analysis of Factors Affecting Farmers’ Demand of Forestryright Mortgage Loan: Based on a Survey of Farmers in Suichang County of Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2011, 10(4): 65-71.
    [6]KE Shui-fa, LI Hong-xun, WEN Ya-li. Transfer of Collective Forestland Usufruct from the Household’s Perspective:Taking Households Survey in Tonggu and Jing’an Counties of Jiangxi Province as Examples[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2010, 9(4): 98-103.
    [7]YANG Lin, SHI Dao-Jin. Empirical Study on Influence Factors of Farmers’ Forest Insurance Demand: Based on Investigation of 156 Farmers in Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2010, 9(3): 103-107.
    [8]XIE Yi, WEN Ya-li. Empirical Study on the Influence Factors of Farmers’Forestland and Stumpages Transfer[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2009, 8(4): 48-54.
    [9]KE Shui-fa, ZHAO Tie-zhen. Behavior Choice Mechanism of Farmer Households Participating in Convertion of Cropland to Forest Program[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2008, 7(3): 52-56.
    [10]ZHU Hai_yang, XU Yuan, ZHANG Xiao_li. Differences and Solutions on Financing Refrain of Rural Family Productive Credit in Eastern China——Viewed from Rural Family Investigations in Shanghai Suburbs[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2005, 4(2): 74-78.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(20)

    1. 向磊,黄雅婷,杨晨,王见. 农户退耕还林成果维护行为影响因素研究. 山西农经. 2023(04): 18-23 .
    2. 周银花,赵有贤,胡延杰,张坤,王兰会. 全国19省区退耕还林工程农户复耕意愿影响因素分析. 林业资源管理. 2021(02): 1-10 .
    3. 胡原,曾维忠,龚荣发. 退耕农户参与森林碳汇的现实困境与改进对策. 生态经济. 2021(08): 100-104+147 .
    4. 韦惠兰,白雪. 退耕还林影响农户生计策略的表现与机制. 生态经济. 2019(09): 121-127 .
    5. 任林静,黎洁. 退耕还林政策交替期退耕农户土地利用意愿研究——基于制度约束的影响分析. 干旱区资源与环境. 2018(08): 52-58 .
    6. 杨娜,李桦,孙熠. 农户退耕成果维护意愿与行为一致性研究. 湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版). 2018(05): 27-33 .
    7. 任林静,黎洁. 退耕还林政策交替期补偿到期农户复耕意愿研究. 中国人口·资源与环境. 2017(11): 132-140 .
    8. 崔方茹,支玲,杨芳. 基于农户层面的退耕还林工程评价方法研究综述. 林业调查规划. 2016(05): 131-134 .
    9. 石春娜,姚顺波. 新一轮退耕还林优先区选择研究:一个文献综述. 林业经济. 2016(03): 66-69 .
    10. 张伟正,翟红霞. 2013年彭阳县巩固退耕还林成果项目建设工作总结. 现代农业科技. 2015(22): 175+178 .
    11. 谢晨,黄东,于慧,袁梅,彭伟,彭道黎,吴涛. 政府监督和农户决策:巩固退耕还林成果因素分析——基于24省2120户退耕农户的调查结果. 林业经济. 2014(03): 9-15 .
    12. 聂博,马宁,朱厚强,贺立. 我国西部地区农户保持退耕还林成果意愿影响因素分析. 林业经济. 2014(04): 72-76 .
    13. 李荣耀,张钟毓. 基于农户受偿意愿的林地管护补偿标准研究——以陕西省吴起县为例. 林业经济. 2013(10): 70-76 .
    14. 任林静,黎洁. 陕西安康山区退耕户的复耕意愿及影响因素分析. 资源科学. 2013(12): 2426-2433 .
    15. 蒋峰. 后退耕时代退耕林管护激励机制研究——基于对陕北的实地调查. 湖北农业科学. 2012(09): 1935-1938 .
    16. 王昌海,曹世雄,温亚利,李强,司开创,胡崇德. 秦岭自然保护区群成本效益研究(Ⅱ)——成本效益预测. 资源科学. 2012(07): 1362-1368 .
    17. 赵从举,毕华,张斌,吴倡仪. 海南西部退耕还林还草生态补偿政策的效果评估. 安徽农业科学. 2011(04): 2107-2109 .
    18. 王术华,支玲,张媛. 退耕还林后期农户复耕意愿选择研究分析——以甘肃省安定区为例. 林业经济问题. 2010(06): 478-481 .
    26. 戎晓红. 退耕还林工程经济补偿机制研究——以雅安市雨城区为例. 中国人口.资源与环境. 2011(S1): 448-450 .
    30. 赵冠楠,金世华,蒋峰,贾丽丽,李荣耀. 后退耕时代:成果管护行为、意愿与激励机制研究. 中国人口.资源与环境. 2011(S2): 143-147 .

    Other cited types(23)

Catalog

    Article views (2180) PDF downloads (0) Cited by(43)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return