Advanced search
WU Jian-ping, ZI Fei, LIU Xian-wei, WANG Guang-xin, YANG Zhi-hui, LI Ming, YE Liu-hong, JIANG Jin-hua, LI Qiu-ling. Measurement of New Ecological Paradigm: Revision and Application of NEP Scale in China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2012, 11(4): 8-13.
Citation: WU Jian-ping, ZI Fei, LIU Xian-wei, WANG Guang-xin, YANG Zhi-hui, LI Ming, YE Liu-hong, JIANG Jin-hua, LI Qiu-ling. Measurement of New Ecological Paradigm: Revision and Application of NEP Scale in China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2012, 11(4): 8-13.

Measurement of New Ecological Paradigm: Revision and Application of NEP Scale in China

More Information
  • Published Date: November 29, 2012
  • This paper introduces contents of the New Ecological Paradigm(NEP)and its related researches, revises the NEP scale which is applied in environmental psychology and sociology, and tests the Chinese characteristic of the NEP. The reliability and validity of the NEP scale are good as an important tool of researching ecological values and ecological consciousness. 278 college students and 11 620 citizens participated in the investigation. Results of exploratory factor analysis show that there are two dimensions existed in the NEP scale in China, i.e. the New Environmental Paradigm and the Human Exceptionalism Paradigm. This twodimension model is supported by confirmatory factor analysis, and fit indices of the models are all above 0.90. The internal concordance coefficient of the NEP scale is 0.810, the splithalf reliability is 0.822, both of which meet the standard of the psychometrics. There are significant differences in genders, ages, education, resident place before 10 years old, and living years in present resident place among subjects. This study shows that the Chinese urban residents are gradually enhancing their ecological consciousness, cities in China are undergoing an ecological paradigm shift from traditional society paradigm to the new ecological paradigm.
  • Related Articles

    [1]Zhang Yijin, Xiao Jianxiu, Hou Fangmiao. Impact of Export Technology Complexity on Carbon Emissions of Forestry Industry in China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2024, 23(4): 34-42. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2023141
    [2]Chai Mei, Tian Minghua, Du Lei, Wang Fang, Liu Dan. Possibility of Reducing China's Wood Dependence on Foreign Trade[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2022, 21(1): 19-28. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2021171
    [3]ZOU Ying, YANG Zhi-hui. Green Contact Index Questionnaire: Development, Reliability and Validity[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2018, 17(2): 78-83. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2017036
    [4]DAI Hu-xuan, ZONG Cheng, LEE Chun-hong, MA Jian-zhang. Motivation, Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment of Environmental Volunteers in Taiwan, China: Cases of Taroko and Yangmingshan National Parks[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2015, 14(2): 34-40.
    [5]WU Juan, YAO Yao, XING Hong, WU Cheng-liang, CHEN Jian-cheng. Evaluation of Farmer's Satisfaction at Supporting Measures of Collective Forest Tenure Reform:A Case Study in Fujian Province[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2014, 13(4): 78-82.
    [6]CUI Yi-chen, YIN Jie. Interpreting Maslow爷s Hierarchy of Needs from Perspective of Ecological Psychology[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2013, 12(3): 24-28.
    [7]ZI Fei, YANG Zhi-hui, ZHANG Fan, TIAN Hao, WANG Guang-xin, WU Jian-ping, LIU Yang, FANG Gang, XIANG Jin-jing, FANG Ran. Report of Environment Satisfaction and Life Satisfaction in 10 Cities in China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2012, 11(4): 1-6.
    [8]LI Cui-cui1, XU Cheng-yang1, ZHANG Zhi-du1, GONG Lan1, LI Bo, JIN Gui-xiang, CHEN Shu-hua. Residents’ Satisfaction on Country Parks in Beijing[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2010, 9(2): 68-72.
    [9]ZHANG Hao, XU Ping. Effectiveness of Criminal Enforcement of Environmental Law in European Union[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2010, 9(1): 54-58.
    [10]Tian Zhiwei. Public Finance: a Reliable and Stable Assurance for China’s Sustainable Forestry Development[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2004, 3(2): 27-31.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(29)

    1. 耿炎,雅茹,李杰,刘昊煜,范鑫荣,王镇. “明知却微行”——大学生环境意识和环保行为的知行差距. 内蒙古师范大学学报(自然科学汉文版). 2023(01): 1-6+117 .
    2. 周林焱,李凤亭,单习章. 基于四个独立样本的中国版环境关心量表(CNEP)的检验. 干旱区资源与环境. 2022(02): 78-83 .
    3. 顾璇,黄碧钰,吴建平. 家长对自然活动的态度与儿童环保行为:儿童接触自然和自然联结的链式中介效应. 中国健康心理学杂志. 2022(01): 80-85 .
    4. 尹月香,邓彩霞. 基于CNEP量表青海省居民环境关心调查分析. 法制与社会. 2021(10): 131-133 .
    5. 龙燕棱,谢玲平,伍秦山. 大学生新生态范式与亲环境行为的关系. 现代交际. 2021(22): 63-65 .
    6. 王博,顾璇,王沙. 青少年自然缺失量表的编制. 心理技术与应用. 2020(09): 559-568 .
    7. 周敏,杨玉婷. 乐趣、利益还是道德驱使?——从目标框架理论看环境传播对个体环保行动的影响. 现代视听. 2020(06): 27-34 .
    8. 刘静佳. 基于NEP量表的国家公园环境教育需求研究——以普达措国家公园为例. 林业与生态科学. 2020(03): 343-352 .
    9. 王哲. 高收入者更关心环境吗?——基于调查数据的经验研究. 兰州学刊. 2020(10): 143-152 .
    10. 雷茵茹,崔丽娟,李伟,张曼胤,王汝苗,王萍. 环境教育对青少年亲环境行为的影响作用分析——以湿地科普宣教教育为例. 科普研究. 2019(01): 64-70+109-110 .
    11. 欧耀文,东梅. 新生态范式量表在宁夏生态移民迁入区的应用评估. 农业科学研究. 2019(01): 8-14 .
    12. 姚泽阳,段玉山. 地理核心素养下高中生人地观念的测量分析. 中国考试. 2019(11): 14-21 .
    13. 耿柳娜,卓敏. 环境问题研究的反思:环境心理学的视角. 南京工业大学学报(社会科学版). 2018(01): 78-96 .
    14. 张晶晶,余真真,田浩. 亲环境行为的情理整合模型:生态情感卷入的作用. 心理技术与应用. 2018(08): 484-492+512 .
    15. 徐娜,孔令玲,曲海英. 山东省烟台市居民环境态度与环境行为的调查研究. 中国健康教育. 2018(06): 515-518 .
    16. 郭强,张燕林,王文怡. 生态价值观、社会责任感对绿色创业意愿的影响——基于绿色创业动机的中介作用. 创新与创业管理. 2018(02): 90-101 .
    17. 周旗,张盼峰,宋佃星. 陕西省公众环境关心现状及其影响因子研究. 干旱区资源与环境. 2017(02): 1-7 .
    18. 刘贤伟,邹洋. 青年群体生态价值观的结构、现状与特点——基于我国10个城市的实证研究. 干旱区资源与环境. 2017(09): 7-13 .
    19. 龚文娟,梁迪. 环境、社会与绿色发展——2016年第五届中国环境社会学学术研讨会综述. 南京工业大学学报(社会科学版). 2017(01): 73-83 .
    20. 吴灵琼,朱艳. 新生态范式(NEP)量表在我国城市学生群体中的修订及信度、效度检验. 南京工业大学学报(社会科学版). 2017(02): 53-61 .
    21. 范叶超. 项目措辞方向与NEP量表在中国应用的再评估. 南京工业大学学报(社会科学版). 2017(02): 62-69 .
    22. 杨盈,耿柳娜,相鹏,张晶,朱丽芳. 自然关联性:概念、测量、功能及干预. 心理科学进展. 2017(08): 1360-1374 .
    23. 肖宝军,刘颖. 教师生态价值观的现状分析及对区域可持续发展教育的启示——基于北京市通州区部分教师的NEP量表调查. 北京教育学院学报. 2016(02): 1-7 .
    24. 刘颖. 学生生态价值观的现状调查及对可持续发展教育的启示. 新课程教学(电子版). 2016(07): 4-6 .
    25. 李海洲,陈衍. 国内外环境意识研究进展. 牡丹江教育学院学报. 2015(06): 116-118 .
    26. 洪大用,龚文娟. 行进在快车道上的中国环境社会学. 南京工业大学学报(社会科学版). 2015(04): 5-16 .
    27. 洪大用,范叶超,邓霞秋,曲天词. 中国公众环境关心的年龄差异分析. 青年研究. 2015(01): 1-10+94 .
    28. 洪大用,范叶超,肖晨阳. 检验环境关心量表的中国版(CNEP)——基于CGSS2010数据的再分析. 社会学研究. 2014(04): 49-72+243 .
    29. 刘贤伟,吴建平. 大学生环境价值观与亲环境行为:环境关心的中介作用. 心理与行为研究. 2013(06): 780-785 .

    Other cited types(39)

Catalog

    Article views (2109) PDF downloads (68) Cited by(68)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return