Advanced search
FENG Li-jie. The Paranoid Feature of Modernity Ecological Civilization's Internal Development Logic in Dialectic of Enlightenment[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2014, 13(4): 1-6.
Citation: FENG Li-jie. The Paranoid Feature of Modernity Ecological Civilization's Internal Development Logic in Dialectic of Enlightenment[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2014, 13(4): 1-6.

The Paranoid Feature of Modernity Ecological Civilization's Internal Development Logic in Dialectic of Enlightenment

More Information
  • Published Date: February 10, 2015
  • There exist rich ideas of ecological civilization in Dialectic of Enlightenment. It holds that modern ecological crisis results from rational metaphysics, not capitalism value-added logic. The historical evolution from enlightenment rationality to instrumental rationality is the witness of the ecological civilization's internal development logic. In contrast to Marx's critique of capitalist modernity, critical theory of instrumental rationality isn't based on the actual material production practice. Therefore it doesn't show us an effective approach to natural liberation and human freedom. Nevertheless, many correct and penetrating views about eco-development in Dialectic of Enlightenment have important inspirations for the construction of ecological civilization in China.
  • Related Articles

    [1]Liu Yingxiao, Lin Zhen. Construction and Measurement Analysis of Evaluation Index System for Agricultural Green Development[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2023, 22(2): 36-43. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2022061
    [2]Zhang Xiuqin. On the Establishment of Chinese Ecological Civilization System in the Wider Context of Once-in-a-Century Changes Taking Place in the World[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2022, 21(2): 9-14. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2021338
    [3]CHEN Jun-zhi, TANG Xiao-ping. Research on the Establishment of National Parks Protection System in China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2020, 19(1): 1-12. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2020006
    [4]TANG Xiao-ping, ZHANG Yun-yi, LIANG Bing-kuan, SONG Tian-yu, CHEN Jun-zhi. Construction of the Planning System of China's National Parks[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2019, 18(1): 5-12. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2018153
    [5]WEI Wang-xi, XIE Yi, YU Shang-hong. On Current Institution and Countermeasures for Solving the Tenure Disputes of Collective Forests:A Case Study in a County of Jiangxi Province[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2016, 15(2): 48-53. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2016008
    [6]ZHANG Xu-feng, WU Shui-rong, NING You-liang. An Analysis on China's Institutional Change of Collective Forest Tenure System and Its Economic Motivation[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2015, 14(1): 57-63. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2015.01.001
    [7]JIANG He, LI Xi-ling, PENG Zuo-deng. The Construction of China's Silviculture Standard System[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2014, 13(1): 77-82.
    [8]LUO Hua-li. Enlightenment of Ancient Environment Construction and Official Assessment System[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2013, 12(2): 79-83.
    [9]WANG Jun_wu, ZHANG Shu_lin, GONG Lian_hua. Constructing Real Estate Project Characterized by Sustainable Development[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2005, 4(2): 83-85.
    [10]Yu Ling, Yan Shuai, Xie Jialu. The Connotations and Basic Characteristics of Forest Certification System[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2004, 3(4): 48-52.

Catalog

    Article views (693) PDF downloads (140) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return