新时代背景下行政诉权行使的合理限度——诉权保障的逆向思考
The Reasonable Limit in the Exercise of Petition Right to Governmental Administrations in the New Era: The Reverse Thinking for the Protection of the Petition Right
-
摘要: “保障当事人诉权”是司法改革中的基础环节和核心命题之一。在行政诉讼实践中主要有“问题导向”型和“理念贯彻”型两种正面推进思路, 但一味正面推进势必会增加其矫枉过正的潜在风险。从反向角度探寻行政诉权行使的合理(最小)限度, 借以明确诉权保障之推进场域, 不失为一全新思路。行政诉权行使限度以事物限度理论与权利限度理论为正当性来源, 并以司法资源的有限性、司法解决行政纠纷能力的有限性以及司法的谦抑性为考量因素。在诉权层次理论付之阙如的当下, 行政诉权行使的合理限度应当以现行的起诉方式、起诉条件为准, 且当事人以言之有理为限, 法院以形式比对、核对为度。至于行政滥诉等行为的风险防控, 可由当事人签署具结书的形式得以实现。Abstract: "Protecting the litigant's right" is one of the basic links and core propositions in the judicial reform. In the practice of petition right to governmental administrations there are mainly two positive propulsion ideas of "problem oriented" and "concept implemented", but blindly positive propulsion must result in the increase of the potential risk of overcorrecting. It is a new idea to explore the reasonable (minimum) limit in the practice of petition right to governmental administrations from the reverse aspect. The exercise limit of petition right to governmental administrations is using the theory of object limitation and the theory of right limit as the source of legitimacy, and takes the finiteness of judicial resources, the limitation of judicial settlement in administrative disputes and the modesty of judicature as the considerations. In the absence of petition right level theory at present, the reasonable limit in the exercise of the petition right should be based on the rules as such, the current prosecution way and the prosecution conditions should prevail, reasonable parties' statements should be as the limit, and court' s alignment and verification should be as the degree. Regarding the risk prevention and control of abuse in petition right to governmental administrations, it should be conducted by involved parties to sign an agreement.