高级检索

典型国家公园体制比较分析

Comparative Analysis of National Park System in Typical Countries

  • 摘要: 以美国、加拿大、德国、英国、瑞典、澳大利亚、新西兰、南非、日本、韩国共10个国家为研究对象,对其国家公园体制进行了系统总结和对比分析。结果表明:①在国家公园的概念界定和准入条件上,各国的国家公园概念界定与国际自然保护联盟的定义在本质上基本相同,在准入条件方面则重点关注资源的独特性和重要性、受人类活动的影响较小、景观和生态环境的吸引力等方面。②在国家公园管理体制上,法律体系方面,各国均形成了国家公园管理专项法规与其他相关法规相结合的较为完善的法律体系;管理机制方面,各国形成了自上而下型、自上而下与地方自治相结合型、地方自治型3种管理体系,其中以自上而下的垂直管理体制为主;资金机制方面,大部分国家的资金主要来自于国家财政拨款;经营机制方面,管理与经营相分离的制度、较低的门票收费制度、强化社区参与以及重视生态环境保护是各国国家公园经营管理的主要特色。基于上述国家的国家公园体制建设经验,可从国家公园选定准入条件、专项政策法规、资金投入、管理权与经营权相分离、社区参与、生态建设与环境保护等方面推动我国国家公园体制的建立和完善。

     

    Abstract: In this paper, we summarized and analyzed the national park system of ten countries, namely the United States, Canada, Germany, the United Kingdom, Sweden, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Japan, and South Korea. Results are shown as follows. ① As for the concept definition and entry conditions of national parks, the definition from the IUCN is basically adopted by each country. In the entry conditions of national parks, they mostly focus on three aspects, which are resource's peculiarity and significance, little impact of human activities, and the attraction of landscape and ecological environment. ② As for the management system of national parks, there are many features. Firstly, in legal system, each country has developed special laws and regulations, which are well combinative with other relevant laws and regulations. Secondly, in management mechanism, there are three types, which are from top to bottom, local self-government, and the combined type. Thirdly, in fund, national parks of most countries are funded mainly by state financial allocations. Fourthly, in operation and management mechanism, there are four features, which are separation in management and administration, low price tickets, strengthening community participation and paying attention to environmental protection. All of these things can give important enlightenment for the establishment of national parks in China.

     

/

返回文章
返回