高级检索
刘炳薪, 贺超. 基于选择实验法的农户林权转出偏好分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 18(4): 47-53. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2018179
引用本文: 刘炳薪, 贺超. 基于选择实验法的农户林权转出偏好分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 18(4): 47-53. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2018179
LIU Bing-xin, HE Chao. Analysis of Farmers’ Preference for the Transfer of Forest Rights Based on the Selective Experiment Method[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2019, 18(4): 47-53. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2018179
Citation: LIU Bing-xin, HE Chao. Analysis of Farmers’ Preference for the Transfer of Forest Rights Based on the Selective Experiment Method[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2019, 18(4): 47-53. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2018179

基于选择实验法的农户林权转出偏好分析

Analysis of Farmers’ Preference for the Transfer of Forest Rights Based on the Selective Experiment Method

  • 摘要: 采用选择实验法分析了辽宁省10个样本县的478户农户对不同林权转出方案的偏好及接受价格。结果显示:转出林地价格、林业经营支持政策项数、城乡社保统筹程度、外出务工机会可能性、进城落户难易程度、资源利用政策封闭程度对农户林权转出偏好影响显著,其中林地转出价格、林业经营支持政策项数、城乡社保统筹程度、外出务工机会可能性的影响为正,进城落户难易程度、资源利用政策封闭程度的影响为负;家庭林地面积、林业补贴金额和家庭总收入显著影响农户对林权转出的偏好,家庭林地面积对农户转出林权意愿的影响为负,林业补贴金额和家庭总收入的影响为正。为促进农户转出林权,一方面要完善相关配套扶持政策,吸引其进行林权流转,另一方面还要统筹城乡福利水平,保障农户的基本生存福利。

     

    Abstract: This study used the selective experiment method to analyze the preference and acceptance of 478 households in 10 sample counties in Liaoning Province for different transfer rights. The results show that: the price of forestland transfer, the number of forestry supportive policies, the degree of urban and rural social security coordination, the possibility of going out to work, the difficulty of being a city-dweller, and the degree of closure of resources utilization policies have significant impacts on farmers’ preference for forestry rights transfer, of which forestland is transferred out. The impacts of price, the number of forestry supportive policies, urban and rural social security planning, and the possibility of going out to work are positive, whilst the impacts of the difficulty of settling in the city and the degree of closure of resource utilization policies are negative. The forest land area per family, forestry subsidies and total household income significantly influencing the farmers’ preference for the transfer of forest rights, of which, the impact of household forestland area on farmers’ willingness to transfer forest rights is negative, whilst the impact of forestry subsidies and total household income is positive. It is suggested that, to promote farmers’ outflow of forest rights, related supporting policies should be improved, and we must coordinate the urban and rural welfare levels to protect the basic living and welfare of farmers.

     

/

返回文章
返回