高级检索

游客的乡土景观特征感知及地方感研究

以安徽西溪南村为例

姚铭铭, 李薇航, 林诗雨, 蔡君

姚铭铭, 李薇航, 林诗雨, 蔡君. 游客的乡土景观特征感知及地方感研究——

以安徽西溪南村为例

[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 21(4): 79-87. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2021243
引用本文: 姚铭铭, 李薇航, 林诗雨, 蔡君. 游客的乡土景观特征感知及地方感研究——

以安徽西溪南村为例

[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 21(4): 79-87. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2021243
Yao Mingming, Li Weihang, Lin Shiyu, Cai Jun. Characteristics of Vernacular Landscape of Traditional Villages and Visitors Perception: A Case Study of Xixi South Village[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2022, 21(4): 79-87. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2021243
Citation: Yao Mingming, Li Weihang, Lin Shiyu, Cai Jun. Characteristics of Vernacular Landscape of Traditional Villages and Visitors Perception: A Case Study of Xixi South Village[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2022, 21(4): 79-87. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2021243

游客的乡土景观特征感知及地方感研究——

以安徽西溪南村为例

基金项目: 科技部国家重点研发计划“乡村生态景观物种多样性维护技术研究”(2019YFD11004032)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    姚铭铭,硕士生。主要研究方向:风景园林、旅游规划。Email:625268113@qq.com 地址:100083 北京林业大学园林学院

    责任作者:

    蔡君,教授。主要研究方向:风景园林、旅游规划。Email:junecai1102@live.cn 地址:100083 北京林业大学园林学院

Characteristics of Vernacular Landscape of Traditional Villages and Visitors Perception: A Case Study of Xixi South Village

  • 摘要:

    乡土景观是乡村环境和文化多样性的重要载体。以安徽西溪南村为例,运用因子分析、回归分析等方法探讨游客的乡土景观特征感知和地方感及两者之间的内在关系。研究发现:乡土景观特征感知的5个维度,即自然景观、乡土聚落、田园景观、传统文化与乡土乡情得分均较高且个体差异甚微;地方感的3个维度,即地方情感、地方认知与行为意愿个体存在明显差异;同时乡土景观特征感知对于游客构建地方感有正向的促进作用,地方感的地方认知和地方情感要素具有相互促进作用,地方情感以及地方认知对游客的行为意愿也有正向促进作用。最后在研究结论和调查的基础上对传统村落发展提出了建议。

    Abstract:

    Vernacular landscape is an important carrier of rural environment and cultural diversity. Taking Xixi South Village in Anhui Province as an example, this paper explores tourists' perception of vernacular landscape characteristics and sense of place and the relationship between them through factor analysis and regression analysis. The five dimensions of perception on vernacular landscape characteristics, i.e., natural landscape, vernacular building, farming landscape, traditional cultural and local feeling, have high scores and there are few individual differences among tourists. Sense of place has three dimensions, namely place emotion, place cognition and behavioral intention, and there are obvious differences among tourists. At the same time, the perception on vernacular landscape characteristics has a positive role in promoting the construction of tourists' sense of place. Local cognition and local emotion of the sense of place promote each other, and local emotion and local cognition also positively promote tourists' behavioral intention. Finally, based on the research findings, we propose suggestions for the development of traditional villages, which will provide a reference for traditional villages to explore the deep meaning of vernacular landscape characteristics from a multi-dimensional perspective, establish sense of place, and promote the sustainable development of rural tourism.

  • 图  1   乡土景观特征感知与地方感模型

    表  1   生活地类型与乡土景观特征感知相关性

    乡土景观特征感知童年生活地类型现在生活地类型
    显著性显著性
    自然景观 0.298 0.095
    乡土聚落 0.397 0.388
    田园景观 0.003 0.001
    传统文化 0.304 0.176
    乡土乡情 0.092 0.262
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   乡土景观特征感知分析表

    乡土景观特征感知指标得分因子载荷
    公因子测量指标均值整体均值标准差方差自然景观乡土聚落田园景观传统文化乡土乡情
    自然景观 气候舒适宜人 4.403 4.403 0.692 0.480 0.505 0.148 0.142 0.131 0.399
    植被茂盛,空气清新 4.585 0.584 0.341 0.771 0.067 0.199 0.014 0.156
    生态环境好 4.340 0.829 0.688 0.706 0.146 0.027 0.207 0.175
    村中有上百年的古树 4.196 0.942 0.887 0.708 0.106 0.203 0.219 0.173
    山水风光美丽 4.389 0.791 0.626 0.652 0.271 0.106 0.205 0.088
    乡土聚落 村落的传统风貌保存完好 4.103 4.058 0.916 0.840 0.148 0.773 0.012 0.192 0.217
    村中房屋是传统徽派建筑 4.128 0.886 0.785 0.246 0.771 0.150 0.142 0.069
    村中祠堂保存完好 3.900 0.913 0.833 0.060 0.768 0.299 0.177 0.046
    村中历史构筑保存完好 4.021 0.916 0.838 0.097 0.787 0.203 0.202 0.200
    村落格局保存完好 4.138 0.866 0.750 0.262 0.550 0.349 0.146 0.157
    田园景观 村民生活与土地关系密切 4.061 3.882 0.871 0.758 0.176 0.154 0.774 0.124 0.139
    田地齐整,管理良好 3.881 0.906 0.820 0.095 0.257 0.822 0.185 0.110
    传统的农业设施仍然发挥作用 3.830 0.955 0.913 0.125 0.269 0.703 0.198 0.221
    在田间地头可以看到当地村民在耕作 3.758 1.055 1.114 0.193 0.166 0.714 0.330 0.109
    传统文化 当地有“四雕”等传统技艺 3.981 3.922 0.935 0.873 0.117 0.337 0.191 0.690 0.145
    当地人之间仍以方言交流 3.937 0.995 0.989 0.178 0.082 0.343 0.654 0.147
    传统民俗特色鲜明 3.984 0.965 0.932 0.091 0.282 0.087 0.746 0.269
    有丰富的人物、典故或传说 3.786 1.014 1.029 0.081 0.257 0.251 0.696 0.159
    乡土乡情 村落氛围安静祥和 4.138 4.256 0.933 0.871 0.268 0.033 0.421 0.125 0.446
    当地的土特产品质优良 4.175 0.920 0.846 0.176 0.298 0.138 0.303 0.645
    村民淳朴善良,对游客亲切友好 4.350 0.791 0.625 0.092 0.125 0.209 0.219 0.839
    村民友善和睦,人际关系和谐 4.359 0.777 0.604 0.091 0.146 0.161 0.227 0.830
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3   地方感分析表

    地方感指标得分因子载荷
    公因子测量指标均值整体均值标准差方差地方情感地方认知行为意愿
    地方情感 在这里我感到舒适和放松 4.256 3.929 0.880 0.775 0.870 0.206 0.140
    这里使我感到精神振奋 4.030 0.943 0.889 0.833 0.325 0.112
    在这里我仿佛回到了无忧无虑的童年时光 3.671 1.088 1.184 0.540 0.601 0.163
    我很喜爱并且留恋这个村落 3.758 1.017 1.035 0.611 0.564 0.211
    地方认知 这里的风土人情和我的故乡相似 3.478 3.441 1.143 1.306 0.056 0.822 0.013
    我在这里有归属感 3.347 1.116 1.246 0.228 0.839 0.120
    在这里的旅游体验比其他地方都愉快 3.664 1.011 1.023 0.327 0.761 0.107
    这里对我而言有重要的意义 3.275 1.162 1.349 0.279 0.805 0.103
    行为意愿 我会带这里的土特产回去 2.991 3.353 1.180 1.392 0.007 0.247 0.802
    如果有时间,我愿意再次来这里旅游 3.786 1.088 1.183 0.477 0.544 0.230
    如果条件允许,我愿意在这里长住 3.322 1.154 1.331 0.335 0.662 0.259
    我会带亲密的人来玩,或者把这里推荐给亲友 3.555 1.211 1.467 0.334 0.017 0.752
    我会贡献时间/金钱让这里变得更好 3.114 1.145 1.312 0.097 0.119 0.875
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4   乡土景观特征感知与地方感相关性

    地方情感地方认知行为意愿
    自然景观 0.422 0.383 0.312
    乡土聚落 0.324 0.359 0.315
    田园景观 0.447 0.447 0.351
    传统文化 0.436 0.471 0.391
    乡土乡情 0.460 0.454 0.366
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5   乡土景观特征感知与地方感回归分析

    模型非标准化系数B标准系数Betat检验值显著性共线性统计量
    容差VIF
    地方情感 自然景观 0.310
    (0.072)
    0.203 4.300 0.000 0.730 1.370
    乡土乡情 0.248
    (0.070)
    0.194 3.543 0.000 0.543 1.843
    田园景观 0.180
    (0.057)
    0.171 3.185 0.002 0.563 1.775
    传统文化 0.138
    (0.059)
    0.130 2.317 0.021 0.521 1.919
    地方认知 传统文化 0.249
    (0.067)
    0.209 3.720 0.000 0.521 1.919
    乡土乡情 0.242
    (0.079)
    0.169 3.071 0.002 0.543 1.843
    自然景观 0.251
    (0.081)
    0.147 3.092 0.002 0.730 1.370
    田园景观 0.193
    (0.064)
    0.163 3.016 0.003 0.563 1.775
    地方情感 地方认知 0.619
    (0.031)
    0.697 20.098 0.000 1.000 1.000
    地方认知 地方情感 0.785
    (0.039)
    0.697 20.098 0.000 1.000 1.000
    行为意愿 地方情感 0.461
    (0.052)
    0.466 8.946 0.000 0.514 1.946
    地方认知 0.192
    (0.046)
    0.219 4.200 0.000 0.514 1.946
    注:括号内为标准误差。
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    LEWIS P K. Axioms for reading the landscape some guides to the American scene[J]. The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes. Geographical Essays,1979:33-48.

    [2] 俞孔坚,王志芳,黄国平. 论乡土景观及其对现代景观设计的意义[J]. 华中建筑,2005(4):123-126. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-739X.2005.04.039
    [3] 张维亚,严伟,汤澍. 旅游者地方感、自我效能感、社会责任感与满意度关系研究−以遗产旅游地为例[J]. 资源开发与市场,2015,31(1):112-116. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8141.2015.01.027
    [4] 彭兆荣. 论乡土社会中之诸二元关系[J]. 兰州学刊,2018(10):65-74. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3492.2018.10.007
    [5] 陈义勇,俞孔坚. 美国乡土景观研究理论与实践−《发现乡土景观》导读[J]. 人文地理,2013,28(1):155-160.
    [6]

    PRATT A C. Discourses of rurality:loose talk or social struggle?[J]. Journal of Rural Studies,1996,12(1):69-78. doi: 10.1016/0743-0167(95)00046-1

    [7]

    BUNCE M . The countryside ideal: Anglo-American images of landscape[M]. London and New York: Routledge, 1994.

    [8]

    CANIZARO V. Architectural regionalism: collected writings on place, identity, modernity, and tradition[M]. New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 2007.

    [9] 岳邦瑞,郎小龙,张婷婷,等. 我国乡土景观研究的发展历程、学科领域及其评述[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2012,20(12):1563-1570.
    [10] 单霁翔. 乡土建筑遗产保护理念与方法研究(上)[J]. 城市规划,2008(12):33-39,52. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-1329.2008.12.008
    [11] 谢治菊. 转型期我国乡土文化的断裂与乡土教育的复兴[J]. 福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012(4):156-161.
    [12] 钱云,庄子莹. 乡土景观研究视野与方法及风景园林学实践[J]. 中国园林,2014,30(12):31-35. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2014.12.008
    [13]

    ZAKARIYA K,IBRAHIM P H,WAHAB N. Conceptual framework of rural landscape character assessment to guide tourism development in rural areas[J]. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries,2019,24(1):85-99. doi: 10.21315/jcdc2019.24.1.5

    [14]

    HASUIKE T,KATAGIRI H,TSUBAKI H,et al. Interactive multi-objective route planning for sightseeing on time-expanded networks under various conditions[J]. Procedia Computer Science,2013,22:221-230. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.098

    [15]

    AGAPITO D,MENDES J,VALLE P. Exploring the conceptualization of the sensory dimension of tourist experiences[J]. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management,2014,2(2):62-73.

    [16]

    CHOI H S,SIRAKAYA E. Measuring residents' attitude toward sustainable tourism:development of sustainable tourism attitude scale[J]. Journal of Travel Research,2005,43(4):380-394. doi: 10.1177/0047287505274651

    [17] 谢志晶,卞新民. 基于AVC理论的乡村景观综合评价[J]. 江苏农业科学,2011,39(2):266-269. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1302.2011.02.092
    [18]

    JONES M, STENSEKE M. The European landscape convention: challenges of participation[M]. Dordrecht: Springer Dordrecht, 2011.

    [19] 刘奔腾,段嘉元,严海慧,等. 面向传统村落旅游的乡土景观吸引力评价−以兰州市永丰村为例[J]. 西北师范大学学报(自然科学版),2021,57(4):46-53.
    [20] 段义孚. 恋地情结: 环境感知、态度和价值观研究[M]. 志丞, 刘苏, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2019.
    [21]

    RELPH E. Place and placelessness[M]. London: Pion,1976.

    [22]

    STEELE F . The sense of place[M]. Belmont: CBI Publishing Company, 1981.

    [23]

    MASSEY D B. Space, place, and gender[M]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994.

    [24] 孔翔,王惠,侯铁铖. 历史文化商业街经营者的地方感研究−基于黄山市屯溪老街案例[J]. 地域研究与开发,2015(4):105-110. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2363.2015.04.020
    [25] 汪芳,黄晓辉,俞曦. 旅游地地方感的游客认知研究[J]. 地理学报,2009,64(10):1267-1277. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2009.10.012
    [26]

    DONOVAN K,GKARTZIOS M. Architecture and rural planning:'claiming the vernacular'[J]. Land Use Policy,2014,41:334-343. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.06.013

    [27] 周俭,钟晓华. 发展视角下的乡村遗产保护路径探讨−侗族村寨田野工作案例[J]. 城市规划学刊,2015(1):54-60.
    [28] 樊友猛,谢彦君. 记忆、展示与凝视:乡村文化遗产保护与旅游发展协同研究[J]. 旅游科学,2015,29(1):11-24,87. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-575X.2015.01.002
    [29]

    GALAN J,BOURGEAU F,PEDROLI B. A multidimensional model for the vernacular:linking disciplines and connecting the vernacular landscape to sustainability challenges[J]. Sustainability,2020,12(16):6347. doi: 10.3390/su12166347

    [30]

    LAGRO J A. Landscape context of rural residential development in southeastern Wisconsin (USA)[J]. Landscape Ecology,1998,13(2):65-77. doi: 10.1023/A:1007943304840

    [31]

    ONATE J J,ANDERSEN E,PECO B,et al. Agri-environmental schemes and the European agricultural landscapes:the role of indicators as valuing tools for evaluation[J]. Landscape Ecology,2000,15(3):271-280. doi: 10.1023/A:1008155229725

    [32]

    BERG A,VLEK C. The influence of planned-change context on the evaluation of natural landscapes[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning,1998,43(1-3):1-10.

    [33]

    GULINCK H,MUGICA M,LUCIO J V,et al. A framework for comparative landscape analysis and evaluation based on land cover data,with an application in the Madrid region (Spain)[J]. Landscape and Urban Plan,2001,55(4):257-270. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00159-1

    [34] 谢花林,刘黎明. 乡村景观评价研究进展及其指标体系初探[J]. 生态学杂志,2003(6):97-101. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4890.2003.06.019
    [35]

    United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Word heritage convention: cultural landscapes[EB/OL]. (2020-06-06)[2022-10-25]. https://whc.unesco.org/en/culturallandscape/.

    [36]

    RAPOPORT A. On cultural landscapes[J]. Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review,1992,3:33-47.

    [37]

    WILLIAMS A,KITCHEN P,DEMIGLIO L,et al. Sense of place in Hamilton,Ontario:empirical results of a neighborhood-based survey[J]. Urban Geography,2010,31(7):905-931. doi: 10.2747/0272-3638.31.7.905

    [38]

    JORGENSEN B S,STEDMAN R C. Sense of place as an attitude:lakeshore owners attitudes toward their properties[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology,2001,21(3):233-248. doi: 10.1006/jevp.2001.0226

    [39] 方德敏,杨钊. 自然观光地旅游企业主移民地方感研究−以九寨沟为例[J]. 云南地理环境研究,2017(5):28-37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7852.2017.05.005
    [40] 张军以,周奉,王腊春. 乡村旅游视野下乡土景观的界定、保护与发展问题辨析[J]. 资源开发与市场,2018,34(10):1462-1465. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8141.2018.10.022
    [41]

    CHRISTOU P,FARMAKI A,EVANGELOU G. Nurturing nostalgia?:a response from rural tourism stakeholders[J]. Tourism Management,2018,69:42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.05.010

    [42] 王云才,石忆邵,陈田. 传统地域文化景观研究进展与展望[J]. 同济大学学报(社会科学版),2009,20(1):18-24,51. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3060.2009.01.004
    [43] 周雯佳,蔡君,郭娜. 遗产旅游目的地风土记忆研究−以福建省武夷山为例[J]. 资源开发与市场,2020,36(8):903-908. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8141.2020.08.015
    [44]

    FATIMAH T. The impacts of rural tourism initiatives on cultural landscape sustainability in Borobudur area[J]. Procedia Environmental Sciences,2015,28:567-577. doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2015.07.067

    [45]

    PROSHANSKY H M,FABIAN A K,KAMINOFF R. Place-identity:physical world socialization of the self[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology,1983,3(1):57-83. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(83)80021-8

    [46]

    BREAKWELL G M. Processes of self-evaluation: efficacy and estrangement[J]. Surrey University Press in Association with Academic Press, 1992.

    [47]

    PRITCHARD M P,HAVITZ M E,Howard D R. Analyzing the commitment-loyalty link in service contexts[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,1999,27(3):333. doi: 10.1177/0092070399273004

    [48]

    KYLE G,BRICKER K,GRAEFE A,et al. An examination of recreationists' relationships with activities and settings[J]. Leisure Sciences,2004,26(2):123-142. doi: 10.1080/01490400490432019

    [49] 耿藤瑜,傅红,曾雅婕,等. 森林康养游憩者场所感知与健康效益评估关系研究−以成都龙泉山城市森林公园为例[J]. 林业经济,2021,43(3):21-36.
    [50]

    WILLIAMS A,KITCHEN P,RANDALL J,et al. Changes in quality of life perceptions in Saskatoon,Saskatchewan:comparing survey results from 2001 and 2004[J]. Social Indicators Research,2008,85(1):5-21.

    [51] 王泓砚,谢彦君,王俊亮. 游客地方感认知图式的表征与结构[J]. 旅游学刊,2019,34(10):32-46. doi: 10.19765/j.cnki.1002-5006.2019.10.008
    [52]

    RAYMOND C M,BROWN G,WEBER D. The measurement of place attachment:personal,community,and environmental connections[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology,2010,30(4):422-434. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.08.002

    [53]

    ROJEK C, URRY J. Touring cultures: the transformations of travel and theory[M]. London and New York: Routledge, 1997.

    [54] 梁逍遥,文谨. 流动性视角下乡村旅游地游客地方感差异分析[J]. 资源开发与市场,2021,37(1):93-100. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8141.2021.01.015
    [55] 彭兆荣. 找回老家:乡土社会之家园景观[J]. 贵州社会科学,2018(2):24-30. doi: 10.13713/j.cnki.cssci.2018.02.004
    [56]

    KAUFMANN V. Re-thinking mobility: contemporary sociology[M]. London and New York: Routledge, 2017.

  • 期刊类型引用(1)

    1. 严敏,陈晨,张泉. 徽州村落空间景观特征要素对游客场所依恋感知的影响. 中国城市林业. 2025(01): 46-54 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(7)

图(1)  /  表(5)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  546
  • HTML全文浏览量:  118
  • PDF下载量:  36
  • 被引次数: 8
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-09-14
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-11-23
  • 发布日期:  2022-12-29

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回