Public Opinion on the Ecological Hotspot Event of Elephants' Northward Movement in Yunnan Province
-
摘要: 挖掘媒体报道和网民对于云南大象北移事件的态度倾向和主要观点,探索网民或社会公众保护野生动物的法律意识和科普教育的程度,通过研究发现适合引导野生动物保护舆情的网络平台。以云南大象北移事件网络舆情为对象,利用数据获取工具,采用情感分析、聚类分析和社会网络分析,分析舆论发展状况。研究发现网络舆情数据主要聚集于哔哩哔哩、新闻媒体和微信3个平台,可作为未来舆情引导的主要平台;《生物多样性公约》缔约方大会第十五次会议的召开使舆情情感出现反转,对舆情的引导发挥了重要作用;公众野生动物保护法律意识薄弱,政府相关部门科普教育力度不足;野生动物保护舆情网络传播能力有待加强。基于研究结果,对野生动物保护和舆情引导提出建议。Abstract: This paper excavates the attitude tendency and main views of media reports and netizens on the event of elephants' northward movement in Yunnan Province, explores the legal awareness of wildlife protection and the degree of popular science education of netizens or the public, in order to find a network platform suitable for public opinion guidance of wildlife protection. The public opinion on the event of elephants' northward movement in Yunnan Province is taken as the research object. Research data acquired through data crawling tool and the public opinion are analyzed from the perspectives of emotion analysis, cluster analysis and social network analysis, in order to explore the development of public opinion.The research results show that online public opinion data are mainly gathered on three platforms, which can be used as the main platform for public opinion guidance in the future. The convening of the COP15 conference reversed public opinion and played an important role in guiding public opinion. The public's awareness of wildlife protection laws is weakand efforts of relevant government departments are insufficient in science popularization education; therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the network communication capacity of public opinion on wildlife protection. Based on the research results, we put forward suggestions on wildlife protection and public opinion guidance.
-
表 1 社交媒体评论情感值
关键词大类 数值 正向情感均值 6.27 正向情感总值 1661.55 正向评论总量 265.00 中性评论总量 33.00 负向情感均值 −3.37 负向情感总值 −47459.71 负向评论总量 14 083.00 表 2 社交媒体评论情感值
关键词大类 数值 正向情感均值 14.66 正向情感总值 30082.32 正向评论总量 2052.00 中性评论总量 24.00 负向情感均值 −3.20 负向情感总值 −1254.40 负向评论总量 392.00 -
[1] 中国互联网络信息中心. CNNIC发布第49次《中国互联网络发展状况统计报告》[EB/OL]. [2022-12-22]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=rNTUGOLzFSH-4_ZAjOO51QOHLfgSGLAf1ayyH9DJSgVJOERZCbi2jR5BKwO5evW9osgVne5lfa89o8pCUsLfMFZvYpEayhhjKUF_7J46KIB2PtUrHuriWzPBW2Pba7bC&uniplatform=NZKPT. [2] 曹松. 远足的大象们还好吗:云南野生亚洲象保护状况调查[N]. 经济日报,2021-07-13(9). [3] 宋俊锋,李云雯,张名章. 从多元视镜到立体棱镜:全媒体环境下的多元立体传播策略分析:以云南象群北迁事件为例[J]. 昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版),2022,22(3):152-160. [4] 王科,夏睿. 情感词典自动构建方法综述[J]. 自动化学报,2016,42(4):495-511. [5] 孙红,俞卫国. 改进LDA模型的短文本聚类方法[J]. 软件导刊,2021,20(9):1-6. [6] 吴夙慧,成颖,郑彦宁,等. K-means算法研究综述[J]. 现代图书情报技术,2011(5):28-35. [7] 蒋盛益,李霞. 一种改进的BIRCH聚类算法[J]. 计算机应用,2009,29(1):293-296. [8] 李帅,吴斌,杜修明,等. 基于Spark的BIRCH算法并行化的设计与实现[J]. 计算机工程与科学,2017,39(1):35-41. [9] 王旭,孙瑞英. 基于SNA的突发事件网络舆情传播研究:以“魏则西事件”为例[J]. 情报科学,2017,35(3):87-92. [10] 刘军. 社会网络分析导论[M]. 北京:社会科学文献出版社,2004:4,114,128,269. [11] 强韶华,吴鹏. 突发事件网络舆情演变过程中网民群体行为仿真研究[J]. 现代图书情报技术,2014,30(6):71-78. [12] 刘军. 整体网分析讲义 :UCINET软件实用指南[M]. 上海:格致出版社,上海人民出版社,2009:11,105,289. [13] 林聚任. 社会网络分析:理论、方法与应用[M]. 北京:北京师范大学出版社,2009:93,109. [14] 平亮,宗利永. 基于社会网络中心性分析的微博信息传播研究:以Sina微博为例[J]. 图书情报知识,2010(6):92-97. -
期刊类型引用(0)
其他类型引用(1)