Evolution and Integration of Green Technology Economy and Forestry Economy: Based on Main Path Analysis
-
摘要:
绿色技术经济和林业经济两个领域随着融合发展，研究界限日益模糊，尤其是在生物能源、环境保护和社会经济等方面交叉点日益增多，导致学者难以正确判定这两个领域的独立性和相互关系。为探究两个领域的演化与融合，在Web of Science核心合集数据库进行检索，分别选取绿色技术经济领域文献12 710篇、林业经济领域文献22 990篇进行文献计量分析。通过CiteSpace软件对绿色技术经济领域、林业经济领域进行知识图谱分析，使用Pajek软件对两个领域的演化及融合进行主路径分析。研究结果表明，绿色技术经济领域和林业经济领域研究成果总体上呈逐年增加趋势；绿色技术经济、林业经济研究的演化主要经历了萌芽、探索、发展三个阶段；两者的融合发展体现在碳储存和生物质能源、以森林为基础的生物经济、林业生产中的循环经济三个方面。
-
关键词:
- 绿色技术经济 /
- 林业经济 /
- key-route主路径分析 /
- 知识图谱分析
Abstract:The research boundaries between green technology economy and forestry economy are blurring as the integration and development of the two researches, especially in some fields such as biological energy, environmental protection, and social economy. However, this integration makes it difficult for scholars to accurately judge the independence and interrelationship of these two fields. In order to explore the evolution and integration of the two fields,
12710 literatures in the field of green technology economy and22990 literatures in the field of forestry economy were selected based on Web of Science core collection database for analysis. CiteSpace software was used to analyze the knowledge map of green technology economy and forestry economy, and Pajek software was used to analyze the main path of these two fields and their integration. The results show that the research findings of the green technology economy and the forestry economy fields are growing every year; the two fields have gone through embryonic, exploratory and development stages; the integration of the two fields displays can be reflected from three aspects, i.e. carbon storage and biomass energy, forest-based biological economy, and recycling economy in forestry production. -
表 1 2003—2022年在绿色技术经济领域和林业经济领域发文量排名前5的国家
领域 国家 发文量/篇 突增性 中心性 绿色技术经济 中国 2 559 0.02 美国 1 625 69.89 0.39 印度 710 0.05 英国 573 0.13 德国 512 3.74 0.11 林业经济 美国 5 855 0.26 加拿大 2 135 91.7 0.37 中国 1 855 0.06 德国 1 525 0.14 芬兰 1 055 0.22 注：软件默认计算排名前25个国家的突增性。 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 绿色技术经济领域和林业经济领域主要突现关键词的演变情况
领域 关键词 突现度/% 开始年度 结束年度 绿色技
术经济agricultural biotechnology
（农业生物技术）15.84 2003 2010 biotechnology
（生物技术）99.33 2003 2018 life cycle assessment
（生命周期评估）38.41 2013 2020 circular economy
（循环经济）14.65 2019 2022 林业经济 ecology（生态学） 71.33 2003 2012 carbon stocks（碳储存） 55.20 2013 2018 tropical forests
（热带森林）29.93 2019 2020 drought（干旱） 25.42 2019 2022
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 重合文献中SPLC排名前10的文献节点信息
第一作者 题目 期刊 Kunttu J Exploring 2040: global trends and international policies setting frames for the finnish wood-based economy Sustainability Ferreira I Sustainable production of ectomycorrhizal fungi in the Mediterranean region to support the European Green Deal Plants People Planet Braghiroli F L Valorization of biomass residues from forest operations and wood manufacturing presents a wide range of sustainable and innovative possibilities Current Forestry Reports Piplani M Towards a global framework for analysing the forest-based bioeconomy Forests Tavoni M Forestry and the carbon market response to stabilize climate Energy Policy Lovric M Mapping forest-based bioeconomy research in Europe Forest Policy and Economics Paletto A Measuring and assessing forest-based circular bioeconomy to implement the National Sustainable Development Strategy in Italy Austrian Journal of Forest Science Capitani C From local scenarios to national maps: a participatory framework for envisioning the future of Tanzania Ecology and Society Seguin A How could forest trees play an important role as feedstock for bioenergy production Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability Duchesne L C The bioeconomy and the forestry sector: changing markets and new opportunities Forestry Chronicle
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] BASCOM W. African material culture,technology,and ecological adaptation[J]. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,2006,96(2):581-589.
[2] SHARMA M M. Science and dividends in the practice of green technology:cleaner and greener is smarter[J]. Clean Products and Processes,2001,3(1):2-3. doi: 10.1007/s100980000095
[3] FUSSLER C,JAMES P. Driving eco-innovation:a breakthrough discipline for innovation and sustainability [M]. London,Washington DC:Pitman Publishing,1996.
[4] HORBACH J,RAMMER C,RENNINGS K. Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact:the role of regulatory push/pull,technology push and market pull[J]. Ecological Economics,2012,78:112-122.
[5] DAI L H,MU X R,LEE C C,et al. The impact of outward foreign direct investment on green innovation:the threshold effect of environmental regulation[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2021,28:34868-34884. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12930-w
[6] 姚华. 论中国的绿色发展与林业经济策略[J]. 改革与开放,2016(13):1-4. doi: 10.16653/j.cnki.32-1034/f.2016.13.001 [7] FAUSTMANN M. Calculation of the value which forest land and immature stands possess for forestry[J]. Allgemeine Forstund Jagdzeitung,1849,15:441-455.
[8] OHLIN B. Till frågan om skogarnas omloppstid[J]. Ekonomisk Tidskrift,1921,23(12):89-113. doi: 10.2307/3472369
[9] MOREIRA J M,RODRIGUEZ L C E,CAIXETA-FILHO J V. An optimization model to integrate forest plantations and connecting corridors[J]. Forest Science,2013,59(6):661-669. doi: 10.5849/forsci.12-051
[10] OLLIKAINEN M. Forestry in bioeconomy–smart green growth for the humankind[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research,2014,29(4):360-366. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2014.926392
[11] ANTIKAINEN R,DALHAMMAR C,HILDÉN M,et al. Renewal of forest based manufacturing towards a sustainable circular bioeconomy [R]. Helsinki,Finland:Environment Institute,2017.
[12] 刘懿,周丽英. 主路径分析方法研究进展[J]. 数字图书馆论坛,2019,185(10):8-15. doi: 10.3772/j.issn.1673-2286.2019.10.002 [13] KLEINBERG J. Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams[C]//KDD '02: proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2002:91-101.
[14] CHEN L,XU S,ZHU L J,et al. A semantic main path analysis method to identify multiple developmental trajectories[J]. Journal of Informetrics,2022,16(2):101281. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2022.101281
[15] XU S,HAO L Y,AN X,et al. Review on emerging research topics with key-route main path analysis[J]. Scientometrics,2020,122(1):607-624. doi: 10.1007/s11192-019-03288-5
[16] 庄诗梦,王东波. 深度学习领域研究热点与前沿分析:基于CiteSpace的信息可视化分析[J]. 河北科技图苑,2018,31(1):73-82. [17] 徐坚,王维平. 我国人工智能教育发展及现状研究:基于1976—2017年中文文献的CiteSpace可视化分析[J]. 信息化研究,2017,43(6):1-6. [18] POPP D. Lessons from patents:using patents to measure technological change in environmental models[J]. Ecological Economics,2005,54:209-226.
[19] GILLI M,MANCINELLI S,MAZZANTI M. Innovation complementarity and environmental productivity effects:reality or delusion? evidence from the EU[J]. Ecological Economics,2014,103:56-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.004
[20] MIAO C L,FANG D B,SUN L Y,et al. Natural resources utilization efficiency under the influence of green technological innovation[J]. Resources,Conservation and Recycling,2017,126:153-161.
[21] DU K,LI J. Towards a green world:how do green technology innovations affect total-factor carbon productivity[J]. Energy Policy,2019,131:240-250. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.04.033
[22] XU S R,WU T,ZHANG Y. The spatial-temporal variation and convergence of green innovation efficiency in the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2020,27(21):26868-26881. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08865-3
[23] JIN W,ZHANG H Q,LIU S S,et al. Technological innovation,environmental regulation,and green total factor efficiency of industrial water resources[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2019,211:61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.172
[24] MEIRUN T,MIHARDJO L W W,HASEEB M,et al. The dynamics effect of green technology innovation on economic growth and CO2 emission in Singapore:new evidence from bootstrap ARDL approach[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2021,28(4):4184-4194. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10760-w
[25] XIN L G,AHMAD M,KHATTAK S I. Impact of innovation in marine energy generation,distribution,or transmission-related technologies on carbon dioxide emissions in the United States[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2022,159:112225. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112225
[26] MIHAYO I Z,KOMBE G G. Do renewable energies contribute to enhancing environmental quality in Eastern Africa?[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2022,29(59):89093-89107. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22002-2
[27] AGHABALAYEV F,AHMAD M. Does innovation in ocean energy generations-related technologies in G7 countries reduce carbon dioxide emissions? role of international collaboration in green technology development and commercial and monetary policies[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2023,30(6):14545-14564.
[28] XIN D L,AHMAD M,KHATTAK S I. Impact of innovation in climate change mitigation technologies related to chemical industry on carbon dioxide emissions in the United States[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2022,379:134746. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134746
[29] RAMETSTEINER E,SIMULA M. Forest certification:an instrument to promote sustainable forest management?[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2003,67(1):87-98. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4797(02)00191-3
[30] SEIDL R,RAMMER W,JӒGER D,et al. Assessing trade-offs between carbon sequestration and timber production within a framework of multi-purpose forestry in Austria[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2007,248(1):64-79.
[31] LEXER M J,SEIDL R. Addressing biodiversity in a stakeholder-driven climate change vulnerability assessment of forest management[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2009,258:S158-S167. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.07.011
[32] WOLFSLEHNER B,SEIDL R. Harnessing ecosystem models and multi-criteria decision analysis for the support of forest management[J]. Environmental Management,2010,46(6):850-861. doi: 10.1007/s00267-009-9414-5
[33] SEIDL R,RAMMER W,LEXER M J. Climate change vulnerability of sustainable forest management in the Eastern Alps[J]. Climatic Change,2011,106(2):225-254. doi: 10.1007/s10584-010-9899-1
[34] SEIDL R,RAMMER W,LEXER M J. Adaptation options to reduce climate change vulnerability of sustainable forest management in the Austrian Alps[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research,2011,41(4):694-706. doi: 10.1139/x10-235
[35] SEIDL R,SCHELHAAS M J,LEXER M J. Unraveling the drivers of intensifying forest disturbance regimes in Europe[J]. Global Change Biology,2011,17(9):2842-2852. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02452.x
[36] KOLSTRÖM M,LINDNER M,VILÉN T,et al. Reviewing the science and implementation of climate change adaptation measures in European forestry[J]. Forests,2011,2(4):961-982. doi: 10.3390/f2040961
[37] SEIDL R,LEXER M J. Forest management under climatic and social uncertainty:trade-offs between reducing climate change impacts and fostering adaptive capacity[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2013,114:461-469. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.09.028
[38] AMMER C,FICHTNER A,FISCHER A,et al. Key ecological research questions for Central European forests[J]. Basic and Applied Ecology,2018,32:3-25. doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2018.07.006
[39] PENONE C,ALLAN E,SOLIVERES S,et al. Specialisation and diversity of multiple trophic groups are promoted by different forest features[J]. Ecology Letters,2019,22(1):170-180. doi: 10.1111/ele.13182
[40] GUSTAFSSON L,BAUHUS J,ASBECK T,et al. Retention as an integrated biodiversity conservation approach for continuous-cover forestry in Europe[J]. Ambio,2020,49(1):85-97. doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01190-1
[41] TAVONI M,SOHNGEN B,BOSETTI V. Forestry and the carbon market response to stabilize climate[J]. Energy Policy,2007,35(11):5346-5353. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.01.036
[42] BRAGHIROLI F L,PASSARINI L. Valorization of biomass residues from forest operations and wood manufacturing presents a wide range of sustainable and innovative possibilities[J]. Current Forestry Reports,2020,6(2):172-183. doi: 10.1007/s40725-020-00112-9
[43] PIPLANI M,SMITH-HALL C. Towards a global framework for analysing the forest-based bioeconomy[J]. Forests,2021,12(12):1673.
[44] FERREIRA I,CORRÊA A,CRUZ C. Sustainable production of ectomycorrhizal fungi in the Mediterranean region to support the European Green Deal[J]. Plants People Planet,2023,5(1):14-26. doi: 10.1002/ppp3.10265
[45] KUNTTU J,WALLIUS V,KULVIK M,et al. Exploring 2040:global trends and international policies setting frames for the finnish wood-based economy[J]. Sustainability,2022,14(16):9999. doi: 10.3390/su14169999
计量
- 文章访问数: 171
- HTML全文浏览量: 76
- PDF下载量: 51
