高级检索

生态文明概念之辨:“形态说”“要素说”抑或“战略说”

The Discrimination of the Concept of Ecological Civilization: "Morphology Theory", "Element Theory" or "Strategy Theory"

  • 摘要: 对生态文明进行概念界定,当前主要存在“形态说”与“要素说”之争,前者把生态文明看作一种独立的新型文明形态,后者把生态文明当作任何文明形态中的构成要素。重提这一学术争论,发现“形态说”存在着如何看待现时代工业文明“生态 + ”的发展态势以及如何理解官方相关表述等疑问,也发现“要素说”存在着泛化生态文明概念、削弱唯物史观基础等倾向。基于此,从战略哲学的角度,结合我国生态文明建设的总体布局提出了一种“战略说”,即认为生态文明就是我国在特定的时代条件下为应对人类生态危机问题而提出的一种旨在逐步推进人与自然和谐共生的政治战略。这对于弥补“形态说”与“要素说”的不足并科学把握习近平生态文明思想具有重要意义。

     

    Abstract: To define the concept of ecological civilization, there is a dispute between "Morphology Theory" and "Element Theory". The former regards ecological civilization as an independent new type of civilization, while the latter regards ecological civilization as a constituent element of any civilization. Recalling this academic debate, we find that there are still some unresolved problems in the "Morphology Theory", such as how to view the development trend of the "ecology +" of modern industrial civilization and how to understand the relevant official statements . It is also found that there is a tendency to generalize the concept of ecological civilization and weaken the basis of historical materialism in the "Element Theory". Based on this, from the perspective of strategic philosophy and combined with the overall layout of China's ecological civilization construction, a "strategic theory" is proposed, which holds that ecological civilization is a political strategy proposed by China under specific historical conditions to cope with the human ecological crisis and aiming to gradually promote the harmonious coexistence of man and nature. It is of great significance to make up for some deficiencies of the "Morphology Theory" and "Element Theory" and to scientifically grasp the concept of Xi Jinping's Thought on Ecological Civilization.

     

/

返回文章
返回