高级检索

全民所有自然资源损害赔偿的概念界定、关系对照与制度设计

Compensation for Natural Resources Damage under Public Ownership: Concept Clarification, Relationship Comparison and System Design

  • 摘要: 目前我国全民所有自然资源损害赔偿制度存在适用法律混乱、索赔主体不明确、救济客体不清晰等问题,导致实践中出现自然资源经济、生态价值混同救济,相关主体怠于索赔等现象。通过对现有相关制度的对比和关系梳理,提出构建以自然资源国家所有权和环境公共利益为诉权基础的新型全民所有自然资源损害赔偿诉讼机制。在赔偿主体方面,应建立专门的自然资源资产管理部门负责行使自然资源所有权;在赔偿磋商机制的构建上,应兼顾社会公众的监督权和知情权,使公众能够有序参与全民所有自然资源保护程序;在举证责任上,应综合考虑案件证据的绝对优势、距离证据远近等因素,采取举证责任推定的证明责任;赔偿范围应包括自然资源的经济利益、生态利益和社会利益三方面。同时,还应加强与环境侵权诉讼、公益诉讼的衔接,以此实现我国自然资源损害经济、生态等多元价值一体化的法律救济。

     

    Abstract: China's current compensation system for natural resources damage under public ownership faces severe challenges, including legal application inconsistencies, ambiguous claimant identification, and ill-defined relief objects, leading to conflated economic-ecological valuations and claimant passivity in practice. Through systematic comparison of existing institutional frameworks, this study proposes a novel litigation mechanism grounded in state ownership of natural resources and environmental public interest. Our key institutional innovations include: ① establishing specialized natural resources asset management authorities to exercise ownership rights; ② developing compensation negotiation mechanisms that safeguard public supervision and rights to be informed while enabling orderly public participation; ③ implementing presumption of liability rules based on evidentiary preponderance and accessibility considerations; ④ adopting a comprehensive compensation scope encompassing economic, ecological, and social benefits of natural resources. The proposed system emphasizes coordination with environmental tort litigation and public interest litigation, aiming to achieve integrated legal relief for natural resources' multidimensional values.

     

/

返回文章
返回