高级检索

高质量发展背景下生态产品价值实现机制评价研究

Research on the Evaluation of Ecological Product Value Realization Mechanisms in the Context of High-Quality Development

  • 摘要: 完善生态产品价值实现机制是推动经济高质量发展的内在要求。基于生态产品价值实现机制的内在逻辑,构建生态产品价值实现机制评价指标体系,运用熵权TOPSIS法对32个城市(州、县)的机制进行评估。研究发现:① 32个市(州、县)的生态产品价值实现机制建设处于中等水平,政策保障机制执行力相对薄弱;区域发展差异明显,最优的三明市(0.735)与末位的唐山市(0.255)相差2.88倍。②高接近度城市通过市场化驱动与政策保障形成良性互动,但供给优化能力不足,仅53.85%的地区达到“良好”水平;低接近度城市生态资源基础良好,但市场化效能与执行力相对滞后,分别有84.21%和68.42%的地区未达到“良好”的标准。③路径组合分化显著。综合路径相对接近度最高(0.634),交易驱动单一路径次之(0.555),远高于末位的产业开发路径(0.316)。建议通过构建分类分级的政策支持体系、市场化双轮驱动和区域协同优化等机制,推动生态产品价值实现机制与高质量发展深度融合。

     

    Abstract: Improving the value realization mechanism of ecological products is an intrinsic requirement for promoting high-quality economic development. Based on the internal logic of constructing ecological product value realization mechanism, this study establishes an evaluation index system and employs the entropy-weighted TOPSIS method to assessthe implementation across 32 cities (states and counties). The findings reveal three key insights: (1) The development of the ecological product value realization mechanism across the 32 cities (prefectures, counties) is at a medium level, with policy guarantee mechanisms exhibiting relatively weak execution capabilities. Regional development disparities are significant, with the highest-performing Sanming City (0.735) outperforming the lowest-ranked Tangshan City (0.255) by a factor of 2.88.(2) High-proximity cities achieve positive interactions between market-driven forces and policy guarantees, yet suffer from insufficient supply optimization capabilities, with only 53.85% reaching "good" performance levels. Low-proximity cities possess favorable ecological resource foundations, but lag in market efficiency and execution capacity, with 84.21% and 68.42% respectively failing to meet "good" standards. (3) Pathway combinations show significant differentiation. The integrated path exhibits the hightest relative proximity(0.634), followed by the transaction-driven singular pathway (0.555), both substantially outperforming the lowest-ranked industrial development pathway (0.316).The study recommends promoting the deep integration of ecological product value realization mechanisms with high-quality development through the construction of a classified and hierarchical policy support system, market-oriented dual-wheel drive mechanisms, and regional collaborative optimization strategies.

     

/

返回文章
返回