高级检索

危机的宿命:生态社会主义抑或“去增长共产主义”?以福斯特、斋藤幸平为中心的考察

The Destiny of Crisis: Eco-Socialism or “Degrowth Communism”? — An Examination Centered on Foster and Kohei Saito

  • 摘要: 如何超越资本主义、摆脱“人类世”气候危机,是西方生态学马克思主义的理论归旨。当代著名生态学马克思主义者约翰·贝拉米·福斯特、斋藤幸平将资本主义扩张积累的生产方式视为生态危机的“原罪”,在对技术乐观主义、生态帝国主义以及去增长资本主义的生态批判基础上,分别擘画了生态社会主义、“去增长共产主义”作为替代资本主义、纾解“人类世”气候危机的两种理想方案。福斯特、斋藤幸平两位学者对资本主义反生态性的批判以及对未来理想社会的建构,对省思现代工业文明的进路与出路具有借鉴意义。当然,两位学者的理论也存在革命性不足、曲解马克思主义等局限。

     

    Abstract: How to transcend capitalism and escape the climate crisis of the "Anthropocene" is the theoretical aim of Western ecological Marxism. Prominent contemporary ecological Marxists, John Bellamy Foster and Kohei Saito, regard the capitalist mode of production—driven by expansion and accumulation—as the "original sin" of the ecological crisis. Based on their critiques of technological optimism, ecological imperialism, and degrowth capitalism, they have respectively outlined two ideal alternatives to capitalism: eco-socialism and "degrowth communism", aiming to address the climate crisis of the Anthropocene. The critiques of capitalism's anti-ecological nature and the visions for an ideal future society proposed by Foster and Kohei Saito offer valuable insights for reflecting on the path and future of modern industrial civilization. However, their theories also have limitations, such as insufficient revolutionary potential and potential misinterpretations of Marxism.

     

/

返回文章
返回