高级检索

北京市香山公园和鹫峰森林公园游憩承载力对比研究

肖随丽, 贾黎明, 杜建军, 唐殿珂, 汪平, 李江婧

肖随丽, 贾黎明, 杜建军, 唐殿珂, 汪平, 李江婧. 北京市香山公园和鹫峰森林公园游憩承载力对比研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版), 2010, 9(4): 38-43.
引用本文: 肖随丽, 贾黎明, 杜建军, 唐殿珂, 汪平, 李江婧. 北京市香山公园和鹫峰森林公园游憩承载力对比研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版), 2010, 9(4): 38-43.
A Comparison of Recreation Carrying Capacity between Fragrant Hills Park and Jiufeng Forest Park[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2010, 9(4): 38-43.
Citation: A Comparison of Recreation Carrying Capacity between Fragrant Hills Park and Jiufeng Forest Park[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2010, 9(4): 38-43.

北京市香山公园和鹫峰森林公园游憩承载力对比研究

A Comparison of Recreation Carrying Capacity between Fragrant Hills Park and Jiufeng Forest Park

  • 摘要: 为实现 “宜居城市”的战略目标,北京市山区森林需要在保护生态环境的同时满足市民的森林游憩需求。选择香山公园和鹫峰国家森林公园进行了游憩承载力的对比研究。在2008、2009年问卷调查和实地踏查的基础上,定量计算与定性分析相结合,对两个景区的空间、生态、设施和社会承载力以及整体承载水平进行了综合评价。结果表明:香山的合理空间容量为13 000 人次/日和4 745 000人次/年。在空间和设施方面香山为适载或超载(高峰期),生态和社会承载水平为超载,整体承载水平已接近饱和。鹫峰的合理空间容量为12 350人次/日和4 507 750人次/年,鹫峰森林公园除设施为适载状态外,其他3个方面均为弱载。建议打造大西山风景游憩区,加大鹫峰等森林公园的建设力度和宣传力度,引导市民前往这些相对弱载但很有特点的游憩地休闲游憩,以缓解香山等游憩地的压力。
    Abstract: To achieve the strategic goal of livable city, mountain forests in Beijing should not only protect the environment but also meet citizens demand of forest recreation. Fragrant Hills Park and Jiufeng Forest Park are selected to conduct a comparison research on recreational carrying capacity. Based on the questionnaire and on the spot investigation in 2008 and 2009, the authors evaluate spatial carrying capacity, ecological carrying capacity, facility carrying capacity, social carrying capacity and overall recreational carrying capacity of the two scenic spots combining quantitative analysis with qualitative analysis. Research results show that reasonable spatial carrying capacity of Fragrant Hills Park is 13 000 tourists per day, 4 745 000 tourists per year, Jiufeng Forest Park is 12 350 tourists per day, 4 507 750 tourists per year. On the aspects of space, facility, ecology and society, the actual amount of tourist have been beyond the reasonable capacity on peak days. The total recreational carrying capacity of Fragrant Hills Park is close to saturation. From aspects of space, ecology and society of Jiufeng Forest Park, the actual amount of tourists are lower than reasonable carrying capacity, while for facility is reasonable. The authors suggest that the whole Xishan scenic spot should be built, citizens should be guided to the recreational forest with characteristics which is not up to saturation to relieve the pressure of Fragrant Hills Park.
  • 期刊类型引用(10)

    1. 牛莉芹,王紫彦,王垚垚,王峥,程占红. 基于旅游干扰的历山自然保护区游径附近森林群落生态环境承载力. 自然资源学报. 2023(04): 995-1009 . 百度学术
    2. 郭茹,胡一可,王洪成. 游憩服务视角下的绿色空间研究现状与展望. 中国城市林业. 2023(02): 152-159 . 百度学术
    3. 方雅淳,陈鹤立. 基于AHP-模糊综合评价法的马鞍山森林公园游憩度评价. 湖南农业科学. 2020(04): 47-50 . 百度学术
    4. 景永才,孙然好,陈利顶. 基于大数据的北京市公园休憩服务供需平衡研究. 环境生态学. 2020(05): 20-26 . 百度学术
    5. 李博浩,曹智,张国梁,周春草,李德立. 基于成分法的黑龙江冰雪旅游生态足迹研究——以雪乡为例. 中国林业经济. 2019(04): 112-118 . 百度学术
    6. ZHANG Ying,PAN Jing,CHEN Ke. Touristic Ecological Footprint of Jiufeng National Forest Park in Beijing Based on Component Method. Journal of Landscape Research. 2017(05): 47-52 . 必应学术
    7. 林丽丽,董建文,刘兴诏,黄柳菁,林日,王齐,张增可. 森林公园生态系统服务功能评估综述. 林业资源管理. 2017(01): 19-26 . 百度学术
    8. 张颖,潘静,陈珂. 基于成分法的北京鹫峰国家森林公园旅游生态足迹研究. 中南林业科技大学学报. 2017(02): 115-121 . 百度学术
    9. 成程,肖燚,饶恩明. 北京香山公园自然景观价值二十年变迁. 生态学报. 2014(20): 6020-6027 . 百度学术
    10. 王然,张丽云,徐宁,蔡湛,傅学庆. 木兰围场国家森林公园生态旅游规划. 湖北农业科学. 2013(11): 2687-2691 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(14)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  2242
  • HTML全文浏览量:  51
  • PDF下载量:  7
  • 被引次数: 24
出版历程
  • 发布日期:  2010-11-29

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回