Advanced search
LU Fang, ZHOU Xun-fang, ZHU Jiang. Practice and Improvement of Administrative Discretion Standard in Forestry Administrative Punishment[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2016, 15(4): 38-45. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2016009
Citation: LU Fang, ZHOU Xun-fang, ZHU Jiang. Practice and Improvement of Administrative Discretion Standard in Forestry Administrative Punishment[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2016, 15(4): 38-45. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2016009

Practice and Improvement of Administrative Discretion Standard in Forestry Administrative Punishment

More Information
  • Published Date: December 30, 2016
  • Administrative discretion standard is internal self-restraint rules in an administrative organization, which is expected for effectively controlling the abuse of administrative power. Introduction of the administrative discretion standard system into forestry administrative punishment will be conducive to unify the discretion scale and improve the level of forestry administrative punishment. In recent years, the rich experience for the construction of forestry administrative discretion standard system has been accumulated from the local practice of formulating the discretion standard of forestry administrative punishment. Meanwhile, there are many differences on scope, type, lattice division, punishment range, and principle in the local standards because of multiple decision-making bodies and arbitrary standard setting. The applicable rules of discretion standard and decision-making bodies of specific discretion standards should be clearly distinguished. Moreover, the applicable rules of forestry administrative discretion standard and an unified standard should be set for whole China by the bureau of forestry administration in State Council, and then the local discretion standards should be modified accordingly by provincial forestry departments, therefore, China's forestry administrative discretion standard system may be improved.
  • Related Articles

    [1]Wang Feng, Zhang Decheng, Chen Yongzhe. The Cultural Mission of China's National Parks[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2024, 23(4): 102-108. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2023205
    [2]Zhou Guowen, Geng Jiangyan, Wu Dan. The Natural Values Connotation and Ethical Principles of National Parks from the Perspective of Ecological Civilization[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2024, 23(3): 122-129. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2023185
    [3]Zhang Lei, Wang Chengfeng, Xing Rui. Attributes, Functions and Paths of Ecological Civilization Education of National Parks[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2023, 22(4): 61-65. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2023195
    [4]PENG Jian. Discussion on the Necessity and Pathway of Appropriate Development of Tourism in National Parks of China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2021, 20(2): 6-13. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2020194
    [5]ZHOU Guo-wen, SUN Ye-lin. National Parks, Environmental Ethics and Ecological Citizens[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2020, 19(3): 12-16. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2020018
    [6]PENG Jian. The Protected Area System Dominated by National Park: Connotation, Categories, and Establishment Path[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2019, 18(1): 38-44. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2018214
    [7]HE Hua-zheng, FENG Jing-lun. Several Mistakes in Construction of Ecological Civilization[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2013, 12(1): 13-17.
    [8]ChinaYAO Bei. Ecological Civilization and Value Orientation of Law Construction in China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2011, 10(4): 82-85.
    [9]JING Tao1, 2,  GAO Shu-chao2,  WU Bin. Integrated Development in Mountainous Area under the Visual Field of Ecological Civilization Construction[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2009, 8(1): 44-47.
    [10]KE Shui-fa, , ZHAO Tie-bai. Developing a Harmonic Relationship between Human and Nature for a Society with Ecological Civilization[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2009, 8(1): 39-43.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(11)

    1. 彭建,齐媛媛,张姣姣,杨婧. 社区参与视角下国家公园居民的旅游影响感知和自然保护态度差异——以神农架国家公园试点区为例. 国家公园(中英文). 2024(01): 20-30 .
    2. 赵晶晶,程盼辉. 体验经济视域下三江源国家公园生态旅游发展研究——以澜沧江园区昂赛自然保护区为例. 河北旅游职业学院学报. 2024(01): 19-25 .
    3. 王建梅,胡晓宾,于宝,李兴,王娜,解雨. 遗产活化视角下长城国家文化公园(秦皇岛段)景观营建策略研究. 河北地质大学学报. 2024(02): 117-121 .
    4. 王建梅,胡晓宾,张毅,伍敏华,雷绍宇. 地域文化视角下长城国家文化公园景观风貌修复与提升策略——以秦皇岛段为例. 现代园艺. 2024(11): 103-105 .
    5. 彭建,齐媛媛,杨遥. 国家公园旅游对当地居民自然保护态度的影响机制——以神农架国家公园试点区为例. 生态学报. 2024(17): 7461-7475 .
    6. 杨子诚,王丹彤,罗伟雄,汤永晶,杨聪,陈飞. 亚洲象国家公园候选区人象冲突缓解措施研究. 自然保护地. 2024(04): 11-19 .
    7. 于冰蕾,张卓群. 澳大利亚大堡礁海洋公园制度建设及对中国的启示——基于《大堡礁2050长期可持续发展计划》的分析. 环境保护. 2024(Z5): 87-93 .
    8. 卜诗洁,王群,卓玛措. 生态旅游发展模式演变下三江源国家公园居民生计韧性分析. 地域研究与开发. 2023(01): 132-136 .
    9. 蒋丽波. 国家公园高质量发展与旅游开发实践探索. 黑龙江生态工程职业学院学报. 2023(06): 40-42 .
    10. 程盼辉. 三江源国家公园澜沧江源园区生态体验发展路径:多方合力下的突围——以杂多县昂赛乡为例. 河北旅游职业学院学报. 2023(04): 23-30 .
    11. 刘楠,孔磊,石金莲. 户外游憩管理矩阵理论在国家公园管理中的应用及启示——以美国德纳里国家公园和保留区为例. 世界林业研究. 2022(04): 88-92 .

    Other cited types(5)

Catalog

    Article views (612) PDF downloads (111) Cited by(16)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return