Advanced search
PANG Xin-sheng, WANG Min. Comparison of International Competitiveness of National Forest Products along the “Belt and Road”[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2019, 18(4): 54-61. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2018172
Citation: PANG Xin-sheng, WANG Min. Comparison of International Competitiveness of National Forest Products along the “Belt and Road”[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2019, 18(4): 54-61. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2018172

Comparison of International Competitiveness of National Forest Products along the “Belt and Road”

More Information
  • Received Date: November 01, 2018
  • Available Online: April 24, 2019
  • Published Date: November 30, 2019
  • The distribution of forest resources in countries along the " Belt and Road”is not balanced, and the development level of forest products processing industry also varies largely. Only by referring to the actual situation of different countries, can the advantages of forest products trade within the region be complementary. In this way, an objective analysis of forest products production, trade, the status quo and pattern of nations in this region is of practical significance. Based on the database of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, this paper determines a series of international competitiveness indexes of forest products, including production elements, demand conditions, market competition, management model of forest resources, higher forestry education, etc. To avoid excessive indexes and prevent duplicate information, the indexes which are strongly correlated are ruled out. On this basis we build a comprehensive and systematic international competitiveness evaluation index system of forest products, and 27 countries are selected as research object, which either have top trade amount of forest products along the Belt and Road or trade closely and frequently with China on forest products. The combination of technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and rank sum ratio method (RSR) is used to explore the issue of forest products competitiveness in countries along the Belt and Road.
  • [1]
    赵晓迪, 赵荣. 哈萨克斯坦林业发展现状[J]. 林业科技情报,2015(3):1-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3303.2015.03.001
    [2]
    赵晓迪, 赵荣. 乌兹别克斯坦林业发展现状[J]. 世界林业研究,2016(2):91-96.
    [3]
    国家林业局国际合作司. 建立中国−中东欧国家林业合作协调机制 开启丝绸之路经济带林业西进欧洲新篇章[N]. 中国绿色时报, 2016-07-18(2).
    [4]
    李进芳. 丝绸之路经济带国家林产品贸易现状及其合作前景分析[J]. 世界农业,2017(4):75-83.
    [5]
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2015年全球森林资源评估报告案头参考[EB/OL]. [2018-07-10]. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4808c.pdf.
    [6]
    The World Bank. World development indicators[EB/OL]. [2018-07-15]. http://datatopics.worldbank.org/world-development-indicators/.
    [7]
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2010 年森林资源评估主报告[EB/OL]. [2018-07-10]. http://www.fao.org/forest-resources-assessment/past-assessments/fra-2010/zh/.
    [8]
    The World Trade Organization. Trade and tariff data[EB/OL]. [2018-07-20]. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/statis_e.htm.
    [9]
    孙振球. 医学综合评价方法及其应用[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2006: 29-35.
    [10]
    张愈伟. Topsis法结合变异系数评价某院单病种医疗质量[J]. 中国医药科学,2013,3(11):134-136.
    [11]
    吴爱雯. Topsis法对医院医疗质量管理的综合评价[J]. 中国卫生统计,2010,27(6):619-620. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-3674.2010.06.019
    [12]
    田凤调. RSR法中的分档问题[J]. 中国卫生统计,1993,10(2):26-28.
    [13]
    拉姆萨. 老挝林业资源型地区产业转型研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2015.
    [14]
    拉姆萨, 张晓梅. 老挝森林资源的保护经验与启示[J]. 区域经济,2015(10):8-9.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 陈燕凤,唐琦,夏庆杰. 中国城乡居民消费相对贫困比较研究:1995—2018. 社会治理. 2023(04): 84-101 .

    Other cited types(3)

Catalog

    Article views (1706) PDF downloads (42) Cited by(4)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return