Advanced search
LIU Bing-xin, HE Chao. Analysis of Farmers’ Preference for the Transfer of Forest Rights Based on the Selective Experiment Method[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2019, 18(4): 47-53. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2018179
Citation: LIU Bing-xin, HE Chao. Analysis of Farmers’ Preference for the Transfer of Forest Rights Based on the Selective Experiment Method[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2019, 18(4): 47-53. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2018179

Analysis of Farmers’ Preference for the Transfer of Forest Rights Based on the Selective Experiment Method

More Information
  • Received Date: November 13, 2018
  • Available Online: May 21, 2019
  • Published Date: November 30, 2019
  • This study used the selective experiment method to analyze the preference and acceptance of 478 households in 10 sample counties in Liaoning Province for different transfer rights. The results show that: the price of forestland transfer, the number of forestry supportive policies, the degree of urban and rural social security coordination, the possibility of going out to work, the difficulty of being a city-dweller, and the degree of closure of resources utilization policies have significant impacts on farmers’ preference for forestry rights transfer, of which forestland is transferred out. The impacts of price, the number of forestry supportive policies, urban and rural social security planning, and the possibility of going out to work are positive, whilst the impacts of the difficulty of settling in the city and the degree of closure of resource utilization policies are negative. The forest land area per family, forestry subsidies and total household income significantly influencing the farmers’ preference for the transfer of forest rights, of which, the impact of household forestland area on farmers’ willingness to transfer forest rights is negative, whilst the impact of forestry subsidies and total household income is positive. It is suggested that, to promote farmers’ outflow of forest rights, related supporting policies should be improved, and we must coordinate the urban and rural welfare levels to protect the basic living and welfare of farmers.
  • [1]
    李怡, 高岚, 刘一明. 我国林权流转效益分析与评价[J]. 农村经济,2016(2):44-49. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7252.2016.02.007
    [2]
    谢煜, 朱小静, 温作民, 等. 集体林权制度改革后林权交易市场的运行机制研究[J]. 农村经济,2013(12):33-37.
    [3]
    徐本鑫. 我国集体林权流转立法的模式变革与实现路径[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2013(4):102-106.
    [4]
    林丽梅, 刘振滨, 许佳贤, 等. 家庭禀赋对农户林地流转意愿及行为的影响−基于闽西北集体林区农户调查[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2016(2):16-21.
    [5]
    谢屹, 李小勇, 温亚利. 农户集体林权流转意愿及影响因素分析−基于辽宁、浙江、陕西、重庆四省(市)的调研[J]. 广东社会科学,2014(1):13-19. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-114X.2014.01.002
    [6]
    张连刚, 柯水发. 农户对林业专业合作组织满意度的影响因素实证分析[J]. 西北林学院学报,2015(1):285-292. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2015.01.49
    [7]
    董晶, 王菲菲, 陈骐, 等. 林业合作组织与林权流转意愿的因果研究[J]. 林业经济,2016(6):39-45.
    [8]
    聂影. 林权流转的多维动因分析与激励路径选择[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版),2010(4):5-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9272.2010.04.002
    [9]
    蔡志坚, 李莹, 谢煜, 等. 基于TPB模型的农户林地转出决策行为分析框架[J]. 林业经济,2012(9):8-12.
    [10]
    徐秀英, 石道金, 杨松坤, 等. 农户林地流转行为及影响因素分析−基于浙江省临安、安吉的农户调查[J]. 林业科学,2010(9):149-157.
    [11]
    续继. 林权流转的相关影响因素分析[J]. 林业经济,2015(5):14-18.
    [12]
    张健, 姜雪梅. 集体林区林权制度改革后农户林地流转的行为影响因素分析−基于福建省三明市156户农户调查[J]. 林业经济,2013(8):32-36.
    [13]
    CHAMBERLIN E H. An experimental imperfect market[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1948,56(2):95-108. doi: 10.1086/256654
    [14]
    LANCASTER K J. A new approach to consumer theory[J]. The Journal of Political Economy,1966,74(1):132-157.
    [15]
    樊辉, 赵敏娟. 自然资源非市场价值评估的选择实验法: 原理及应用分析[J]. 资源科学,2013,35(7):1347-1354.
    [16]
    谭秋成. 度量生态服务价值的选择实验: 方法介绍及案例研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(7):46-52.
    [17]
    岳浩永, 梁冬, 徐文全. 基于完善农地流转制度的农村社会保障体制创新[J]. 农村经济,2005(10):82-84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-7470.2005.10.026
    [18]
    罗必良. 农地流转的市场逻辑−" 产权强度-禀赋效应-交易装置”的分析线索及案例研究[J]. 南方经济,2014(5):1-24. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6249.2014.05.001

Catalog

    Article views (1415) PDF downloads (54) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return