The Impact of Forestry Investment on Urban Residents' Green Welfare

Yang He; Zeng Zhi; Mi Feng

doi:10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2021106

Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science) > 2022 > 21(3): 20-27. > DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2021106

Yang He, Zeng Zhi, Mi Feng. The Impact of Forestry Investment on Urban Residents' Green Welfare[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2022, 21(3): 20-27. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2021106

Citation:

PDF (651 KB)

The Impact of Forestry Investment on Urban Residents' Green Welfare

School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, 100083, P. R. China

More Information

Received Date: April 18, 2021
Available Online: January 12, 2022
Published Date: September 29, 2022

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Based on Chinese inter-provincial panel data from 2011 to 2019, this paper empirically analyzed the impact of forestry investment on urban residents' green welfare and its impact pathways with the systematic GMM model and mediating effects model from two perspectives: the sources and destinations of forestry investment. The results of the study showed that: ① The source of forestry investment is dependent on the difference of forest resource endowment in each region, and forestry social investment is more efficient than forestry financial investment. For every 1% increase in forestry financial investment and forestry social investment after the introduction of forest resource endowment, the level of green welfare increases by 10.414% and 122.42%, respectively. ② The destination of forestry investment has a significant enhancement effect on urban residents' green welfare. Among them, for every 1% increase in forestry ecological construction and protection investment, forestry support and security investment, and forestry infrastructure construction investment, the level of green welfare increases by 0.047%, 0.021%, and 0.0147%, respectively, while the impact of investment in forestry industry development on green welfare depends on the magnitude of its "positive and negative effects". ③ The study of the impact pathways found that forestry investment can enhance green welfare through the improvement of ecological environment and the growth of economy, and also avoid the loss of green welfare by reducing residents' consumption level. Therefore, the source of forestry investment should encourage the absorption of social capital, and the direction of forestry investment should actively guide the development of forestry industry, so as to enhance the green welfare of urban residents more effectively from both the source and the end.
- forestry investment sources,
- forestry investment destination,
- urban residents' green welfare,
- mediation effect model

FullText(HTML)

References (31)

References

[1]	赵若玺,赵建军. 绿色发展:实践指向与价值追寻[J]. 人民论坛·学术前沿,2019(12):102-105.
[2]	廖显春,李小慧,施训鹏. 绿色投资对绿色福利的影响机制研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2020,30(2):148-157.
[3]	田有丽. 绿色福利概念的历史考察、形态分析及实践应用研究[D]. 合肥: 合肥工业大学, 2019.
[4]	接贵霞. 农业绿色发展思想及实践指导−评《乡村绿色发展之路:坚持人与自然和谐共生》[J]. 中国农业资源与区划,2020,41(8):40-57.
[5]	孙永胜,佟连军. 吉林省限制开发区域绿色发展水平的时空演变特征与影响因素[J]. 中国农业资源与区划,2020,41(8):154-161.
[6]	尹建平,王建琼,邹约儒. 投资林业实现资产保值增值[J]. 林业经济,2017,39(1):71-77.
[7]	SEN A. Inequality reexamined[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992.
[8]	钟水映,冯英杰. 中国省际间绿色发展福利测量与评价[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2017,27(9):196-204.
[9]	RAVALLION M. Mashup indices of development[J]. World Bank Research Observer,2012,27(1):1-32. doi: 10.1093/wbro/lkr009
[10]	徐晓亮,程倩,车莹,等. 资源政策调整对减排和环境福利影响−以煤炭资源税改革为例[J]. 管理科学学报,2017,20(2):18-31. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9807.2017.02.003
[11]	李成宇,张士强,张伟,等. 中国省际生态福利绩效测算及影响因素研究[J]. 地理科学,2019,39(12):1875-1883.
[12]	方时姣,肖权. 中国区域生态福利绩效水平及其空间效应研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2019,29(3):1-10.
[13]	诸大建,张帅. 生态福利绩效及其与经济增长的关系研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(9):59-67. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2014.09.009
[14]	龙亮军,王霞. 我国城市化进程中生态损耗、经济增长与福利水平的关系研究−基于Tapio脱钩分析和Granger因果关系检验[J]. 经济问题探索,2017(3):98-106.
[15]	邓远建,杨旭,陈光炬,等. 中国生态福利绩效水平的空间非均衡及动态演进[J]. 中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2020,20(4):115-127.
[16]	肖黎明,肖沁霖. 黄河流域城市生态福利绩效格局分异及空间收敛分析[J]. 软科学,2021,35(2):46-53.
[17]	LARSEN E G. Welfare retrenchments and government support:evidence from a natural experiment[J]. European Sociological Review,2018,34(1):40-51. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcx081
[18]	董梅,徐璋勇,李存芳. 碳强度约束对城乡居民福利水平的影响:基于CGE模型的分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(2):94-105.
[19]	刘茜,李铎,赵琪. 城市绿地与实现居民生态福利的关系及协调[J]. 广西社会科学,2019(3):76-80. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6917.2019.03.013
[20]	刘自敏,邓明艳,崔志伟,等. 能源贫困对居民福利的影响及其机制:基于CGSS数据的分析[J]. 中国软科学,2020(8):143-163. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2020.08.014
[21]	龙亮军. 基于两阶段Super-NSBM模型的城市生态福利绩效评价研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2019,29(7):1-10.
[22]	COLE M A,JRELLIOTT R J,ZHANG J. Growth,foreign direct investment,and the environment:evidence from Chinese cities[J]. Journal of Regional Science,2011,51(1):121-138. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2010.00674.x
[23]	OLAWUMI T O,CHAN D W. A scientometric review of global research on sustainability and sustainable development[J]. Journal of cleaner production,2018,183:231-250. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.162
[24]	谭卫华,舒银燕. 新金融发展与工业绿色转型−基于系统GMM模型的实证分析[J]. 经济地理,2020,40(11):149-157.
[25]	臧漫丹,诸大建,刘国平. 生态福利绩效:概念、内涵及G20实证[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2013,23(5):118-124. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2013.05.018
[26]	宋马林,金培振. 地方保护、资源错配与环境福利绩效[J]. 经济研究,2016,51(12):47-61.
[27]	韩瑾. 生态福利绩效评价及影响因素研究−以宁波市为例[J]. 经济论坛,2017(10):49-53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3580.2017.10.010
[28]	徐昱东,亓朋,童临风. 中国省级地区生态福利绩效水平时空分异格局研究[J]. 区域经济评论,2017(4):123-131.
[29]	肖黎明,张仙鹏. 强可持续理念下绿色创新效率与生态福利绩效耦合协调的时空特征[J]. 自然资源学报,2019,34(2):312-324.
[30]	李静,白江. 新型城镇化对社会福祉提升的影响分析[J]. 求是学刊,2016,43(5):62-68. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7504.2016.05.007
[31]	任洁,邹中琪,董玮,等. 财政支出、社会投资与森林生态资源积累−基于中国省际面板数据的实证分析[J]. 林业经济,2019,41(5):60-65,113.

Cited By

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (673) PDF downloads (46)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

The Impact of Forestry Investment on Urban Residents' Green Welfare

Abstract

References

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content