The Impact of the Expiration of Subsidies for the Sloping Land Conversion Program on Farmer Households' Income and Its Mechanism: Based on the Perspective of Non-farm Employment

Qiu Shanshan; Chen Chen; Shi Yanlu; Wang Liqun

doi:10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2022154

Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science) > 2023 > 22(3): 43-49. > DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2022154

Qiu Shanshan, Chen Chen, Shi Yanlu, Wang Liqun. The Impact of the Expiration of Subsidies for the Sloping Land Conversion Program on Farmer Households' Income and Its Mechanism: Based on the Perspective of Non-farm Employment[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2023, 22(3): 43-49. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2022154

Citation:

PDF (620 KB)

The Impact of the Expiration of Subsidies for the Sloping Land Conversion Program on Farmer Households' Income and Its Mechanism: Based on the Perspective of Non-farm Employment

School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, 100083, P. R. China

More Information

Received Date: July 28, 2022
Available Online: November 27, 2022
Published Date: September 24, 2023

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Exploring the impact of the expiration of the first round subsidies for the Sloping Land Conversion Program (SLCP) on farmer households' income will help to provide empirical evidence for improving the long-term mechanism for consolidating the SLCP, increasing farmer households’ income and achieving the overall goal of rural revitalization. Based on the survey data of 897 farmer households in the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Gansu and Hunan provinces, this paper uses a multi-period DID to investigate the impact of the expiration of the subsidies for the SLCP on farmer households' income, and tests its specific impact mechanism from the perspective of non-farm employment. The results show that the expiration of the subsidies for the SLCP prompts farmer households to participate in non-farm employment and increase their income, so that their total income level does not fall but rises. This effect has initially appeared in the year when the subsidies for the SLCP expire, and shows a trend from strong to weak over time. Heterogeneity analysis found that the expiration of the subsidies for the SLCP has a relatively weak effect on the income level of farmer households with small scale of SLCP, while it has a significantly negative impact on the income level of elderly farmer households. Based on test results above, this paper puts forward policy recommendations from the aspects of enhancing farmer households' ability to transfer employment, formulating differentiated assistance measures and timely issuing follow-up policies for the SLCP.
- Sloping Land Conversion Program,
- subsidy policy,
- farmer households' income,
- multi-period DID,
- non-farm employment

FullText(HTML)

References (32)

References

[1]	LI J,FELDMAN M W,LI S Z,et al. Rural household income and inequality under the Sloping Land Conversion Program in western China[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2011,108(19):7721-7726. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1101018108
[2]	段伟,申津羽,温亚利. 西部地区退耕还林工程对农户收入的影响:基于异质性的处理效应估计[J]. 农业技术经济,2018(2):41-53.
[3]	WU Z L,DAI X H,LI B,et al. Livelihood consequences of the Grain for Green Programme across regional and household scales:a case study in the Loess Plateau[J]. Land Use Policy,2021,111:105746. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105746
[4]	吴乐,孔德帅,靳乐山. 生态补偿对不同收入农户扶贫效果研究[J]. 农业技术经济,2018(5):134-144.
[5]	谢旭轩,张世秋,朱山涛. 退耕还林对农户可持续生计的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版),2010,46(3):457-464.
[6]	石颜露,陈琛,王立群. 退耕补贴到期对贫困地区农户主观贫困的影响:基于四川和河北802份调研数据的分析[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2022,23(2):27-35.
[7]	蔡志坚,蒋瞻,杜丽永,等. 退耕还林政策的有效性与有效政策搭配的存在性[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2015,25(9):60-69. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2015.09.009
[8]	张炜,薛建宏,张兴. 退耕还林政策对农户收入的影响及其作用机制[J]. 农村经济,2019(6):130-136.
[9]	王庶,岳希明. 退耕还林、非农就业与农民增收:基于21省面板数据的双重差分分析[J]. 经济研究,2017,52(4):106-119.
[10]	李树茁,梁义成,FELDMAN M W,等. 退耕还林政策对农户生计的影响研究:基于家庭结构视角的可持续生计分析[J]. 公共管理学报,2010,7(2):1-10.
[11]	谢晨,张坤,王佳男,等. 退耕还林动态减贫:收入贫困和多维贫困的共同分析[J]. 中国农村经济,2021(5):18-37.
[12]	LI L C,LIU C,LIU J L,et al. Has the Sloping Land Conversion Program in China impacted the income and employment of rural households?[J]. Land Use Policy,2021,109(4):105648.
[13]	陈琛,石颜露,邱珊珊,等. 首轮退耕补贴到期对农户非农就业的影响[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2022,36(12):15-21.
[14]	刘天婕,黄杰龙,赵娅娅,等. 首轮退耕补贴到期对农户收入影响调查与分析[J]. 林业经济问题,2022,42(2):188-195.
[15]	缪书超,钱龙,宋亮. 农业补贴与农村家庭非农创业:基于中国家庭金融调查(CHFS)数据的实证分析[J]. 农业经济问题,2021(3):62-74.
[16]	赵娅娅,黄杰龙,李瑞民,等. 退耕补贴到期对贫困地区农户消费的影响研究[J]. 中国农业资源与区划,2022,43(7):183-192.
[17]	陈琛, 杜温鑫, 王立群. 首轮退耕补贴到期对农户退耕地利用意愿影响研究: 基于农户主观福利的中介检验[J].中国农业资源与区划, 2023,44（3）: 177-185.
[18]	中国社会科学院农村发展研究所, 国家统计局农村社会经济调查司. 农村绿皮书: 中国农村经济形势分析与预测（2020 ~ 2021）[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2021.
[19]	孙久文,夏添. 中国扶贫战略与2020年后相对贫困线划定:基于理论、政策和数据的分析[J]. 中国农村经济,2019(10):98-113.
[20]	BECK T,LEVINE R,LEVKOV A. Big bad banks? the winners and losers from bank deregulation in the United States[J]. The Journal of Finance,2010,65(5):1637-1667. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01589.x
[21]	何凌云,马青山. 智慧城市试点能否提升城市创新水平?:基于多期DID的经验证据[J]. 财贸研究,2021,32(3):28-40.
[22]	杨进,陈志钢. 劳动力价格上涨和老龄化对农村土地租赁的影响[J]. 中国农村经济,2016(5):71-83.
[23]	潘丹,陆雨,孔凡斌. 不同贫困程度农户退耕还林的收入效应[J]. 林业科学,2020,56(8):148-161. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20200817
[24]	蔡洁,夏显力. 农地转出:缓解还是加剧了农户的多维贫困?[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(12):2971-2979.
[25]	王恒,王征兵,朱玉春. 乡村振兴战略下连片特困地区劳动力流动减贫效应研究:基于收入贫困与多维贫困的双重视角[J]. 农村经济,2020(4):43-50.
[26]	黄溶冰,赵谦,王丽艳. 自然资源资产离任审计与空气污染防治:“和谐锦标赛”还是“环保资格赛”[J]. 中国工业经济,2019(10):23-41. doi: 10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2019.10.002
[27]	PAUL T,PAMELA J,CONGHE S,et al. Impacts of China's Grain for Green Program on migration and household income[J]. Environmental management,2018,62(3):489-499. doi: 10.1007/s00267-018-1047-0
[28]	钱雪松,唐英伦,方胜. 担保物权制度改革降低了企业债务融资成本吗?:来自中国《物权法》自然实验的经验证据[J]. 金融研究,2019(7):115-134.
[29]	BARON R M,KENNY D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:conceptual,strategic,and statistical considerations[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1986,51(6):1173-1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
[30]	温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,等. 中介效应检验程序及其应用[J]. 心理学报,2004(5):614-620.
[31]	严中成,漆雁斌,韦锋,等. 非农就业对农户农地价值预期的影响研究:来自CHFS的实证分析[J]. 中国农业资源与区划,2022,43(7):193-204.
[32]	蔡洁,刘斐,夏显力. 农村产业融合、非农就业与农户增收:基于六盘山的微观实证[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2020,34(2):73-79.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(2)

1.	CUI Yunxia，LIU Xiaopeng，JIANG Chunmei，TIAN Rujun，NIU Qingrui. Influencing Factors and Prediction of Risk of Returning to Ecological Poverty in Liupan Mountain Region, China. Chinese Geographical Science. 2024(03): 420-435 .
2.	刘义花. 退耕还林工作中存在的问题及对策. 河北农机. 2024(09): 166-168 .

Other cited types(4)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (458) PDF downloads (37) Cited by(6)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

The Impact of the Expiration of Subsidies for the Sloping Land Conversion Program on Farmer Households' Income and Its Mechanism: Based on the Perspective of Non-farm Employment

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(2)

Other cited types(4)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content