Advanced search
CHE Chen, WU Shu-hong, ZHU Jiang-hua, ZENG Yi-yu. On Approaches of Identifying and Incentivizing Non-carbon Benefits in REDD+[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2015, 14(3): 47-52.
Citation: CHE Chen, WU Shu-hong, ZHU Jiang-hua, ZENG Yi-yu. On Approaches of Identifying and Incentivizing Non-carbon Benefits in REDD+[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2015, 14(3): 47-52.

On Approaches of Identifying and Incentivizing Non-carbon Benefits in REDD+

More Information
  • Published Date: September 29, 2015
  • The non-carbon benefits in REDD+ play a vital role in ensuring sustainable effects of REDD+ activities. The issue related to non-carbon benefits in REDD+ has become the main topic of REDD+ negotiation under UNFCCC. In this article the relationships between the types of non-carbon benefits and the national strategies of REDD+ are analyzed, focusing on the major topics discussed by related parties in the negotiations for non-carbon benefits in REDD+ , which include the decisions on non-carbon benefits of REDD+ activities in UNFCCC, the definitions of non-carbon benefits, as well as the relations between non-carbon benefits and factors of the types of REDD+ activities, the target geographical areas of REDD+ activities, and the allocation of REDD+ investment. On this basis, this paper puts forward the approaches to identify the types of non-carbon benefits at national level, including determining the drives for land use change based on the status of national development, identifying prior development regions from national demands, and selecting types of REDD+ activities according to the characteristics of prioritized regions; and the approaches to incentivize non-carbon benefits in accordance with the phases of activities and China's national condition. With reference to China's situations, we also present several suggestions for China to participate in the negotiation of REDD+ non-carbon benefits, such as integrating non-carbon benefit into the REDD + national strategy, safeguarding national sovereignty, emphasizing the additionality of non-carbon benefits versus the principle of safety and security, and providing the methodological guide.
  • Related Articles

    [1]Chai Xinxin, Gao Mengjiao. Theoretical Tracing and Realistic Approach to Marxism Ecological Criticism[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2024, 23(3): 62-69. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2024063
    [2]Liu Xiaoyi. The Logical Approach of Ecological Marxist Modernity Criticism and its Practical Implications[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2024, 23(3): 55-61. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2024088
    [3]LI Si-yu, WU Hong-mei. Sustainability of the Log Trade Based on Ecological Information Approach[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2019, 18(4): 69-75. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2019069
    [4]YIN Wei-da, LI Xuan. Approaches of Exploring and Realizing Nurturing Functions of Special Timber for Ancient Buildings in Urban Green Space Planning#br#[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2015, 14(4): 33-37. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2015077
    [5]LI Ming. Narrative Practice:A Human Ecological Approach in Psychology[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2013, 12(2): 63-68.
    [6]WANG Xiao-jun, XIE Yi. Incentive Systems of Private Forest Management in the United States of American[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2012, 11(3): 94-98.
    [7]ZHANG Yong. Application Analysis of Participatory Approach in the Grain for Green Project[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2010, 9(1): 106-109.
    [8]HUANG Lei, ZHANG Cai-hong, HE Zhong-wei, . Study on the Incentive Policy and its Effects in the Development of Woody Coal Industry[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2009, 8(4): 156-159.
    [9]FENG Jing, XIA Zi-qian. A Review of the Poverty in Forest Regions in China and the Solution Approaches[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2007, 6(3): 63-67.
    [10]JI Jun-cai. The Basic Approaches to Realize Harmony between Human and Nature[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2006, 5(3): 40-44.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. 陈灿,杨帆. 森林碳汇如何促进项目实施地区农民增收?. 中国西部. 2021(01): 58-68 .
    2. 张峰,周彩贤,于海群. 北京市建立基于森林碳汇管理的生态补偿机制的思路探讨. 林业经济. 2017(03): 53-57 .
    3. 芮晓东,杨红强,聂影. 林业碳汇项目的利益共享机制:基于利益来源与分配的研究综述. 林业经济. 2017(12): 72-79 .
    4. 计露萍,周国模,顾蕾,王磊. “REDD+”的研究现状与展望. 世界农业. 2017(06): 161-167 .

    Other cited types(2)

Catalog

    Article views (767) PDF downloads (190) Cited by(6)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return