| Citation: |
Gao Xiang, Cheng Hui. Institutional Ecological Folk Custom of Ethnic Minorities in Xiangxi, Hunan Province from the Perspective of Ecological Civilization[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2024, 23(2): 35-41. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2022170
|
Institutional ecological folk custom refers to ecological folklore primarily characterized by institutional rules, falling within the realm of informal institutions. It exhibits distinctive features such as being normative, supplementary and adjusting and other typical characteristics when compared to conventional ecological folk customs. According to the targeted adjustment objects and regulatory purposes, institutional ecological folk customs in Xiangxi of Hunan Province can be divided into three major types. Firstly, natural taboo type of ecological folk custom primarily adjusting the relationship between "man and God", exemplified by the Miao nationality's taboo on cutting maple trees; secondly, the villager's conventional type of ecological folk custom mainly adjusting the relationship between "man and man", exemplified by the Miao Nationality's Langgui Treaty prohibiting cross-border tree logging; thirdly, the technical rule type of ecological folk custom primarily adjusting the relationship between "man and nature" , exemplified by the Dong nationality's folk custom of "intercropping of forest and grain". In the new era of ecological civilization, there is a need to enhance cultural awareness of institutional ecological folk custom and promote the creative transformation and innovative development of traditional ecological culture among ethnic minorities in Xiangxi, Hunan Province.
| [1] |
湘西州2010年第六次全国人口普查主要数据公报[EB/OL]. (2019-03-24)[2020-01-16]. https://www.xxz.gov.cn/zwgk/fdxxgknr/qtfdxx/tzgg/201110/t20111026_958588.html.
|
| [2] |
V. 奥斯特罗姆, D. 菲尼, H. 皮希特. 制度分析与发展的反思: 问题与抉择[M]. 王诚,等译. 北京:商务印书馆,1992:134.
|
| [3] |
罗士松. 土家族渔猎[M]. 北京:中央民族大学出版社,2009:60-62.
|
| [4] |
张文显. 法理学[M]. 第二版. 北京:高等教育出版社,北京大学出版社,2003:95.
|
| [5] |
蔡守秋. 环境资源法教程[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社,2003:65.
|
| [6] |
万建中. 中国民间禁忌风俗[M]. 北京:中央编译出版社,2010:3.
|
| [7] |
任骋. 中国民间禁忌[M]. 第五版. 济南:山东人民出版社,2012:5-8
|
| [8] |
刘晓明. 论民族习惯法之社会功用[J]. 贵州民族研究,2004(2):96-100.
|
| [9] |
罗义群. 苗族自然观与生态文明建设[J]. 民族论坛,2008(10):32-33.
|
| [10] |
邢启顺. 贵州苗族生态文化简析[J]. 黔南民族师范学院学报,2007(2):24-28.
|
| [11] |
焦丽锋. 湘西地区苗族信仰类型初探[M]. 成都:四川民族出版社,2018:145.
|
| [12] |
商万里. 地方性知识:侗款与民族地区生态环境保护[J]. 黑龙江民族丛刊,2020(2):109-113.
|
| [13] |
王启梁. 习惯法/民间法研究范式的批判性理解:兼论社会控制概念在法学研究中的运用可能[J]. 现代法学,2006(5):19-27.
|
| [14] |
刘雁翎. 论贵州苗族环境习惯法[J]. 贵州民族研究,2008(4):7-11.
|
| [15] |
张苗. 技术规律与技术规则[J]. 淮阴师范学院学报,2005(4):440-443.
|
| [16] |
潘天群. 论技术规则[J]. 科学技术与辩证法,1995(4):52-55.
|
| [17] |
杨朝霞. 论环境标准的法律地位:对主流观点的反思与补充[J]. 行政与法,2008(1):107-112.
|
| [18] |
乌丙安. 论生态民俗链:中国生态民俗学的构想[J]. 江苏社会科学,2001(5):103-107.
|
| [19] |
龙山县志[M]. 龙山:湖南省龙山县修志办公室,1985:590,588.
|
| [20] |
刘建玲. 论改土归流前后湘西土家族饮食习俗的变化[J]. 重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版),2011(20):128-129,135.
|
| [21] |
张忠奎. 改土归流与苗疆再造:清代“新疆六厅”的王化进程及其社会文化变迁[M]. 北京:中国社会科学出版社,2012:58-59.
|
| [22] |
罗康隆,艾菊红. 生态民族学之路仍在远方:罗康隆教授采访记[J]. 原生态民族文化学刊,2019(2):2-10.
|
| [23] |
祁庆富. 关于二十一世纪生态民族学的思考[J]. 中央民族大学学报,1999(6):9-14.
|
| [24] |
姚亮. 信仰背后的权、利纠葛:湘西苗族信仰状况观察[J]. 黔南民族师范学院学报,2019(1):10-15.
|
| [25] |
费孝通. 关于“文化自觉”的一些自白[J]. 学术研究,2003(7):5-9.
|
| [26] |
赵建军. 中华优秀传统生态文化的创造性转化创新性发展[N]. 人民日报,2022-07-18(11).
|
| [27] |
梁治平. 民间法、习惯和习惯法[EB/OL]. (2020-03-12)[2023-01-30]. https://www.360doc.com/content/20/0310/08/17594866_898098865.shtml.
|
| [28] |
孙九霞,刘相军. 地方性知识视角下的传统文化传承与自然环境保护研究:以雨崩藏族旅游村寨为例[J]. 中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2014(6):71-77.
|
| [29] |
杨朝霞. 生态文明观的法律表达:第三代环境法的生成[M]. 北京:中国政法大学出版社,2009:58-63.
|
Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd. 
DownLoad: