| Citation: |
Liu Lin, Wu Yunfei. A Critical Examination of the Theory of Natural Resource Value——Based on the Perspective of Marxist Political Economy[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science). DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2024242
|
Proponents of “the theory of natural resource value” argue that natural resources inherently contain an intrinsic substance of value that does not derive from external sources. They simplistically attribute contemporary socio-ecological problems to an "unwavering belief" in Marx's labor theory of value. They claim that ecological issues can be resolved merely by assigning value to natural resources and incorporating them into the capitalist economic system. Unfortunately, “the theory of natural resource value” itself is fraught with limitations, and its critiques of Marx's labor theory of value are entirely untenable. In reality, natural resources cannot independently constitute the substance of value; they only acquire value when they embody objectified human labor. Therefore, asserting that natural resources possess value requires certain qualifying conditions. However, to claim that natural resources are the source of value based on “the theory of natural resource value” is a complete theoretical fallacy. Under the capitalist mode of production, the sole source of value can only be undifferentiated abstract human labor. Any attempt to discuss the value of natural resources outside the framework of the labor theory of value is nothing more than a futile and unproductive fantasy.
| [1] |
习近平. 高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜 为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告(2022年10月16日)[N]. 人民日报,2022-10-26(1).
|
| [2] |
罗丽艳. 自然资源价值的理论思考:论劳动价值论中自然资源价值的缺失[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2003(6):22-25.
|
| [3] |
晏智杰. 自然资源价值刍议[J]. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2004(6):70-77.
|
| [4] |
杨艳琳. 自然资源价值论:劳动价值论角度的解释及其意义[J]. 经济评论,2002(1):52-55.
|
| [5] |
周肇光. 马克思价值论与自然资源价值决定的内在联系[J]. 安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007(5):145-148. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5019.2007.05.029
|
| [6] |
温莲香. 自然资源价值:马克思劳动价值论的诠释[J]. 济南大学学报(社会科学版),2009,19(6):36-39. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3842.2009.06.008
|
| [7] |
陈云. “绿水青山就是金山银山”的学理阐释:自然资源价值论的辨正与马克思劳动价值论的交汇[J]. 南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版),2023,54(3):38-46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0448.2023.03.006
|
| [8] |
刘治兰. 关于自然资源价值理论的再认识[J]. 北京行政学院学报,2002(5):47-50. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7621.2002.05.010
|
| [9] |
白玮,郝晋珉. 自然资源价值探讨[J]. 生态经济,2005(10):5-7,12.
|
| [10] |
张婧. 关于自然资源价值的探讨[J]. 经济论坛,2011(9):222-224. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3580.2011.09.065
|
| [11] |
余谋昌. 自然价值与新经济学[J]. 道德与文明,2011(4):5-8.
|
| [12] |
HAWKEN P,LOVINS A ,LOVINS H. Natural capitalism:creating the next industrial revolution[M]. Boston:Little,Brown and Company,1999:9.
|
| [13] |
GARRETT H. The tragedy of the commons[J]. Science,1968,162(3859):1243-1248. doi: 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
|
| [14] |
马克思恩格斯选集:第1卷[M]. 中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,编译. 北京:人民出版社,2012:406.
|
| [15] |
马克思恩格斯全集:第44卷[M]. 中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,编译. 北京:人民出版社,2001:49-51,52,90,48,8,93,122-123.
|
| [16] |
王峰明. 《资本论》的逻辑、方法与意义:以马克思的劳动价值论为例[J]. 哲学动态,2017(8):12-24.
|
| [17] |
马克思恩格斯全集:第30卷[M]. 中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,编译. 北京:人民出版社,1995:89,56.
|
| [18] |
马克思恩格斯文集:第1卷[M]. 中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,编译. 北京:人民出版社,2009:602,603.
|
| [19] |
马克思恩格斯全集:第46卷[M]. 中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,编译. 北京:人民出版社,2003:925,728,729.
|
| [20] |
丁堡骏. 转形问题研究[J]. 中国社会科学,1999(5):21-34 , 204-205.
|
| [21] |
马克思恩格斯全集:第31卷[M]. 中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,编译. 北京:人民出版社,1998:413.
|
| [22] |
刘顺. “杰文斯悖论”:资本逻辑宰制下技术的生态幻象[J]. 自然辩证法研究,2017,33(9):33-38.
|
| [23] |
马克思恩格斯全集:第34卷[M]. 中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,编译. 北京:人民出版社,2008:186.
|
| [24] |
ROTERING F. Ecology,value,and Marx [EB/OL]. [2025-04-24]. https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Ecology%2C+value%2C+and+Marx.-a0176821702.
|
| 1. |
李双，张驰，檀苏红，耿晶晶，王文江. 氮磷钾配比施肥对君迁子幼树生长及生理生化特性的影响. 中国南方果树. 2024(05): 146-152 .
|
Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd. 
DownLoad: